“I imagine part of the reason these energy experts favor such policies is that they see them as job creators; they recognize that the shift such policies produce will improve their countries’ energy independence and national security; and they recognize the inherent, natural limits of relying on traditional forms of energy like coal.”

This is what the survey says. Be very clear on the words:

This is leading many in the sector to see energy efficiency and renewable energy as underutilized—perhaps critical—options for powering a global society with an insatiable thirst for cheaper, cleaner energy. That probably explains why a majority of energy professionals believe in the importance of government action
to incentivize cleaner and smarter technologies. In a world where demand is perpetually on the increase, helping consumers to increase the adoption of energy efficiency and renewables would seem to be a natural next step for an ever more thirsty global energy system.”

No where do they even infer that “coal” is limited or bad. In fact if you read it clearly they are saying energy efficiency and renewables are needed to help an ever more thirsty global energy system. In fact many studies have shown coal has more than 400 years of supply in the USA at going rates, not limited in the short run. That you state some European countries are retiring coal does not infer what may be the best mix in the USA. If you look at China the Renewable champs you will find they are building all types of power plants at record rates including coal and nuclear. Are they wrong on coal and nuclear when you infer they are so right on renewables??? Me thinks they have the right approach all around as each type of power has a place in the mix for a energy hungry world.