<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanoantenna Surprise Discovery Could Make Solar Cells More Efficient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-108573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-108573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did he actually make anything or just have the idea?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he actually make anything or just have the idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-108572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-108572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alvin Marks published this idea decades ago: http://www.rexresearch.com/marks2/marks.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alvin Marks published this idea decades ago: <a href="http://www.rexresearch.com/marks2/marks.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rexresearch.com/marks2/marks.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-108534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-108534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention a new method for harvesting electricity from hot nuclear processes and burning coal, gas and oil ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention a new method for harvesting electricity from hot nuclear processes and burning coal, gas and oil <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-106306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-106306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t try a mensa test, U wouldn&#039;t pass :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t try a mensa test, U wouldn&#8217;t pass <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-106305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-106305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you just hate it when you want to say something but the conversation is over your head?

Burns, don&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you just hate it when you want to say something but the conversation is over your head?</p>
<p>Burns, don&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-106304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-106304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect! End as hostage by the energy companies, just one time investment and maintenance cost - abs brill! Can&#039;t wait to see this out up running in full scale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect! End as hostage by the energy companies, just one time investment and maintenance cost &#8211; abs brill! Can&#8217;t wait to see this out up running in full scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hanlan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-98971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Hanlan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-98971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could this be added as a retrofit to existing photovoltaic panels? What would it cost?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be added as a retrofit to existing photovoltaic panels? What would it cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hanlan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-98972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Hanlan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-98972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could this be added as a retrofit to existing photovoltaic panels? What would it cost?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be added as a retrofit to existing photovoltaic panels? What would it cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/05/09/nanoantenna-surprise-discovery-could-make-solar-cells-more-efficient/#comment-98905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26948#comment-98905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This might lead to a new way to harvest geothermal energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This might lead to a new way to harvest geothermal energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
