CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Nuclear Energy Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plants 1 & 2 in Eurajoki, Finland.

Published on August 10th, 2011 | by Bob Higgins

3

A Legacy: The Eternal Nuclear Dump

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

August 10th, 2011 by  


I got an email this morning inviting me to host a screening for a documentary film titled “Into Eternity.” It’s the story of Onkalo which means hiding place or cave, a nuclear waste repository being constructed in Finland.  The film delves into the ethical questions of storing nuclear waste for centuries and the building of a facility that is supposed to last 100,000 years when no structure that we know of has lasted a tenth that long.

Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plants 1 & 2 in Eurajoki, Finland.

Olkiluoto Nuclear Plant

I’ve been against the continued development of nuclear power and weapons since grade school when they used to send us to the basement to prepare for a Russian nuclear attack by crouching in the boiler room, covering our heads with our arms and kissing our little butts goodbye.

Many of us from that generation lived with nightmares of mushroom clouds and the human silhouettes burned into Hiroshima’s sidewalks until we were in our teens.

The facility is the Onkalo nuclear waste repository and it’s currently being dug to a depth of some 1700 meters on the island of Olkiluoto, Finland. The idea here, like the ill-fated project at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, is to create a long-term solution for the disposal of high-level nuclear waste.

The reactors at Olkiluoto are two Boiling Water Reactors, (think old, think Westinghouse and, yes, think Fukushima).  Another unit is under construction (a European Pressurized Water Reactor) and suffering the problems of workmanship and design that arise when various parties begin disputing issues of responsibility and profit. It is suffering lengthy delays and cost overruns.  A fourth reactor is planned and has been licensed.

I’ve always been bothered by the term repository. I prefer the word dump. I think it’s a more honest and direct description of what’s being done. I find it difficult to think of something as evil as plutonium and other long-term products of our nuclear follies laying in quiet repose deep in the earth for the 100,000 years they intend. I fear that when this stuff is finally unearthed it will still have a malignant smile on its face. Repose, indeed,.. I think waiting for opportunity is more likely.

They estimate that the facility will hold about a hundred years worth of this toxic trash and then they will simply cover it up, seal the whole mess in the ground and walk away like a cat from his litter box daintily shaking his paws. Problem buried, case closed.

For tens of thousands of years, we’ve been discarding our trash, old broken pottery, bent swords, dented helmets, ancient Roman spare-rib bones, every bit of the detritus of our societies, in dumps. We generally place them on the outskirts of town (NIMBY has been around for awhile) and build anew on top of them. I suspect that if we ever scrape away all the landfills we may find that the earth was originally no more impressive than the now demoted Pluto.

We remember our ancestors largely from what they have discarded in their trash dumps, some of which they may wish had been better hidden and we may share that wish.

A central theme of the Into Eternity film is: what will our descendants find and when will they find it? We believe that the most dangerous and long-lived elements in the waste will be safe after 100,000 years or so. How can we keep some future Indiana Jones from digging it up and causing death and destruction in a future civilization? Have we the right to leave this dark bonus of a time capsule?

How can we warn them, what language might they understand, what symbols might we use to convey the message?

But its nice to think that we’re more considerate of some future race of Elois or Morlocks and we take more care to protect them from harm than our present neighbors whom we are happy to simply slaughter wholesale.

Admittedly, I haven’t seen the film, I’m just passing on what the producers told me by email, and what I saw on the impressive trailer but if you want to host a screening or help to promote this worthy film, please go here.

It’s for a good cause.

Photo by kallerna (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Lifelong liberal of the Tom Paine wing. Marine Vietnam vet. Have worked as a photographer, cab driver, bartender, carpenter, cabinetmaker, writer and editor. Now retired on a Veterans Disability program I spend my time writing, and complaining about politics and the environment.



  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DIZK5EF4TDBLC6KXBNVEGAM7WY j

    I read your story and feel for your cause, however; coporate greed, the lust for profits and government support does not! And will not.
    The glowing “buzz words” relative to the goodness of nuclear power elect generation, the enviromental -cleaniness of the nuc and the contribution to the public good will always prevail.Whenever there is dessent the horrors of coal and the emense numbers of body bages is called up from the depth to remind all of us as to how wonderful the nuc is. We all should be extreemyl grateful.
    Considering the average life span of humans is about 90 years and that period is all there is to accumulate and enjoy wealth- who has time in the corporate and political world to care about the future? Certinaly no one can believe that coporations do. Their bottom line and only objective is profit. nothing else.
    Anything spanning thousands of years is well beyond their attention span, after all the severe consequences of what they created and imposed on generations will most likely never be their problem to resolve- so why worry? be happy!

  • BlueRock

    > We believe that the most dangerous and long-lived elements in the waste will be safe after 100,000 years or so.

    It’s actually much longer than that:

    * “Of particular concern in nuclear waste management are two long-lived fission products, Tc-99 (half-life 220,000 years) and I-129 (half-life 17 million years)…” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Management_of_waste

    If our distant descendants find this stuff and they don’t understand what it is, they will be poisoned by it.

    Nuclear waste: the gift that never stops giving.

  • BlueRock

    I can’t recommend this documentary highly enough. It’s a must watch if you want to understand the implications of storing radioactive for thousands of generations.

    Anyone who is still pro-nuke after watching it should probably not be allowed to play with scissors and sharp knives.

Back to Top ↑