<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Cleanest&#8221; and &#8220;Dirtiest&#8221; Internet Data Centers (Yahoo &amp; Google Rock! Apple &amp; Facebook.. not so much)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/#comment-123137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26283#comment-123137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, I have no idea what you are talking about with regards to the old article being reposted. Where was it reposted? Not on this site.

Second of all, I think you are over your head in Apple adoration. I&#039;m a certainly fan of Apple for some things, but certainly not for its environmental legacy so far. And the same goes for Steve Jobs. He was awesome in some arenas and some ways, but he really screwed up in others. Painting him as an angel is completely unrealistic. Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I have no idea what you are talking about with regards to the old article being reposted. Where was it reposted? Not on this site.</p>
<p>Second of all, I think you are over your head in Apple adoration. I&#8217;m a certainly fan of Apple for some things, but certainly not for its environmental legacy so far. And the same goes for Steve Jobs. He was awesome in some arenas and some ways, but he really screwed up in others. Painting him as an angel is completely unrealistic. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Wilkes</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/#comment-123092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley Wilkes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26283#comment-123092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is any &quot;kidding&quot; being done here it would you kidding yourself. Why was the artIcle FROM OVER A YEAR AGO posted at all without some highly visible indication (other that a date in a small font) that the article was posted OVER A YEAR AGO and, further, THE REASON why it was being reposted. You as, director/editor should take responsibility for that. 

I&#039;ve owned Apple computers every year since 1983 and have been indefatigably committed to following Apple&#039;s every move and the concomitant press responses. What I&#039;ve observed over the past 15 years of Apples innovations and rise to the top revenue producing company in the world is the emergence, especially in the media, of Apple Bashers.  

You come across as just another Apple Basher to me. When one bashes Apple they&#039;re also bashing Steve Jobs. No corporate CEO has cared more about the environment, labor laws, workers rights and human rights than Steve Jobs. 

Those in the media, like you, who contend that Apple is &quot;lagging behind the rest of the industry&quot; when it comes to &quot;greening up&quot; come across as arrogant - so much so that  it appears that you believe that somehow you own existence and therefore can present any aspect of it to your audience in any light that is in concert with your biases. 

Director/editor or not, you&#039;ve got a lot to learn about who you are and why you do what you do and why you believe you have some direct conduit to truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any &#8220;kidding&#8221; being done here it would you kidding yourself. Why was the artIcle FROM OVER A YEAR AGO posted at all without some highly visible indication (other that a date in a small font) that the article was posted OVER A YEAR AGO and, further, THE REASON why it was being reposted. You as, director/editor should take responsibility for that. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve owned Apple computers every year since 1983 and have been indefatigably committed to following Apple&#8217;s every move and the concomitant press responses. What I&#8217;ve observed over the past 15 years of Apples innovations and rise to the top revenue producing company in the world is the emergence, especially in the media, of Apple Bashers.  </p>
<p>You come across as just another Apple Basher to me. When one bashes Apple they&#8217;re also bashing Steve Jobs. No corporate CEO has cared more about the environment, labor laws, workers rights and human rights than Steve Jobs. </p>
<p>Those in the media, like you, who contend that Apple is &#8220;lagging behind the rest of the industry&#8221; when it comes to &#8220;greening up&#8221; come across as arrogant &#8211; so much so that  it appears that you believe that somehow you own existence and therefore can present any aspect of it to your audience in any light that is in concert with your biases. </p>
<p>Director/editor or not, you&#8217;ve got a lot to learn about who you are and why you do what you do and why you believe you have some direct conduit to truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/#comment-123085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26283#comment-123085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ashley, are you kidding me? These articles are over 1 year apart. Anyone following this topic would know that Apple has made big changes in that time, but that even its 1 green data center is far from proof the company has greened up. It&#039;s still lagging behind the rest of the industry, but this latest news does bring hope and is definitely welcome news after years of pushing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley, are you kidding me? These articles are over 1 year apart. Anyone following this topic would know that Apple has made big changes in that time, but that even its 1 green data center is far from proof the company has greened up. It&#8217;s still lagging behind the rest of the industry, but this latest news does bring hope and is definitely welcome news after years of pushing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Wilkes</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/#comment-121910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley Wilkes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26283#comment-121910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cleantechnica should apologize.

In the same Cleantechnica newsletter one can fine 2 articles referring to Apple&#039;s efforts to build data centers that use renewable energy. One article headline: IT’S OFFICIAL: 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR MASSIVE APPLE DATA CENTER [Maiden, North Carolina]

Then the title of this article, “CLEANEST” AND “DIRTIEST” INTERNET DATA CENTERS (YAHOO &amp; GOOGLE ROCK! APPLE &amp; FACEBOOK.. NOT SO MUCH) SOURCE: CLEAN TECHNICA (HTTP://S.TT/12UBT)

Then later in the article:

&quot;As indicated in the title, Apple and Facebook are particularly dirty-energy-dependent (AND NOT LOOKING TO CHANGE THAT AS FAR AS ANYONE CAN TELL).
Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/12ubt)&quot;.

This &quot;SNAFU&quot;, or whatever it is, is nothing less than shameful. Who&#039;s running the show at Cleantechnica? Anybody?  If anyone is &quot;running the show&quot; at Cleantechnica I hope they are humble enough to be embarrassed because the apparency is that he or she has serious competency issues.

Cleantechnica should formally apologize to Apple for publishing contradictory stories regarding their commitment to 100%-renewable-energy-use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cleantechnica should apologize.</p>
<p>In the same Cleantechnica newsletter one can fine 2 articles referring to Apple&#8217;s efforts to build data centers that use renewable energy. One article headline: IT’S OFFICIAL: 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR MASSIVE APPLE DATA CENTER [Maiden, North Carolina]</p>
<p>Then the title of this article, “CLEANEST” AND “DIRTIEST” INTERNET DATA CENTERS (YAHOO &amp; GOOGLE ROCK! APPLE &amp; FACEBOOK.. NOT SO MUCH) SOURCE: CLEAN TECHNICA (<a href="http://S.TT/12UBT" rel="nofollow">http://S.TT/12UBT</a>)</p>
<p>Then later in the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;As indicated in the title, Apple and Facebook are particularly dirty-energy-dependent (AND NOT LOOKING TO CHANGE THAT AS FAR AS ANYONE CAN TELL).<br />
Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/12ubt" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/12ubt</a>)&#8221;.</p>
<p>This &#8220;SNAFU&#8221;, or whatever it is, is nothing less than shameful. Who&#8217;s running the show at Cleantechnica? Anybody?  If anyone is &#8220;running the show&#8221; at Cleantechnica I hope they are humble enough to be embarrassed because the apparency is that he or she has serious competency issues.</p>
<p>Cleantechnica should formally apologize to Apple for publishing contradictory stories regarding their commitment to 100%-renewable-energy-use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Center Infographic (+ Opportunities for Efficiency Improvements) &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/28/cleanest-and-dirtiest-internet-data-centers-yahoo-google-rock-apple-facebook-not-so-much/#comment-99409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Data Center Infographic (+ Opportunities for Efficiency Improvements) &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26283#comment-99409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Data centers use a ton of energy, as the infographic below from ABB (&#8220;Powering the cloud&#8221;) will show you. I shared a related infographic on the data centers of the world&#8217;s biggest websites a few weeks ago, which I think was quite interesting and eye-opening, but the infographic below gives us even more perspective and discusses some key recommendations for making data centers more efficient. Check it out if you are interested in this topic and how to improve the efficiency of these tremendous energy consumers (click on the infographic to enlarge it). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Data centers use a ton of energy, as the infographic below from ABB (&#8220;Powering the cloud&#8221;) will show you. I shared a related infographic on the data centers of the world&#8217;s biggest websites a few weeks ago, which I think was quite interesting and eye-opening, but the infographic below gives us even more perspective and discusses some key recommendations for making data centers more efficient. Check it out if you are interested in this topic and how to improve the efficiency of these tremendous energy consumers (click on the infographic to enlarge it). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
