<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filibuster Reform: Is It on the Way? What Does it Mean for Cleantech?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/11/filibuster-reform-is-it-on-the-way-what-does-it-mean-for-cleantech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/11/filibuster-reform-is-it-on-the-way-what-does-it-mean-for-cleantech/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Teaches Bush How to Create Jobs, Creates More in 2010 than Bush Did in 8 Years &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/11/filibuster-reform-is-it-on-the-way-what-does-it-mean-for-cleantech/#comment-73943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama Teaches Bush How to Create Jobs, Creates More in 2010 than Bush Did in 8 Years &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21461#comment-73943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] million jobs were created in 2010 under the Obama administration and a Democratic (though, severely obstructed) Congress. That&#8217;s more than the 1 million jobs the Bush administration created in total in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] million jobs were created in 2010 under the Obama administration and a Democratic (though, severely obstructed) Congress. That&#8217;s more than the 1 million jobs the Bush administration created in total in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt7195</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/11/filibuster-reform-is-it-on-the-way-what-does-it-mean-for-cleantech/#comment-73636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt7195]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21461#comment-73636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Everyone,

I don&#039;t want to interrupt a productive exchange on what we can do to help our planet.

But I want to ask everyone to join me in commenting on the posts on Climate Denier Blogs like: www.wattsupwiththat.com and www.globalclimatescam.com and www.climatechangedispatch.com and www.cbn.com and www.globalwarmingcause.com.  Pretty much any site you can find that is spreading misinformation about climate change.

Here&#039;s what I&#039;ve posted.  I urge you to also post this on these sites.  The more this comment shows up, the more people will remember it.  Climate deniers don&#039;t come to our sites, so we have to go to them:

--Begin Quote--

We should believe scientists. In fact, we have to, because they have studied this stuff much longer than we ever could. We’re going to either have to believe the scientists that work for the universities or the scientists that work for the energy companies.

Why would a university scientist have our best interests in mind any more or less than a BP scientist, a Koch Industries scientist or an Exxon scientist?

What would they have to gain from trying to convince everyone that the fuel that everyone including them depends on is running low and is changing our atmosphere for the worse?

It would take a conspiracy theory bigger than a faked moon landing, a covered up alien invasion and a fake 9/11 combined to solve this question on a global scale.

Or it could just be that the money the fossil fuel companies like Koch Industries give to scientists is enough to make them say what they want. Would you say that the Earth is flat for $5 million?

---End Quote---

I wish you all the best.  Please get this out there.  If you can improve the comment, do.  I wish us all the best!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everyone,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to interrupt a productive exchange on what we can do to help our planet.</p>
<p>But I want to ask everyone to join me in commenting on the posts on Climate Denier Blogs like: <a href="http://www.wattsupwiththat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wattsupwiththat.com</a> and <a href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalclimatescam.com</a> and <a href="http://www.climatechangedispatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatechangedispatch.com</a> and <a href="http://www.cbn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbn.com</a> and <a href="http://www.globalwarmingcause.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarmingcause.com</a>.  Pretty much any site you can find that is spreading misinformation about climate change.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve posted.  I urge you to also post this on these sites.  The more this comment shows up, the more people will remember it.  Climate deniers don&#8217;t come to our sites, so we have to go to them:</p>
<p>&#8211;Begin Quote&#8211;</p>
<p>We should believe scientists. In fact, we have to, because they have studied this stuff much longer than we ever could. We’re going to either have to believe the scientists that work for the universities or the scientists that work for the energy companies.</p>
<p>Why would a university scientist have our best interests in mind any more or less than a BP scientist, a Koch Industries scientist or an Exxon scientist?</p>
<p>What would they have to gain from trying to convince everyone that the fuel that everyone including them depends on is running low and is changing our atmosphere for the worse?</p>
<p>It would take a conspiracy theory bigger than a faked moon landing, a covered up alien invasion and a fake 9/11 combined to solve this question on a global scale.</p>
<p>Or it could just be that the money the fossil fuel companies like Koch Industries give to scientists is enough to make them say what they want. Would you say that the Earth is flat for $5 million?</p>
<p>&#8212;End Quote&#8212;</p>
<p>I wish you all the best.  Please get this out there.  If you can improve the comment, do.  I wish us all the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Filibuster Reform: Is It on the Way? What Does it Mean for Cleantech? – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/11/filibuster-reform-is-it-on-the-way-what-does-it-mean-for-cleantech/#comment-73613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Filibuster Reform: Is It on the Way? What Does it Mean for Cleantech? – CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=21461#comment-73613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Green Economy Post and others. Green Economy Post said: Filibuster Reform: Is It on the Way? What Does it Mean for Cleantech? http://bit.ly/fISgkQ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Green Economy Post and others. Green Economy Post said: Filibuster Reform: Is It on the Way? What Does it Mean for Cleantech? <a href="http://bit.ly/fISgkQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fISgkQ</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
