<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Efficient Molybdenite Chips Could Use 100,000 Times Less Energy on Standby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/01/energy-efficient-molybdenite-chips-could-use-100000-times-less-energy-on-standby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/01/energy-efficient-molybdenite-chips-could-use-100000-times-less-energy-on-standby/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: usLEDsupply staff</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/02/01/energy-efficient-molybdenite-chips-could-use-100000-times-less-energy-on-standby/#comment-83630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[usLEDsupply staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=22264#comment-83630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like a neat and exciting development!  However, using graphene is probably the better option, because there is a possibility that it can be made from sugar (renewable resource).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a neat and exciting development!  However, using graphene is probably the better option, because there is a possibility that it can be made from sugar (renewable resource).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
