<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore Wind Power: ABB Wins $1 Billion North Sea Contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: denny waller</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/#comment-102647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[denny waller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29382#comment-102647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doug, 

American money is not accepted here. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, </p>
<p>American money is not accepted here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astarloa60</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/#comment-102614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astarloa60]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29382#comment-102614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Language referred to in previous comments has been changed, with due respect and consideration for &quot;English&quot; English speakers of English, as well as European speakers of the language, who read this site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Language referred to in previous comments has been changed, with due respect and consideration for &#8220;English&#8221; English speakers of English, as well as European speakers of the language, who read this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bastable</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/#comment-102571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Bastable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29382#comment-102571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[doug is right - in English english it sounds like this contract is a dead duck - I
knew USA english talks about &quot;closing deals&quot; or i&#039;d I&#039;ve been crying into my afternoon tea! We say &quot;signed&quot;  or &quot;agreed&quot; a contract - but what a good news story - roll on the pan europeon / n.african interconnecter!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doug is right &#8211; in English english it sounds like this contract is a dead duck &#8211; I<br />
knew USA english talks about &#8220;closing deals&#8221; or i&#8217;d I&#8217;ve been crying into my afternoon tea! We say &#8220;signed&#8221;  or &#8220;agreed&#8221; a contract &#8211; but what a good news story &#8211; roll on the pan europeon / n.african interconnecter!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/03/offshore-wind-power-abb-takes-down-1-billion-north-sea-contract/#comment-102543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29382#comment-102543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this a good thing but the article uses unclear language.  &quot;Taking down a contract&quot; sounds like it is being removed as in &quot;not being built&quot;.  &quot;Closing the transmission order&quot; is any clearer.

Just my 2 cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this a good thing but the article uses unclear language.  &#8220;Taking down a contract&#8221; sounds like it is being removed as in &#8220;not being built&#8221;.  &#8220;Closing the transmission order&#8221; is any clearer.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
