No you can’t. You can only show shrill and stupidly dishonest religious rhetoric of the climate deniers. And you’re probably one of the denier-bots that we read about here

http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/20/denier-bots-live-why-are-online-comments-sections-over-run-by-the-anti-science-pro-pollution-crowd/

You mean trouble like this:

– Spain Generated 3% of its Electricity from Solar in 2010. Despite the solar fallout, Spanish solar systems are delivering billions of kilowatt-hours to the country. Wind power is now bigger than hydro and coal in the country. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/01/spain-generated-3-of-its-electricity-from-solar-in-2010?cmpid=rss

– In 2010, renewable energy met 35% of Spanish demand and was even exported to France. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/dec/28/spain-renewables-energy-electricity-france

Imagine how much “trouble” they will be in 5, 10, 20 years as their energy is increasingly supplied by clean, safe, never-ending renewable energy that makes them completely independent from other countries and completely insulated from rising fossil fuel prices?

Thanks for your fascinating opinion – but where is it wrong?

The IPCC produces a synthesis of the best science available and is accepted and supported by *every* national science academy on the planet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

Global warming is fact – and only disputed by cranks and paid liars.

I have solar on my own house. No great investigation needed. It works. I used to have electric bills of about $110, this month’s? $4.89.

Yet there has been no investigation to prove any technologies like wind and solar will work. Look at the trouble Spain is in.

I can point you to countless religious rhetoric of the climate wackos and show you how shrill and preaching it is

That is incorrect. The IPCC reports are generated by a staff of just over 50 bureaucrats, many of whom do not have any scientific training at all. Those ‘thousands of scientists’ write papers that go into the reports, but they aren’t directly associated with the UN.

The IPCC is a political organization, not a scientific organization.

> The IPPC summaries are updated every 3 or 4 years.

It’s 6 or 7 years. Also, typo IPPC -> IPCC.