<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wind Turbine Noise Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discovering Solar: It&#8217;s a Radiometer, I Wanted a Magic 8-Ball &#171; Bob Higgins</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-103121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Discovering Solar: It&#8217;s a Radiometer, I Wanted a Magic 8-Ball &#171; Bob Higgins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-103121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Wind Turbine Noise Debate &#124; CleanTechnica [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Wind Turbine Noise Debate | CleanTechnica [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euroflycars</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Euroflycars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with infrasound is related to some atavic instincts: thousands of years ago, regular short-interval infrasound sequences told human tribes the imminent approach of huge animals. This could be exciting for the hunters, but was probably mostly perceived as a frightening perspective. Today, we still feel deep unrest and fear when this kind of sounds -- as produced for instance the distant bass beat of rock music -- reaches our ears.

So much the more than In the past years the rock beat frequency has been steadily risen from 2 per second (normal hart beat double pattern) to 3 per seconds (corresponding to a puls frequency of 90, as it happens when we are angry of anxious). Beverage manufacturers like Red Bull have tuned-in to this adrenaline generating trend in order to allow youngsters to sustain the faster heart beat resulting from long-lasting exposure in disco-dancing places. Adrenaline being toxic in the longer run, death casualties among young people through arythmic heart troubles have recently been reported.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with infrasound is related to some atavic instincts: thousands of years ago, regular short-interval infrasound sequences told human tribes the imminent approach of huge animals. This could be exciting for the hunters, but was probably mostly perceived as a frightening perspective. Today, we still feel deep unrest and fear when this kind of sounds &#8212; as produced for instance the distant bass beat of rock music &#8212; reaches our ears.</p>
<p>So much the more than In the past years the rock beat frequency has been steadily risen from 2 per second (normal hart beat double pattern) to 3 per seconds (corresponding to a puls frequency of 90, as it happens when we are angry of anxious). Beverage manufacturers like Red Bull have tuned-in to this adrenaline generating trend in order to allow youngsters to sustain the faster heart beat resulting from long-lasting exposure in disco-dancing places. Adrenaline being toxic in the longer run, death casualties among young people through arythmic heart troubles have recently been reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taisto Leinonen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taisto Leinonen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear green people, editors inclusive!

Please ban the term &quot;wind turbine&quot; for the time being.

While there are some experimental &quot;real&quot; wind turbine designs, it should be borne in mind that a &quot;turbine&quot; always has a casing. All the current discussion deals with WINDMILLS alone.

Taisto Leinonen, M.Sc.,
ex Editor-in-Chief of Finnish Electronics News
Helsinki, Finland
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear green people, editors inclusive!</p>
<p>Please ban the term &#8220;wind turbine&#8221; for the time being.</p>
<p>While there are some experimental &#8220;real&#8221; wind turbine designs, it should be borne in mind that a &#8220;turbine&#8221; always has a casing. All the current discussion deals with WINDMILLS alone.</p>
<p>Taisto Leinonen, M.Sc.,<br />
ex Editor-in-Chief of Finnish Electronics News<br />
Helsinki, Finland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do VAWTs actually use less land or do they just pack closer together?

Horizontal axis windmills need to be placed some distance apart in order to avoid wake disturbance problems, but they have a very small footprint.  Less than 2% of wind farms is used for &#039;footprints&#039;.

I suspect people are misusing the term &#039;footprint&#039; in the case of vertical axis mills.  It may well be that since they generally sit closer to the ground rather than high into the better wind they might require more square feet of land for footings than taller horizontal mills.



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do VAWTs actually use less land or do they just pack closer together?</p>
<p>Horizontal axis windmills need to be placed some distance apart in order to avoid wake disturbance problems, but they have a very small footprint.  Less than 2% of wind farms is used for &#8216;footprints&#8217;.</p>
<p>I suspect people are misusing the term &#8216;footprint&#8217; in the case of vertical axis mills.  It may well be that since they generally sit closer to the ground rather than high into the better wind they might require more square feet of land for footings than taller horizontal mills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas prince</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[douglas prince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s also about design, design, design. Other studies conclusively show that VAWTs produce a heck of a lot less noise than standard blade design. Plus, they require a lot less land to generate the same amount of electricity, thus reducing the footprint space needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also about design, design, design. Other studies conclusively show that VAWTs produce a heck of a lot less noise than standard blade design. Plus, they require a lot less land to generate the same amount of electricity, thus reducing the footprint space needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol, yeah, seems like it :D

Thanks for popping in! :D

nice to see that greenman face over here :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, yeah, seems like it <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>Thanks for popping in! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>nice to see that greenman face over here <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenman3610</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/07/27/the-wind-turbine-noise-debate/#comment-102293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greenman3610]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29236#comment-102293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the tea party crowd has moved on from Kenyan birth certificates to noises from windmills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the tea party crowd has moved on from Kenyan birth certificates to noises from windmills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
