<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Got Over 1/4 of Its Electricity from Clean Energy in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-79598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-79598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry Le Due: while China may be increasing its coal usage, it is clearly steaming ahead in regards to clean energy. you don&#039;t need to see a report to know it, they have plenty of real-world humungo projects. the data (assuming it is fairly accurate) is interesting to look at, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Le Due: while China may be increasing its coal usage, it is clearly steaming ahead in regards to clean energy. you don&#8217;t need to see a report to know it, they have plenty of real-world humungo projects. the data (assuming it is fairly accurate) is interesting to look at, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-79590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-79590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, the businesses have to be practical, though. Until the U.S. creates a more clean-energy-supportive economy, China is going to inevitably pull some jobs. It is going so much faster to promote clean energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the businesses have to be practical, though. Until the U.S. creates a more clean-energy-supportive economy, China is going to inevitably pull some jobs. It is going so much faster to promote clean energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WV Treehugger</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-78237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WV Treehugger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-78237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not forget that have taken over 1/2 if not more of US jobs also. A US Solar panel maker just laid off over 200 workers and are moving to China. I&#039;m all for clean energy in any country but when it takes our jobs,it upsets me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that have taken over 1/2 if not more of US jobs also. A US Solar panel maker just laid off over 200 workers and are moving to China. I&#8217;m all for clean energy in any country but when it takes our jobs,it upsets me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Poised for Wind and Solar Power Boom &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-77973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.S. Poised for Wind and Solar Power Boom &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-77973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] EnergyChina Got Over 1/4 of Its Electricity from Clean Energy in...    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] EnergyChina Got Over 1/4 of Its Electricity from Clean Energy in&#8230;    [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Le Due</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-77650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Le Due]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-77650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another classic example of China &quot;cooking the books&quot;. What a load of pure BS ! China tells its people what to do, how to do it and when to do it and now are telling you what they want you to believe. Pure bunk ! What about the install rate of one new coal fired power plant every week ? You do the math on how much RE it takes to equal 25% of this polluting source. Maybe they think you belive in &quot;clean coal&quot; as RE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another classic example of China &#8220;cooking the books&#8221;. What a load of pure BS ! China tells its people what to do, how to do it and when to do it and now are telling you what they want you to believe. Pure bunk ! What about the install rate of one new coal fired power plant every week ? You do the math on how much RE it takes to equal 25% of this polluting source. Maybe they think you belive in &#8220;clean coal&#8221; as RE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-77028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-77028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dukejohns, good additional points. I think the main issue these days is climate change, since that will create hardships like we&#039;ve never seen if not at least slowed soon. But your point that there are other problems caused by hydro that need to be considered and addressed is an important one]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dukejohns, good additional points. I think the main issue these days is climate change, since that will create hardships like we&#8217;ve never seen if not at least slowed soon. But your point that there are other problems caused by hydro that need to be considered and addressed is an important one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-77027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-77027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the extra comments, Bill. i definitely have my hesitations about both as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the extra comments, Bill. i definitely have my hesitations about both as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-77026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-77026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, same here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, same here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-76868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-76868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impressive transformation.

I hope they keep up this pace and reach the 33% ratio in 2015.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive transformation.</p>
<p>I hope they keep up this pace and reach the 33% ratio in 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hewitt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-76822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Hewitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-76822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m delighted, as we all should be, that China is serious about renewable energy.  Their progress on wind and solar is breathtaking.  Some caveats, though:  I would hesitate to call nuclear renewable and it&#039;s most certainly not clean.  (http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/category/nuclear-power/)  As to big hydro, it&#039;s renewable - if the water doesn&#039;t run out when the Himalayas melt - but there are any number of environmental concerns, including habitat loss, the production of massive amounts of methane, mercury migrating into fish, etc. (http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/technology_and_impacts/energy_technologies/how-hydroelectric-energy.html#Environmental_Concerns)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m delighted, as we all should be, that China is serious about renewable energy.  Their progress on wind and solar is breathtaking.  Some caveats, though:  I would hesitate to call nuclear renewable and it&#8217;s most certainly not clean.  (<a href="http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/category/nuclear-power/" rel="nofollow">http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/category/nuclear-power/</a>)  As to big hydro, it&#8217;s renewable &#8211; if the water doesn&#8217;t run out when the Himalayas melt &#8211; but there are any number of environmental concerns, including habitat loss, the production of massive amounts of methane, mercury migrating into fish, etc. (<a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/technology_and_impacts/energy_technologies/how-hydroelectric-energy.html#Environmental_Concerns" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/technology_and_impacts/energy_technologies/how-hydroelectric-energy.html#Environmental_Concerns</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-76787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-76787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on, everyone knows that you simply just cannot believe what the Chinese government says......well, at least every Chinese knows that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, everyone knows that you simply just cannot believe what the Chinese government says&#8230;&#8230;well, at least every Chinese knows that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukejohns</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-76599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dukejohns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 04:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-76599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of China&#039;s &quot;clean energy&quot; seems to be coming from hydroelectric power. This means dams to create the water power to generate this electricity. There seems to be not concern with the hardships this has created for the Chinese people and the towns/cities destroyed by the water back-up. I realize that clean energy is going to require a lot of changes if it is going to work, but we also need to be mindful of the human costs involved also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of China&#8217;s &#8220;clean energy&#8221; seems to be coming from hydroelectric power. This means dams to create the water power to generate this electricity. There seems to be not concern with the hardships this has created for the Chinese people and the towns/cities destroyed by the water back-up. I realize that clean energy is going to require a lot of changes if it is going to work, but we also need to be mindful of the human costs involved also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freebeazy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/18/china-got-over-14-of-its-electricity-from-clean-energy-in-2010/#comment-76503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freebeazy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21723#comment-76503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the odds that these numbers are accurate? China isn&#039;t really known for their honest reporting, which invariably comes from a non-third party government agency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the odds that these numbers are accurate? China isn&#8217;t really known for their honest reporting, which invariably comes from a non-third party government agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
