<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Clean Air Act Rules Could Create 1.5 Million Jobs, Study Finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-113313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-113313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These industries are sitting on boatloads of cash. And as we&#039;ve let the country&#039;s richest rake in more and more money on the backs (and health) of common citizens, they have not created jobs but hoarded more and more of the money.

Your claim that they would lay off more people than are hired is unsubstantiated, and even utility companies will tell you that&#039;s not true. In most cases, they don&#039;t need to lay off anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These industries are sitting on boatloads of cash. And as we&#8217;ve let the country&#8217;s richest rake in more and more money on the backs (and health) of common citizens, they have not created jobs but hoarded more and more of the money.</p>
<p>Your claim that they would lay off more people than are hired is unsubstantiated, and even utility companies will tell you that&#8217;s not true. In most cases, they don&#8217;t need to lay off anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim213</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-113310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim213]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-113310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making companies pay for something just because the Feds changed the rules does create jobs if the companies decide to stay in the USA but it cuts into their profits . The companies then will have to lay people off to pay for the new Green Job !  Nice try obama but it won&#039;t work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making companies pay for something just because the Feds changed the rules does create jobs if the companies decide to stay in the USA but it cuts into their profits . The companies then will have to lay people off to pay for the new Green Job !  Nice try obama but it won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looming Issues with EPA Budget Cuts &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-98514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looming Issues with EPA Budget Cuts &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 05:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-98514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are portrayed as a hindrance to both business revenue and unemployment (something that is absolutely not true except for a small minority of people), the health risks associated with no environmental [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] are portrayed as a hindrance to both business revenue and unemployment (something that is absolutely not true except for a small minority of people), the health risks associated with no environmental [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-90672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-90672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[look in the report. the details of the jobs are in there..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look in the report. the details of the jobs are in there..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g...</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-90415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g...]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-90415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curious.  What are these 290k people going to be doing year round?  
Also, who is going to be able to afford the more expensive energy these plants will produce?

You may balk at fossil fuels but the reality is they are a lot less expensive.  For a business to be profitable, the energy costs must be such that they weigh into the competitive model.

I&#039;m not in the fossil fuel business.  I am in the construction business.  There is a big push to use &quot;green&quot; materials.  In most cases, only the govt projects I do can afford it.  My private clients choose traditional materials because they are more affordable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious.  What are these 290k people going to be doing year round?<br />
Also, who is going to be able to afford the more expensive energy these plants will produce?</p>
<p>You may balk at fossil fuels but the reality is they are a lot less expensive.  For a business to be profitable, the energy costs must be such that they weigh into the competitive model.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not in the fossil fuel business.  I am in the construction business.  There is a big push to use &#8220;green&#8221; materials.  In most cases, only the govt projects I do can afford it.  My private clients choose traditional materials because they are more affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention New Clean Air Act Rules Could Create 1.5 Million Jobs, Study Finds – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/11/new-clean-air-act-rules-could-create-1-5-million-jobs-study-finds/#comment-88960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention New Clean Air Act Rules Could Create 1.5 Million Jobs, Study Finds – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22649#comment-88960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Green Economy Post, CleanTechnica and CleanTechnica, Zachary Shahan. Zachary Shahan said: New Clean Air Act Rules Could Create 1.5 Million Jobs, Study Finds http://su.pr/9SNe9f [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Green Economy Post, CleanTechnica and CleanTechnica, Zachary Shahan. Zachary Shahan said: New Clean Air Act Rules Could Create 1.5 Million Jobs, Study Finds <a href="http://su.pr/9SNe9f" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/9SNe9f</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
