<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA Takes a Look at the Jet Stream to Get 50 Times More Wind Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonEMitchell</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-127107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DonEMitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-127107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hello Dr. Jagadeesh, and J. Hiddink,

I believe J.H. is referring to optimization of the asymmetric capacitor thrust effect by using his U. S. Patented &#039;Capacitance Changer&#039;.

T. T. Brown&#039;s duplication...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=490XJk053TY

J.H.&#039;s Capacitance Changer is capable of generating 500 megavolt pulses, a voltage converted from a plasma capacitor --when it turns off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hello Dr. Jagadeesh, and J. Hiddink,</p>
<p>I believe J.H. is referring to optimization of the asymmetric capacitor thrust effect by using his U. S. Patented &#8216;Capacitance Changer&#8217;.</p>
<p>T. T. Brown&#8217;s duplication&#8230;<br />
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='600' height='368' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/490XJk053TY?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>J.H.&#8217;s Capacitance Changer is capable of generating 500 megavolt pulses, a voltage converted from a plasma capacitor &#8211;when it turns off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kunkiw</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-73002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Kunkiw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-73002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan. 10. 2011

I am so happy to know NASA emailsite.

I have been looking for Solid State Generator device.

Please advice me if you could help me. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan. 10. 2011</p>
<p>I am so happy to know NASA emailsite.</p>
<p>I have been looking for Solid State Generator device.</p>
<p>Please advice me if you could help me. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Akau</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-71126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Akau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-71126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest that land based wind farms at high altitudes might best be built near the top of tall mountains. The requirements would be that the mountain have a road to bring materials and construction equipment up and a transmission line to bring the power down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest that land based wind farms at high altitudes might best be built near the top of tall mountains. The requirements would be that the mountain have a road to bring materials and construction equipment up and a transmission line to bring the power down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McMillan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-70132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McMillan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-70132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This all looks great in theory but on paper it just won&#039;t work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This all looks great in theory but on paper it just won&#8217;t work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hiddink</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-70113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Hiddink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-70113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only is it BS, Nasa does not know, that the jet stream moves all over the place. It seems to be a Golden Handshake for some guy who would be out of work otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is it BS, Nasa does not know, that the jet stream moves all over the place. It seems to be a Golden Handshake for some guy who would be out of work otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hiddink</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-70108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Hiddink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-70108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nasa still owes me $50 million for the technology of the Flying Saucer, which was screwed up by incompetent Propulsion Engineers in Cleveland, Ohio. (They caused the big black-out of 2003 !).
I will develop safely the system of tapping energy out of the aether like a Saucer does and what was probably used by Tesla for his Pierce Arrow Car in 1931.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nasa still owes me $50 million for the technology of the Flying Saucer, which was screwed up by incompetent Propulsion Engineers in Cleveland, Ohio. (They caused the big black-out of 2003 !).<br />
I will develop safely the system of tapping energy out of the aether like a Saucer does and what was probably used by Tesla for his Pierce Arrow Car in 1931.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandro kensan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-70000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandro kensan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-70000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2wwWLFGneY

STEM video, STEM is a prototipe of a first Kitegen. The video show the plant with a kite on air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2wwWLFGneY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2wwWLFGneY</a></p>
<p>STEM video, STEM is a prototipe of a first Kitegen. The video show the plant with a kite on air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.A.Jagadeesh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr.A.Jagadeesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea looks exciting on paper? But at what cost? Lightning also produces enormous power. But when to expect lightning? Even OFF SHORE WIND FARMS are to catch up in Developing countries? Such research may be luxury for NASA but there are other forms which can bring energy at affordable price.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore (AP), India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
Blog: www.drjagadeeshncda.blogspot.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea looks exciting on paper? But at what cost? Lightning also produces enormous power. But when to expect lightning? Even OFF SHORE WIND FARMS are to catch up in Developing countries? Such research may be luxury for NASA but there are other forms which can bring energy at affordable price.</p>
<p>Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore (AP), India<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com">anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com</a><br />
Blog: <a href="http://www.drjagadeeshncda.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.drjagadeeshncda.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul, the technology is not yet invented. All as yet uninvented technology is &quot;complete BS&quot; until it is invented. 

(But, for example, solar in space will use microwave power to transmit it to earth-based receivers. Possibly wind power can be sent by microwave) 

However it finally gets invented - the wind is up there. We need the power down here. We are nothing if not inventive. Yes, it is an outside chance. 

The $100K is not to devise an as-yet uninvented technology, but to handle finding the best site for sharing the airspace, so we narrow down where to site (and therefor, how to design) the technology, enabling some wind inventor to devise the technology. That part will take more than $100K.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, the technology is not yet invented. All as yet uninvented technology is &#8220;complete BS&#8221; until it is invented. </p>
<p>(But, for example, solar in space will use microwave power to transmit it to earth-based receivers. Possibly wind power can be sent by microwave) </p>
<p>However it finally gets invented &#8211; the wind is up there. We need the power down here. We are nothing if not inventive. Yes, it is an outside chance. </p>
<p>The $100K is not to devise an as-yet uninvented technology, but to handle finding the best site for sharing the airspace, so we narrow down where to site (and therefor, how to design) the technology, enabling some wind inventor to devise the technology. That part will take more than $100K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 13:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $100K &#039;investment&#039; shows how low priority this research is. The entire idea is complete BS.

1) A tether 10km long that is able to conduct MW&#039;s worth of energy would weigh 100s of tons! 2) A MW range generator weighs 10s of tons. 3) To lift just 200 ton requires a craft the size of the Hindenberg (which was larger than the Titanic and 3.5 times longer than a 747). 

The  Magenn Power proto-type, as filmed on the Discovery channel, conclusively prove these things simply don&#039;t work!

These guys propose hanging 100&#039;s of tons of power generating and transmission hardware on a lighter than air vehicle blowing around on the end of a 10km long ground attached tether and subjecting it to the 150 mph jetstream?? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $100K &#8216;investment&#8217; shows how low priority this research is. The entire idea is complete BS.</p>
<p>1) A tether 10km long that is able to conduct MW&#8217;s worth of energy would weigh 100s of tons! 2) A MW range generator weighs 10s of tons. 3) To lift just 200 ton requires a craft the size of the Hindenberg (which was larger than the Titanic and 3.5 times longer than a 747). </p>
<p>The  Magenn Power proto-type, as filmed on the Discovery channel, conclusively prove these things simply don&#8217;t work!</p>
<p>These guys propose hanging 100&#8217;s of tons of power generating and transmission hardware on a lighter than air vehicle blowing around on the end of a 10km long ground attached tether and subjecting it to the 150 mph jetstream?? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 06:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial wind energy is all about cost-of-energy.  And the biggest driver in COE is the turbine cost.  While there may be potentially 20 times the wind energy available at 30K ft, the small diameter rotor wind turbine operating at that altitude won&#039;t be able to capture as large a percentage of that energy as a land based turbine.  The airborne turbine will also cost about 10 times as much as a land based turbine per kW, it will be much more prone to damage and breakdown, it will require much more maintenance, and will have much more downtime.

The economics don&#039;t make sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commercial wind energy is all about cost-of-energy.  And the biggest driver in COE is the turbine cost.  While there may be potentially 20 times the wind energy available at 30K ft, the small diameter rotor wind turbine operating at that altitude won&#8217;t be able to capture as large a percentage of that energy as a land based turbine.  The airborne turbine will also cost about 10 times as much as a land based turbine per kW, it will be much more prone to damage and breakdown, it will require much more maintenance, and will have much more downtime.</p>
<p>The economics don&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice shot of the aerial spraying of beryllium and aluminum and God knows what else. Let&#039;s get this straight this blog is supposed to be &quot;Clean&quot; Technica.  Amateur Technica is more like it!
Chemtrails = toxic water supply and food supply not to mention we breathe this shit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shot of the aerial spraying of beryllium and aluminum and God knows what else. Let&#8217;s get this straight this blog is supposed to be &#8220;Clean&#8221; Technica.  Amateur Technica is more like it!<br />
Chemtrails = toxic water supply and food supply not to mention we breathe this shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg S.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting photo of persistent jet contrails.  Airplane contrails don&#039;t usually hang up there and turn into clouds unless you do it on purpose.  I wonder what they&#039;re spraying?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting photo of persistent jet contrails.  Airplane contrails don&#8217;t usually hang up there and turn into clouds unless you do it on purpose.  I wonder what they&#8217;re spraying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA Takes a Look at the Jet Stream to Get 50 Times More&#8230; &#8211; CleanTechnica &#124; Aerospace Jobs, Aerospace Training</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-69119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASA Takes a Look at the Jet Stream to Get 50 Times More&#8230; &#8211; CleanTechnica &#124; Aerospace Jobs, Aerospace Training]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-69119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] webmaster@technorati.com wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="mailto:webmaster@technorati.com">webmaster@technorati.com</a> wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun B.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-68883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaun B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-68883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if the researcher took into the account the fact that the air is about 1/3 as dense at 30,000 feet compared to sea level. The density of the air has a direct correlation to the energy density.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the researcher took into the account the fact that the air is about 1/3 as dense at 30,000 feet compared to sea level. The density of the air has a direct correlation to the energy density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA Takes a Look at the Jet Stream to Get 50 Times More Wind Power &#8211; CleanTechnica &#124; Aerospace Jobs, Aerospace Training</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/31/nasa-takes-a-look-at-the-jet-stream-to-get-50-times-more-wind-power/#comment-68873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASA Takes a Look at the Jet Stream to Get 50 Times More Wind Power &#8211; CleanTechnica &#124; Aerospace Jobs, Aerospace Training]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=20941#comment-68873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] webmaster@technorati.com wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="mailto:webmaster@technorati.com">webmaster@technorati.com</a> wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
