<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE &amp; Others Secure Largest US Thermal Power Project Financing in 2011 for Goliath of Thermal Power Plants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy in Canada</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-104372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grumpy in Canada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-104372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article unfortunately appears to refer to thermal solar.  At quick glance at it and that&#039;s what came to my mind. Only by reading comments at bottom did I learn that it was about a gas-fired plant.

Gas-fired plants are not &#039;clean&#039;, just cleaner than coal or oil; thus they are not green, only greenish.

At the very least, the article&#039;s title should be changed to read &quot;...Largest US GAS Thermal Power Project....&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article unfortunately appears to refer to thermal solar.  At quick glance at it and that&#8217;s what came to my mind. Only by reading comments at bottom did I learn that it was about a gas-fired plant.</p>
<p>Gas-fired plants are not &#8216;clean&#8217;, just cleaner than coal or oil; thus they are not green, only greenish.</p>
<p>At the very least, the article&#8217;s title should be changed to read &#8220;&#8230;Largest US GAS Thermal Power Project&#8230;.&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-104264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-104264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, i think we made that clear above, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i think we made that clear above, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nospam</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-104263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nospam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-104263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After searching on the net I discovered this is a GAS-FIRED power plant.  &quot;Thermal&quot; does not mean &quot;Geothermal&quot; or &quot;Solar Thermal&quot; - technically, even COAL is a &quot;thermal&quot; power plant.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After searching on the net I discovered this is a GAS-FIRED power plant.  &#8220;Thermal&#8221; does not mean &#8220;Geothermal&#8221; or &#8220;Solar Thermal&#8221; &#8211; technically, even COAL is a &#8220;thermal&#8221; power plant.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol :D  hilarious. a great comment to wake up and see again :D

i am very sorry about your severe case of lazy-ass syndrome and your need
for so much medicine -- it is wrong to pick on such people &amp; i think i
should be ashamed of myself.

maybe i should spend more time over on icanhascheesburger, so that i better
learn how to be sensitive to the style of diverse peoples... &amp; can start my
day with such humor every day :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" />  hilarious. a great comment to wake up and see again <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>i am very sorry about your severe case of lazy-ass syndrome and your need<br />
for so much medicine &#8212; it is wrong to pick on such people &amp; i think i<br />
should be ashamed of myself.</p>
<p>maybe i should spend more time over on icanhascheesburger, so that i better<br />
learn how to be sensitive to the style of diverse peoples&#8230; &amp; can start my<br />
day with such humor every day <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha ha ha. Dint u no dat bolted doors are USELESS against angry kittens? Teh magic sad eyes WORK THREW WINDOWS! Teh unix version is in beta right now.

                  Pete]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha. Dint u no dat bolted doors are USELESS against angry kittens? Teh magic sad eyes WORK THREW WINDOWS! Teh unix version is in beta right now.</p>
<p>                  Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol, Bill. this one had me laughing as well :D


:D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, Bill. this one had me laughing as well <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh my gosh, you had me laughing so hard :D


i could live with a few more comments like that :D

btw, since you ask, i think you might have difficulty spelling &#039;the&#039; and &#039;your&#039; :D &amp; &#039;mistakes&#039; lol :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my gosh, you had me laughing so hard <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>i could live with a few more comments like that <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>btw, since you ask, i think you might have difficulty spelling &#8216;the&#8217; and &#8216;your&#8217; <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /> &amp; &#8216;mistakes&#8217; lol <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete, we&#039;ve talked it out between ourselves and we are all in agreement that you have made no misteaks of any sort.  Rest assured that we will continue to find no misteaks with any of your contributions.

Also, we thought it best to let you know that we&#039;ve double bolted our doors.

Just in case you were thinking of coming over.

In fact, we&#039;ll all be moving somewhere else real soon.  We&#039;ll let you know where later....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, we&#8217;ve talked it out between ourselves and we are all in agreement that you have made no misteaks of any sort.  Rest assured that we will continue to find no misteaks with any of your contributions.</p>
<p>Also, we thought it best to let you know that we&#8217;ve double bolted our doors.</p>
<p>Just in case you were thinking of coming over.</p>
<p>In fact, we&#8217;ll all be moving somewhere else real soon.  We&#8217;ll let you know where later&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spotted a gramatical error in the FIRST letter of the FIRST sentence of yer reply to my reply. One uses a capital for teh first person singular pronoun. Ours is Washington D.C.  Also regarding teh first sentence, how DARE u point out the fact that I dunno teh difference &#039;tween a coma and an apostle! I am sending my army of angry kittens to stare at u fer hrs w their magic sad eyes!

Plz send 5$ (for kitten chow) and a s.a.s.e. or I&#039;ll TELL TEH WORLD how much u hate kittens.

It IS nice to find a site where people acknowledge their misteaks, as long as they ignore mine. If you spot one, lemme know.

                                             Pete]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spotted a gramatical error in the FIRST letter of the FIRST sentence of yer reply to my reply. One uses a capital for teh first person singular pronoun. Ours is Washington D.C.  Also regarding teh first sentence, how DARE u point out the fact that I dunno teh difference &#8216;tween a coma and an apostle! I am sending my army of angry kittens to stare at u fer hrs w their magic sad eyes!</p>
<p>Plz send 5$ (for kitten chow) and a s.a.s.e. or I&#8217;ll TELL TEH WORLD how much u hate kittens.</p>
<p>It IS nice to find a site where people acknowledge their misteaks, as long as they ignore mine. If you spot one, lemme know.</p>
<p>                                             Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, i tried to clear that up. thanks for the comment, though]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i tried to clear that up. thanks for the comment, though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i hope you won&#039;t do that (there&#039;s probably a comma in the wrong place somewhere up there), but if you do, it might actually give us a pageview boost (hard to compete with the popularity of porn sites), so i won&#039;t hold you back! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope you won&#8217;t do that (there&#8217;s probably a comma in the wrong place somewhere up there), but if you do, it might actually give us a pageview boost (hard to compete with the popularity of porn sites), so i won&#8217;t hold you back! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a 3rd, Bob already succinctly summarized key reasons cutting nuclear is important, but i&#039;ll also drop this link to an article i wrote on the matter as well (http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/25/my-thoughts-on-nuclear-energy/). we can get off coal without getting on nuclear, no matter what the nuclear industry or nuclear enthusiasts try to convince you of.


in fact, considering how much faster it is to build solar and wind projects, we would be wise to PUT OUR MONEY INTO THEM now and as much as possible rather than wasting billions on nuclear plants that will take forever to get built (if they ever actually do).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 3rd, Bob already succinctly summarized key reasons cutting nuclear is important, but i&#8217;ll also drop this link to an article i wrote on the matter as well (<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/25/my-thoughts-on-nuclear-energy/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/25/my-thoughts-on-nuclear-energy/</a>). we can get off coal without getting on nuclear, no matter what the nuclear industry or nuclear enthusiasts try to convince you of.</p>
<p>in fact, considering how much faster it is to build solar and wind projects, we would be wise to PUT OUR MONEY INTO THEM now and as much as possible rather than wasting billions on nuclear plants that will take forever to get built (if they ever actually do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert E: as Bob hints, many HUGE technological and societal transformations have come about without a global or national plan, or even a coherent plan at all. the fact that states, countries, companies, and more are trying to change course on this topic and switch to cleaner energy sources is far more important than a signed and stamped plan (that could still sit on a shelf somewhere &amp; not be used).


the plan is in action, even if it isn&#039;t written out.

Now, do I think we should make more plans and broader plans? Yes! (I was actually a &quot;planner&quot; at one point in time.) but if there&#039;s no plan, that doesn&#039;t mean there&#039;s not change! (or no need for it, of course..)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert E: as Bob hints, many HUGE technological and societal transformations have come about without a global or national plan, or even a coherent plan at all. the fact that states, countries, companies, and more are trying to change course on this topic and switch to cleaner energy sources is far more important than a signed and stamped plan (that could still sit on a shelf somewhere &amp; not be used).</p>
<p>the plan is in action, even if it isn&#8217;t written out.</p>
<p>Now, do I think we should make more plans and broader plans? Yes! (I was actually a &#8220;planner&#8221; at one point in time.) but if there&#8217;s no plan, that doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s not change! (or no need for it, of course..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hello Kathy, i tried to make it more clear that this is not a solar project, again. hope it is 100% clear now]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Kathy, i tried to make it more clear that this is not a solar project, again. hope it is 100% clear now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johyne Brooke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johyne Brooke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Pete,
a quick comment here on the power rating:  The reason they don&#039;t list the power rating in MWH is because the power plant can be run 24 hours/ day 7 days/week.  While running during that time, it can produce the 800 megawats of power (I.e.: that is the maximum power produced while running full tilt).  
When a person is talking about the amount of power a device can produce, it is typically described in units of energy for a defined period of time (which is used to describe the total amount of power produced).  Since a power plant generates the power continuously, the time variable is neglected, as being understood that it is continuous.  So, technically, calling it an 800 MW power station is correct, as it is capable of generating 800 MW of electricity on a continuous basis (I.e. 24/7).  If run continuously for a year, that would be about 7 million Megawatt hours (MWH&#039;s) of electricity produced.  

By contrast, looking at batteries or battery banks, you describe them in watthours or kilowatthours because that describes the total capacity of the device going from full charge to total charge depletion.  It is a description of the total amount of energy contained within the battery during that time period.
Hope that clarifies things a bit for you.

For the person(s) noting that the above project isn&#039;t a geothermal or solar installation, you are correct.  I believe the article could have been written better to reflect that fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Pete,<br />
a quick comment here on the power rating:  The reason they don&#8217;t list the power rating in MWH is because the power plant can be run 24 hours/ day 7 days/week.  While running during that time, it can produce the 800 megawats of power (I.e.: that is the maximum power produced while running full tilt). <br />
When a person is talking about the amount of power a device can produce, it is typically described in units of energy for a defined period of time (which is used to describe the total amount of power produced).  Since a power plant generates the power continuously, the time variable is neglected, as being understood that it is continuous.  So, technically, calling it an 800 MW power station is correct, as it is capable of generating 800 MW of electricity on a continuous basis (I.e. 24/7).  If run continuously for a year, that would be about 7 million Megawatt hours (MWH&#8217;s) of electricity produced.  </p>
<p>By contrast, looking at batteries or battery banks, you describe them in watthours or kilowatthours because that describes the total capacity of the device going from full charge to total charge depletion.  It is a description of the total amount of energy contained within the battery during that time period.<br />
Hope that clarifies things a bit for you.</p>
<p>For the person(s) noting that the above project isn&#8217;t a geothermal or solar installation, you are correct.  I believe the article could have been written better to reflect that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll say this about you, Pete.

You&#039;re entertaining.

--

This site is a bit unusual.  The authors have a tendency to readily acknowledge their mistakes and correct them.  

Other sites are known for banning people who point out that their new robes are transparent.  

I like this approach.  And few of us keep score to see who&#039;s the most correctest.  

(Correctest is an actual word!  Spell checker just told me so and I thought I was just doing some creative spelling.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say this about you, Pete.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re entertaining.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>This site is a bit unusual.  The authors have a tendency to readily acknowledge their mistakes and correct them.  </p>
<p>Other sites are known for banning people who point out that their new robes are transparent.  </p>
<p>I like this approach.  And few of us keep score to see who&#8217;s the most correctest.  </p>
<p>(Correctest is an actual word!  Spell checker just told me so and I thought I was just doing some creative spelling.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just re-read this mess. I might have mis-read 1650 GHW as 1.65GWH . Unfortunatly some &quot;accuracy Nazi&quot; has altered the original post so there is no EASY way for me to verify that I was correct. You should just assume that I was correct because I always am. 

The advocates of revisionist history have always conspired to make me appear the fool. It is just the same thing as when Donald Trump tried to warn us about the Obama birth plot. Some jerk had to dig up the truth simply to make Trump and Gary Busey look foolish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just re-read this mess. I might have mis-read 1650 GHW as 1.65GWH . Unfortunatly some &#8220;accuracy Nazi&#8221; has altered the original post so there is no EASY way for me to verify that I was correct. You should just assume that I was correct because I always am. </p>
<p>The advocates of revisionist history have always conspired to make me appear the fool. It is just the same thing as when Donald Trump tried to warn us about the Obama birth plot. Some jerk had to dig up the truth simply to make Trump and Gary Busey look foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I repeat: 1.65 GWH is equivilant to yer 800MW plant operating for just over two hours, or 4 hours at half capacity. In what alternative reality is 2 hours of capacity considered even in the same gity as the ballpark?

I just saw the reply to my flameburst (new word?!) promising a correction. I,ll withold further ranting untill I read it. God help all you should there be a single grammatical error! As Stewie Griffin once warned: Your suffering shall be legendary! I shall denounce you on all the porn sites to which I am a lifetime subscriber, and I promise you there are many.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I repeat: 1.65 GWH is equivilant to yer 800MW plant operating for just over two hours, or 4 hours at half capacity. In what alternative reality is 2 hours of capacity considered even in the same gity as the ballpark?</p>
<p>I just saw the reply to my flameburst (new word?!) promising a correction. I,ll withold further ranting untill I read it. God help all you should there be a single grammatical error! As Stewie Griffin once warned: Your suffering shall be legendary! I shall denounce you on all the porn sites to which I am a lifetime subscriber, and I promise you there are many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/01/ge-others-secure-largest-us-thermal-power-project-financing-in-2011-for-goliath-of-solar-thermal-power-plants/#comment-100310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27847#comment-100310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a natural gas peaker plant...not a solar plant...the article implies that this is solar and even asks the question, &quot;how do you feel about big solar?&quot;  Not even the same discussion.  The ONLY renewable energy benefit of this plant is that it will pick up when the local wind turbines can&#039;t supply true renewable energy.  The truth about this plant is that it is gas and it is big and it will be ugly.  All the jobs quoted are also sketchy.  This is more propaganda...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a natural gas peaker plant&#8230;not a solar plant&#8230;the article implies that this is solar and even asks the question, &#8220;how do you feel about big solar?&#8221;  Not even the same discussion.  The ONLY renewable energy benefit of this plant is that it will pick up when the local wind turbines can&#8217;t supply true renewable energy.  The truth about this plant is that it is gas and it is big and it will be ugly.  All the jobs quoted are also sketchy.  This is more propaganda&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
