<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home with Insulated Panels and Geothermal Will Use Half the Electricity, No Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Sims</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-153243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Sims]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-153243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But vary limited thermal mass.

See http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/index.html
Comparative analysis of sixteen different material configurations showed that the most effective wall assembly was the wall with thermal mass (concrete) applied in good contact with the interior of the building. Walls where the insulation material was concentrated on the interior side, performed much worse. Wall configurations with the concrete wall core and insulation placed on both sides of the wall performed slightly better, however, their performance was significantly worse than walls containing foam core and concrete shells on both sides.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But vary limited thermal mass.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/index.html</a><br />
Comparative analysis of sixteen different material configurations showed that the most effective wall assembly was the wall with thermal mass (concrete) applied in good contact with the interior of the building. Walls where the insulation material was concentrated on the interior side, performed much worse. Wall configurations with the concrete wall core and insulation placed on both sides of the wall performed slightly better, however, their performance was significantly worse than walls containing foam core and concrete shells on both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chi</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-153217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-153217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks really similar to the Tridipanels in S. CA.  
www.tridipanel.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks really similar to the Tridipanels in S. CA.<br />
<a href="http://www.tridipanel.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tridipanel.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scip Panel Buildings</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-143047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scip Panel Buildings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-143047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some big differences between ICF and SCIP is it you do not protect the exterior like SCIP System&#039;s you will not have the fire rating. Without thermal mass material on the interior side you do not take advantage of the flywheel effect of thermal mass.

Check out Oak Ridge nationals Labs study of 16 different wall configurations including ICF, SIP and SCIP.

Thermal Mass - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/.../thermal/index.html 
Go to  CONCLUSIONS
Taken from report
(Comparative analysis of sixteen different material configurations showed that the most effective wall assembly was the wall with thermal mass (concrete) applied in good contact with the interior of the building. Walls where the insulation material was concentrated on the interior side, performed much worse. Wall configurations with the concrete wall core and insulation placed on both sides of the wall performed slightly better, however, their performance was significantly worse than walls containing foam core and concrete shells on both sides.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some big differences between ICF and SCIP is it you do not protect the exterior like SCIP System&#8217;s you will not have the fire rating. Without thermal mass material on the interior side you do not take advantage of the flywheel effect of thermal mass.</p>
<p>Check out Oak Ridge nationals Labs study of 16 different wall configurations including ICF, SIP and SCIP.</p>
<p>Thermal Mass &#8211; Oak Ridge National Laboratory<br />
<a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/.../thermal/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/research/&#8230;/thermal/index.html</a><br />
Go to  CONCLUSIONS<br />
Taken from report<br />
(Comparative analysis of sixteen different material configurations showed that the most effective wall assembly was the wall with thermal mass (concrete) applied in good contact with the interior of the building. Walls where the insulation material was concentrated on the interior side, performed much worse. Wall configurations with the concrete wall core and insulation placed on both sides of the wall performed slightly better, however, their performance was significantly worse than walls containing foam core and concrete shells on both sides.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett Enterprises</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-143044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrett Enterprises]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-143044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Building with ICF, using ICF coatings they can be zero maintance, eco-friendly and disaster resistant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building with ICF, using ICF coatings they can be zero maintance, eco-friendly and disaster resistant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-111342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-111342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We did not attempt to build truly passive home on a 25&#039; wide lot with zero setback on sides.
I did turn the heat off for the past three weeks this winter and the heat never dropped below 60 degrees. Inside the house the interior walls where the sun hits were as warm as 82 in the late afternoon warming the house through out.
The thermal mass combined with a thermal break is what makes the difference. Before the windows were installed and after the interior shotcrete was shot the heating fuel need dropped by 70%.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did not attempt to build truly passive home on a 25&#8242; wide lot with zero setback on sides.<br />
I did turn the heat off for the past three weeks this winter and the heat never dropped below 60 degrees. Inside the house the interior walls where the sun hits were as warm as 82 in the late afternoon warming the house through out.<br />
The thermal mass combined with a thermal break is what makes the difference. Before the windows were installed and after the interior shotcrete was shot the heating fuel need dropped by 70%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/08/home-with-insulated-panels-and-geothermal-will-use-half-the-electricity-no-gas/#comment-96110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=25496#comment-96110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, yes, yes, but does it meet passivhaus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, yes, but does it meet passivhaus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
