<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Analysts Say Natural Gas Fracking Ain&#8217;t So Great &#8211; Wait, What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/27/financial-analysts-say-natural-gas-fracking-aint-so-great-wait-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/27/financial-analysts-say-natural-gas-fracking-aint-so-great-wait-what/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oboebbr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/27/financial-analysts-say-natural-gas-fracking-aint-so-great-wait-what/#comment-107424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oboebbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=28594#comment-107424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, evidently its profitable in a Ponzi-scheme kind of way...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, evidently its profitable in a Ponzi-scheme kind of way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Irving</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/27/financial-analysts-say-natural-gas-fracking-aint-so-great-wait-what/#comment-101456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Irving]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=28594#comment-101456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Reggie Jess
It&#039;s probably only profitable if you can avoid paying ALL the costs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Reggie Jess<br />
It&#8217;s probably only profitable if you can avoid paying ALL the costs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie Jess</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/27/financial-analysts-say-natural-gas-fracking-aint-so-great-wait-what/#comment-101431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reggie Jess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=28594#comment-101431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you ever spent time on wall street you would cast a very wary eye upon this kind of reporting...wall street says what is best for wall street at the moment, and you have to be aware of that.  Exxon would not invest 40-50 billion in an unprofitable venture.  Who do you think knows the situation better?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ever spent time on wall street you would cast a very wary eye upon this kind of reporting&#8230;wall street says what is best for wall street at the moment, and you have to be aware of that.  Exxon would not invest 40-50 billion in an unprofitable venture.  Who do you think knows the situation better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
