Comments on: 45 Mile Wi-Fi Range is Now Possible with Lower Power Consumption

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:04:00 +0000

sometimes, when reading, we unconsciously skip words (or add them in if we know they should be there): http://www.lolpix.com/pictures/9/Funny_Pictures_1076.htm

David Fiedler — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:37:00 +0000

This article has been up for three days and nobody noticed the missing verb in the first sentence?

kodandaram Balaji — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:20:00 +0000

looking for more clarification, product details & spec, speed. can we also send tv content along with data

Wavemissions — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:14:00 +0000

Whats the cost????

Jonquid — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:15:00 +0000

If there is a satellite everyone or anyone can hear?

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:50:00 +0000

Just did a speed test – 7.61Mbps down, 1.41Mbps up.

Using a local company called 101 Netlink.

I’m past their normal range and am using an external antenna.

mds — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:00 +0000

Bob,
What is your data rate? Are you using On-Ramp?
mds

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:54:00 +0000

I’m posting this via a wifi connection. The other end of my wireless internet connection is 33.7 miles away.

(My previous wireless internet connection was a few hundred miles up in space, but that’s a different technology.)