<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of Fuel Economy {Infographic} &amp; More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/history-of-fuel-economy-infographic-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/history-of-fuel-economy-infographic-more/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osten</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/history-of-fuel-economy-infographic-more/#comment-96848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Osten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26002#comment-96848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there&#039;s something wrong with the 1992 and 2007 comparisons. For the Honda Civic at the top of the list the fuel consumption in 1992 is noted as 42 city and 48 highway and as a comparison the 2007 figures for the Honda Civic are 30 city and 40 highway a significant reduction, a 29% deterioration for city and 17% deterioration for highway and yet the comparison percentage is noted as positive 1.5%. This should state -29% for city and -17% for highway. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s something wrong with the 1992 and 2007 comparisons. For the Honda Civic at the top of the list the fuel consumption in 1992 is noted as 42 city and 48 highway and as a comparison the 2007 figures for the Honda Civic are 30 city and 40 highway a significant reduction, a 29% deterioration for city and 17% deterioration for highway and yet the comparison percentage is noted as positive 1.5%. This should state -29% for city and -17% for highway. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
