<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data Center Infographic (+ Opportunities for Efficiency Improvements)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/16/data-center-infographic-opportunities-for-efficiency-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/16/data-center-infographic-opportunities-for-efficiency-improvements/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skot Colacicco</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/16/data-center-infographic-opportunities-for-efficiency-improvements/#comment-99520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skot Colacicco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27153#comment-99520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It takes alot of energy to power the cloud.

But what would we bloggers do without it?

If i couldn&#039;t upload files from my &#039;droid to my dropbox, there would be great sadness...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It takes alot of energy to power the cloud.</p>
<p>But what would we bloggers do without it?</p>
<p>If i couldn&#8217;t upload files from my &#8216;droid to my dropbox, there would be great sadness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy in an Hour {Infographic} &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/16/data-center-infographic-opportunities-for-efficiency-improvements/#comment-99491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Energy in an Hour {Infographic} &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27153#comment-99491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Energy EfficiencyData Center Infographic (+ Opportunities for Efficiency... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Energy EfficiencyData Center Infographic (+ Opportunities for Efficiency&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon K</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/16/data-center-infographic-opportunities-for-efficiency-improvements/#comment-99426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=27153#comment-99426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about more efficient software? 

We  software guys used to joke it was our job to make the software slower faster than the hardware guys make the hardware faster. 

We won.

Seriously, for decades now we&#039;ve been using more and more hardware resources to make writing and maintaining software easier, quicker and cheaper.  Of course at any given time in the evolution we worked hard to optimize whatever stack there was to get the highest whatever number.  But the stacks kept growing and growing and the hardware jocks kept blowing us away with amazing Moore-ian progress.

Maybe it&#039;s time to put a pile of effort into cutting through the amazing layers of generalizing systems to reduce back from millions the number of instructions it takes to echo a darned keystroke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about more efficient software? </p>
<p>We  software guys used to joke it was our job to make the software slower faster than the hardware guys make the hardware faster. </p>
<p>We won.</p>
<p>Seriously, for decades now we&#8217;ve been using more and more hardware resources to make writing and maintaining software easier, quicker and cheaper.  Of course at any given time in the evolution we worked hard to optimize whatever stack there was to get the highest whatever number.  But the stacks kept growing and growing and the hardware jocks kept blowing us away with amazing Moore-ian progress.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time to put a pile of effort into cutting through the amazing layers of generalizing systems to reduce back from millions the number of instructions it takes to echo a darned keystroke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
