<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Solar PV to Double in 2011; Grow 47% a year to 2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entersolar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/#comment-103488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Entersolar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29491#comment-103488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is great to see solar installations flourishing in this downward spiral economy. Diligent companies are looking towards the future - both financially, and for the planet. We hope it becomes like a snowball down a hill. Our new blog post is on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entersolar.com/nj-srecs-supply-and-demand/#more-611&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NJ SREC prices&lt;/a&gt;, and we think you might find it to be informative. We look forward to following your insight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to see solar installations flourishing in this downward spiral economy. Diligent companies are looking towards the future &#8211; both financially, and for the planet. We hope it becomes like a snowball down a hill. Our new blog post is on <a href="http://www.entersolar.com/nj-srecs-supply-and-demand/#more-611" rel="nofollow">NJ SREC prices</a>, and we think you might find it to be informative. We look forward to following your insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astarloa60</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/#comment-102847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astarloa60]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29491#comment-102847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 6.4 GW refers to total installed capacity...One hard number for overall US solar PV capacity is actually difficult to find and pin down...Solarbuzz&#039;s 6.4 GW total out of the 17 GW is dependent on events yet to unfold...

According to Solarbuzz, &quot;Within the next five years, Solarbuzz forecasts the market will grow to up to 6.4 GW depending on the scenario, representing a CAGR of up to 47%, underpinned by a current project pipeline of over 17 GW.&quot;

According to SEIA&#039;s Q1 2011 review, cumulative grid-connected PV in the U.S. totaled over 2.3 GW.  Total for off-grid isn&#039;t included in the report.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6.4 GW refers to total installed capacity&#8230;One hard number for overall US solar PV capacity is actually difficult to find and pin down&#8230;Solarbuzz&#8217;s 6.4 GW total out of the 17 GW is dependent on events yet to unfold&#8230;</p>
<p>According to Solarbuzz, &#8220;Within the next five years, Solarbuzz forecasts the market will grow to up to 6.4 GW depending on the scenario, representing a CAGR of up to 47%, underpinned by a current project pipeline of over 17 GW.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to SEIA&#8217;s Q1 2011 review, cumulative grid-connected PV in the U.S. totaled over 2.3 GW.  Total for off-grid isn&#8217;t included in the report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/#comment-102819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29491#comment-102819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009 (2010 numbers not yet released) we had 0.619 GW of solar on line in the US and that produced only 0.02% of our total electricity.

Just a rough back-of-envelop suggests that we need 50x of the 2009 capacity or about 31GW to reach a 1% power production share.  When solar becomes 1% of our total grid supply I think it will be taken a lot more seriously.  Right now I see people dismissing solar based on the small roll it is playing.

That used to be the case for wind power, but with wind now above 2% (2.3% in 2010) wind is getting respect.  And shaping the grid mix.



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2009 (2010 numbers not yet released) we had 0.619 GW of solar on line in the US and that produced only 0.02% of our total electricity.</p>
<p>Just a rough back-of-envelop suggests that we need 50x of the 2009 capacity or about 31GW to reach a 1% power production share.  When solar becomes 1% of our total grid supply I think it will be taken a lot more seriously.  Right now I see people dismissing solar based on the small roll it is playing.</p>
<p>That used to be the case for wind power, but with wind now above 2% (2.3% in 2010) wind is getting respect.  And shaping the grid mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Norminton</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/08/us-solar-pv-to-double-in-2011-grow-47-a-year-to-2015/#comment-102814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Norminton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29491#comment-102814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I&#039;m rather dim, but it seems to me that this post is very unclear. In the first paragraph, does the claim that &quot;the US solar PV market [will] grow... to reach 6.4 GW by 2015&quot; refer to TOTAL installed power, or installations for that one year? If it&#039;s the former, it makes a nonsense of the &#039;17 GW in the pipeline&#039; claim.

Please do better on these facts and figures. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m rather dim, but it seems to me that this post is very unclear. In the first paragraph, does the claim that &#8220;the US solar PV market [will] grow&#8230; to reach 6.4 GW by 2015&#8243; refer to TOTAL installed power, or installations for that one year? If it&#8217;s the former, it makes a nonsense of the &#8217;17 GW in the pipeline&#8217; claim.</p>
<p>Please do better on these facts and figures. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
