<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Bags Under the Sea to be Tested to Store Off-Shore Wind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Miller</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-114027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-114027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trick with most sustainable, renewable, perpetual, eternal, power sources, power storage techniques: They cannot support the &quot;Cheap Oil Era&quot; developed, fully unsustainable, extravagant, even preposterous, &quot;American Dream&quot; lifestyle and version of civilisation. Factoid: very few in this world live that way anyway! Some 30% of the 300 M in America ! imagine now for a moment, what these very workable, practical systems mean, not to the few, but to the remaining 7000 M in the world - and you have a more realistic view. 
Canadians in Straw Bale homes consume so little energy as to rely on Passive Solar for heating for the winter. This Straw Bale &quot;Super-insulation technique bears more technical development, and wider use. university of Alberta has a hemp bodied car - no caol no nukes, to weld, form, shapes, steel, no rust, no rot, just a good, solid, light, strong,  utility vehicle body - not even great presses, or rollers needed! Suppressed! Corporately damaging technology! Refused at U.S. borders for a hemp content! Ass-holes fear some may &quot;smoke&quot; a godammit car?
We face an uphill battle against the Corpocracy, and a down hill run as they fail in the U.S.A., as mounting unemployment smacks of genetic selection, as even the AMA jaundiced by reports of poor health care there for the majority bury their guilt in glossy two page colour ads depicting them as &quot;saviours to mankind&quot;. 
University of Manitoba &quot;Stack Wood&quot; housing techniques have not gone un-noticed in Canada either. 
There really is a very comfortable, modern technologies supported,  &quot;Off-Grid&quot; life out there for those who would seek out. Even hidden on the net are many sites revealing newer techniques blened with forgotten older technologies, for a happy life-style apart from the Corporate Monsters, the Great Corporate American Propaganda Whore and her mesmerizations, exhaultations, false declarations, sly innuendoes, and slick plays for your Soul, your cash, and your very life.
hope reigns eternal for a comfortable unfettered lifestyle, unbeholden to the mighty Corporations yet on even their own internet! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trick with most sustainable, renewable, perpetual, eternal, power sources, power storage techniques: They cannot support the &#8220;Cheap Oil Era&#8221; developed, fully unsustainable, extravagant, even preposterous, &#8220;American Dream&#8221; lifestyle and version of civilisation. Factoid: very few in this world live that way anyway! Some 30% of the 300 M in America ! imagine now for a moment, what these very workable, practical systems mean, not to the few, but to the remaining 7000 M in the world &#8211; and you have a more realistic view.<br />
Canadians in Straw Bale homes consume so little energy as to rely on Passive Solar for heating for the winter. This Straw Bale &#8220;Super-insulation technique bears more technical development, and wider use. university of Alberta has a hemp bodied car &#8211; no caol no nukes, to weld, form, shapes, steel, no rust, no rot, just a good, solid, light, strong,  utility vehicle body &#8211; not even great presses, or rollers needed! Suppressed! Corporately damaging technology! Refused at U.S. borders for a hemp content! Ass-holes fear some may &#8220;smoke&#8221; a godammit car?<br />
We face an uphill battle against the Corpocracy, and a down hill run as they fail in the U.S.A., as mounting unemployment smacks of genetic selection, as even the AMA jaundiced by reports of poor health care there for the majority bury their guilt in glossy two page colour ads depicting them as &#8220;saviours to mankind&#8221;.<br />
University of Manitoba &#8220;Stack Wood&#8221; housing techniques have not gone un-noticed in Canada either.<br />
There really is a very comfortable, modern technologies supported,  &#8220;Off-Grid&#8221; life out there for those who would seek out. Even hidden on the net are many sites revealing newer techniques blened with forgotten older technologies, for a happy life-style apart from the Corporate Monsters, the Great Corporate American Propaganda Whore and her mesmerizations, exhaultations, false declarations, sly innuendoes, and slick plays for your Soul, your cash, and your very life.<br />
hope reigns eternal for a comfortable unfettered lifestyle, unbeholden to the mighty Corporations yet on even their own internet! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olmo &#124; Green and Energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-99249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olmo &#124; Green and Energy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-99249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Cool, the world need more of this technologies. but now... not in &quot;the future&quot;

olmo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Cool, the world need more of this technologies. but now&#8230; not in &#8220;the future&#8221;</p>
<p>olmo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Swift</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Swift]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan - how are they being anchored? That is a huge issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan &#8211; how are they being anchored? That is a huge issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel a need to clarify...

The reason that I clicked on &#039;Liked&#039; is because Susan responded back and in such a nice way.  I appreciate it when people who write articles engage with commentators.  

I&#039;ve got no opinion on Susan&#039;s sentences.  I just like the good info she and the other authors bring to the site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel a need to clarify&#8230;</p>
<p>The reason that I clicked on &#8216;Liked&#8217; is because Susan responded back and in such a nice way.  I appreciate it when people who write articles engage with commentators.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got no opinion on Susan&#8217;s sentences.  I just like the good info she and the other authors bring to the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anumakonda Jagadeesh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anumakonda Jagadeesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Innovation to store offshore wind energy through bags under the sea. I am glad more and more approaches to harness wind energy are coming up.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Innovation to store offshore wind energy through bags under the sea. I am glad more and more approaches to harness wind energy are coming up.</p>
<p>Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India<br />
Wind Energy Expert<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com">anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went back and de goofed it a bit, hope I wrangled some sense out of it. 
I was really trying to compare it to the simple natural force of gravity used in releasing the stored energy in pumped storage. 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went back and de goofed it a bit, hope I wrangled some sense out of it.<br />
I was really trying to compare it to the simple natural force of gravity used in releasing the stored energy in pumped storage. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That makes sense. So its just a one time cost to build it, not for every kwh stored. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense. So its just a one time cost to build it, not for every kwh stored. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me copy something over from a GMT article...

&quot;The Ionex Energy Storage System is a 1-megawatt-hour unit capable of producing 1 megawatt or 2 megawatts of continuous AC power from a 40-foot shipping container weighing 35,000 kilograms. The container can be mounted on a concrete pad or on a wheeled trailer.

....

We think two-hour systems will be about $1,200 per kilowatt.&quot; But he stressed that &quot;we really need to see a fully installed system under $300 to $400 per kilowatt-hour.&quot;&quot;

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/ionex-has-a-1-mw-battery-ready-for-the-grid/

And from another GMT piece about Duke Energy contracting with Xtreme Power to provide a 36MWh storage system for its 153-megawatt wind farm in Notrees, Texas...

... he has confidence that Xtreme could one day get its prices down to $500 a kilowatt hour, or less than flow batteries and sodiums, but Xtreme is not near that price now. &quot;

$16/kWh would be an extreme breakthrough in storage.

Remember, that&#039;s the cost of the facility.  It&#039;s not what storage would add to the cost of a delivered kWh of electricity.  The facility would get used over and over and over....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me copy something over from a GMT article&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Ionex Energy Storage System is a 1-megawatt-hour unit capable of producing 1 megawatt or 2 megawatts of continuous AC power from a 40-foot shipping container weighing 35,000 kilograms. The container can be mounted on a concrete pad or on a wheeled trailer.</p>
<p>&#8230;.</p>
<p>We think two-hour systems will be about $1,200 per kilowatt.&#8221; But he stressed that &#8220;we really need to see a fully installed system under $300 to $400 per kilowatt-hour.&#8221;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/ionex-has-a-1-mw-battery-ready-for-the-grid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/ionex-has-a-1-mw-battery-ready-for-the-grid/</a></p>
<p>And from another GMT piece about Duke Energy contracting with Xtreme Power to provide a 36MWh storage system for its 153-megawatt wind farm in Notrees, Texas&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; he has confidence that Xtreme could one day get its prices down to $500 a kilowatt hour, or less than flow batteries and sodiums, but Xtreme is not near that price now. &#8221;</p>
<p>$16/kWh would be an extreme breakthrough in storage.</p>
<p>Remember, that&#8217;s the cost of the facility.  It&#8217;s not what storage would add to the cost of a delivered kWh of electricity.  The facility would get used over and over and over&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I tend to think it is $0.16 per KWh too, but I wasn&#039;t able to confirm with the editor of Power Mag, who I am quoting Prof Garvey as saying. Elsewhere - and a few years ago, Garvey said $20 per MWh, which is even more evidence that it would not be so high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I tend to think it is $0.16 per KWh too, but I wasn&#8217;t able to confirm with the editor of Power Mag, who I am quoting Prof Garvey as saying. Elsewhere &#8211; and a few years ago, Garvey said $20 per MWh, which is even more evidence that it would not be so high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell me about it! Many of my sentences are clunky...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me about it! Many of my sentences are clunky&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Read</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roderick Read]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pumping air to depth takes huge energy... an alternative.  Send the power to the bottom in electric cables. Use the electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. You now have two very valuable resources at industrial working pressure. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pumping air to depth takes huge energy&#8230; an alternative.  Send the power to the bottom in electric cables. Use the electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. You now have two very valuable resources at industrial working pressure. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This storage technique would seem to have an advantage over CAES in a salt dome or other underground location.  As the stored air is used there will be no decrease in pressure as the ocean above will fill in the now-vacated space.

This also suggests onshore storage possibilities.  Drill a modest-sized well very deep and then excavate a large underground area.  Install air bags in the excavated area and then flood the area above the storage bags.  Going deep underground also means storing air at hotter temperatures.

Even using abandoned mines (which are often naturally flooded) might provide storage opportunities.  They probably already transmission lines running to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This storage technique would seem to have an advantage over CAES in a salt dome or other underground location.  As the stored air is used there will be no decrease in pressure as the ocean above will fill in the now-vacated space.</p>
<p>This also suggests onshore storage possibilities.  Drill a modest-sized well very deep and then excavate a large underground area.  Install air bags in the excavated area and then flood the area above the storage bags.  Going deep underground also means storing air at hotter temperatures.</p>
<p>Even using abandoned mines (which are often naturally flooded) might provide storage opportunities.  They probably already transmission lines running to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan, this sentence is quite clunky:

&quot;these huge inflatable undersea bags would also use the relentless power of compression found deep under the sea, to make energy as the sea is allowed to compress the bags air forced under the sea.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, this sentence is quite clunky:</p>
<p>&#8220;these huge inflatable undersea bags would also use the relentless power of compression found deep under the sea, to make energy as the sea is allowed to compress the bags air forced under the sea.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikodean1</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/18/energy-bags-under-the-sea-to-be-tested-to-store-off-shore-wind/#comment-96428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikodean1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=26019#comment-96428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sure it is $16/lWh? Or 16 cents?

$16 sounds very extreme. I don&#039;t think it can be that expensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure it is $16/lWh? Or 16 cents?</p>
<p>$16 sounds very extreme. I don&#8217;t think it can be that expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
