<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saudi Arabia says it Deserves Share in $100 billion International Climate Change Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/#comment-95806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=23026#comment-95806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Good covered point, lots of people simply put something weired theories in front of public.
 But it doesn’t work i think because know one sure how it will going to happen 
It looks like just coping ideas which someone has already written. I found even on 
popular blogs guest bloggers bring same theories which I already know. I observed they
 just try to spice up their article without knowing what really audience want to read.

Thanks

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optiontips.in/&quot; title=&quot;Stock tips&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stock tips&lt;/a&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good covered point, lots of people simply put something weired theories in front of public.<br />
 But it doesn’t work i think because know one sure how it will going to happen<br />
It looks like just coping ideas which someone has already written. I found even on<br />
popular blogs guest bloggers bring same theories which I already know. I observed they<br />
 just try to spice up their article without knowing what really audience want to read.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p><a href="http://www.optiontips.in/" title="Stock tips" rel="nofollow">Stock tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saudi Arabia says it Deserves Share in $100 billion International Climate Change Fund &#8212; Oil Rig Careers &#38; News</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/#comment-93381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia says it Deserves Share in $100 billion International Climate Change Fund &#8212; Oil Rig Careers &#38; News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=23026#comment-93381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Saudi Arabia needs special treatment in the disbursement of funds from the $100 billion climate change adaptation fund, this is the proposal that the country has submitted to the United Nations. Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter, says that it faces economic vulnerability due to fluctuations in the global oil prices. Decision to form an international climate&#8230; Read More&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Saudi Arabia needs special treatment in the disbursement of funds from the $100 billion climate change adaptation fund, this is the proposal that the country has submitted to the United Nations. Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter, says that it faces economic vulnerability due to fluctuations in the global oil prices. Decision to form an international climate&#8230; Read More&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Robson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/#comment-93082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Robson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=23026#comment-93082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a formula that governs International Climate Change Fund disbursements?
For instance,Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are extremely vulnerable to sea level rise, should they therefore take preference over Saudi Arabia?
And what about SIDS that are colonies? Many SIDS, because their colonial affiliations are considered as being Annex 1 countries, and there is no way that they can be considered Annex 1 states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a formula that governs International Climate Change Fund disbursements?<br />
For instance,Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are extremely vulnerable to sea level rise, should they therefore take preference over Saudi Arabia?<br />
And what about SIDS that are colonies? Many SIDS, because their colonial affiliations are considered as being Annex 1 countries, and there is no way that they can be considered Annex 1 states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMaxx</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/#comment-92890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMaxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=23026#comment-92890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a bloody lot of rubbish!  As major contributors to the problem they should be paying a large part of the $100B not having their hands out.  If they won&#039;t spend their profits on getting ready for not being oil giants instead of on Rolls Royces, palaces, parties, gold etc then tough luck boyo&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bloody lot of rubbish!  As major contributors to the problem they should be paying a large part of the $100B not having their hands out.  If they won&#8217;t spend their profits on getting ready for not being oil giants instead of on Rolls Royces, palaces, parties, gold etc then tough luck boyo&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john bailo</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/20/saudi-arabia-says-it-deserves-share-in-100-billion-international-climate-change-fund/#comment-92875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john bailo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=23026#comment-92875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A joke right?  

You&#039;ve already got a family of 200 taking in 20 percent of all oil revenues and they want more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A joke right?  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve already got a family of 200 taking in 20 percent of all oil revenues and they want more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
