<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-171792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-171792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China will cap coal consumption at 2011 levels starting in 2015.  That means going forward from 2015 China coal plants will be allowed to burn 6% less coal than they did in 2012.


At this point China is basically replacing less efficient coal plants with modern, highly efficient ones.


As of a couple of years ago China had closed over 9,000 of its dirtiest plants.  Don&#039;t know what the number is now.


China recently announced that they plan to peak their CO2 output by 2025 rather than 2030 as they had originally set.  I expect they will dial it back to sooner, they&#039;ve met other clean energy goal early and set more aggressive ones.


China has announced that it wants to help lead the fight against climate change.  They can&#039;t do that an continue to burn a lot of coal.  I suspect they mapped out a better route for themselves before going public with their climate change position.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China will cap coal consumption at 2011 levels starting in 2015.  That means going forward from 2015 China coal plants will be allowed to burn 6% less coal than they did in 2012.</p>
<p>At this point China is basically replacing less efficient coal plants with modern, highly efficient ones.</p>
<p>As of a couple of years ago China had closed over 9,000 of its dirtiest plants.  Don&#8217;t know what the number is now.</p>
<p>China recently announced that they plan to peak their CO2 output by 2025 rather than 2030 as they had originally set.  I expect they will dial it back to sooner, they&#8217;ve met other clean energy goal early and set more aggressive ones.</p>
<p>China has announced that it wants to help lead the fight against climate change.  They can&#8217;t do that an continue to burn a lot of coal.  I suspect they mapped out a better route for themselves before going public with their climate change position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barru</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-171791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Barru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-171791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China is adding wind and solar capacity to the grid, but it is 
misleading to say China is &quot;replacing coal plants with wind power&quot;. China is still adding coal plants in large numbers - China had 363 new coal plants on the drawing boards at the end of 2012 according to a Guardian article (http://bit.ly/Uc2QOc). The number of new coal plants in China is increasing at a somewhat slower rate than it did during the previous twenty years or so. This due in part to government supported increases in wind and solar capacity and is certainly a good thing, but the fact remains that the vast majority of China&#039;s power comes from coal and that is going to remain the case for a long time to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is adding wind and solar capacity to the grid, but it is<br />
misleading to say China is &#8220;replacing coal plants with wind power&#8221;. China is still adding coal plants in large numbers &#8211; China had 363 new coal plants on the drawing boards at the end of 2012 according to a Guardian article (<a href="http://bit.ly/Uc2QOc" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Uc2QOc</a>). The number of new coal plants in China is increasing at a somewhat slower rate than it did during the previous twenty years or so. This due in part to government supported increases in wind and solar capacity and is certainly a good thing, but the fact remains that the vast majority of China&#8217;s power comes from coal and that is going to remain the case for a long time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1,000,000 MW by 2050 is China&#8217;s Long Range Wind Plan (What is Ours?)</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-110869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1,000,000 MW by 2050 is China&#8217;s Long Range Wind Plan (What is Ours?)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-110869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of December, 2010, China then had installed 25 GW of wind &#8211; and planned to raise its sights from 50 to 150 GW by [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of December, 2010, China then had installed 25 GW of wind &#8211; and planned to raise its sights from 50 to 150 GW by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-103399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-103399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A significant portion of that renewable increase is from Hydro. China has the advantage of having invaded a neighbour with lots of mountains and rivers and no problem displacing its citizens that live in the way of a new dam. Of course all of this is dwarfed by China&#039;s growth in coal-fired energy production.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A significant portion of that renewable increase is from Hydro. China has the advantage of having invaded a neighbour with lots of mountains and rivers and no problem displacing its citizens that live in the way of a new dam. Of course all of this is dwarfed by China&#8217;s growth in coal-fired energy production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleantech Investment Sees Huge Increase, Creams Record in 2010 &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-73894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleantech Investment Sees Huge Increase, Creams Record in 2010 &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-73894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] did much of the increase come from? China, of course. China increased its spending on low-carbon technologies 30% and invested $51.1 billion in total, more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] did much of the increase come from? China, of course. China increased its spending on low-carbon technologies 30% and invested $51.1 billion in total, more [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Energy Reader &#187; Green Reader Jan.11.2011</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-73717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green Energy Reader &#187; Green Reader Jan.11.2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-73717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] US Congress filibustered renewable energy in the US, while China releases ambitious energy plan for 500 Gigawatts of renewable energy by 2020. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] US Congress filibustered renewable energy in the US, while China releases ambitious energy plan for 500 Gigawatts of renewable energy by 2020. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Energy Reader &#187; Pakistan calls for solar and wind energy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-73702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green Energy Reader &#187; Pakistan calls for solar and wind energy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-73702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] US Congress filibustered renewable energy in the US, while China releases ambitious energy plan for 500 Gigawatts of renewable energy by 2020. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] US Congress filibustered renewable energy in the US, while China releases ambitious energy plan for 500 Gigawatts of renewable energy by 2020. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.H.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L.H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always found it interesting that in the US, the only institution that the public elects is the one institution the public wants to remove as much decision making powers as possible, and the institutions that the public has no say in how they are run are given the most power in make real decisions. What do you call the freedom to not have freedom?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found it interesting that in the US, the only institution that the public elects is the one institution the public wants to remove as much decision making powers as possible, and the institutions that the public has no say in how they are run are given the most power in make real decisions. What do you call the freedom to not have freedom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are factually wrong. China is replacing coal plants with wind power, by speeding up the percentage of wind on the grid, while dropping the percentage of coal on the grid.  Nuclear is more expensive than wind and even solar now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are factually wrong. China is replacing coal plants with wind power, by speeding up the percentage of wind on the grid, while dropping the percentage of coal on the grid.  Nuclear is more expensive than wind and even solar now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Renewable Energy Companies Advised to Increase Investments in the US &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinese Renewable Energy Companies Advised to Increase Investments in the US &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PolicyChina Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PolicyChina Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wooldridge</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wooldridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before one dives off into the greatness of wind power, one needs to realize the very severe limitations.  Wind power has a capacity factor--MWhours actually produced divided by (nameplate MW X 8760hours/year)--of between 20 and 30% depending on location.  The average operating time of a wind turbine is 60% of the time.  So the majority of the time, the output is far below nameplate when the turbines actually run.  When the turbines are running, the output swings considerably due to variations in wind speed.  All these factors mean there has to be some other electrical generating facility running to make up the difference.  Nuclear plants presently in existance do not ramp up and down very well so, pretty much, the backup has to be fossil power.  When fossil plants are running below design load, their efficiency decreases meaning they put out more carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour of energy.

So, if one wants to add wind power to increase the power capacity of a grid for new load, one also has to build a fossil plant or newer nuclear plant that can load follow more effectively.  And, that new backup plant cannot sit around idle waiting to be started up, it must be running with enough reserve capacity to pick up all the wind turbine output within a few seconds.

In short, wind power requires much more capital expenditure per megawatt-hour of new grid consumption than any fossil or nuclear facility because it requires something to back it up and a good bit of that something must be operating at relatively inefficient low load settings virtually all the time the wind turbines are producing power.

As for China touting their wind power additions--they can put up a wind turbine a lot less expensively than we can.  From what I have read, it is about half the cost of here.  Does anyone remember it was the arms race that brought down the USSR because their economy could not support the race like ours could?  It is my firm belief that is what China is attempting to do to us with renewable energy.  Don&#039;t forget, they are building new coal plants at a lot faster pace than they are adding wind or other renewable power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before one dives off into the greatness of wind power, one needs to realize the very severe limitations.  Wind power has a capacity factor&#8211;MWhours actually produced divided by (nameplate MW X 8760hours/year)&#8211;of between 20 and 30% depending on location.  The average operating time of a wind turbine is 60% of the time.  So the majority of the time, the output is far below nameplate when the turbines actually run.  When the turbines are running, the output swings considerably due to variations in wind speed.  All these factors mean there has to be some other electrical generating facility running to make up the difference.  Nuclear plants presently in existance do not ramp up and down very well so, pretty much, the backup has to be fossil power.  When fossil plants are running below design load, their efficiency decreases meaning they put out more carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour of energy.</p>
<p>So, if one wants to add wind power to increase the power capacity of a grid for new load, one also has to build a fossil plant or newer nuclear plant that can load follow more effectively.  And, that new backup plant cannot sit around idle waiting to be started up, it must be running with enough reserve capacity to pick up all the wind turbine output within a few seconds.</p>
<p>In short, wind power requires much more capital expenditure per megawatt-hour of new grid consumption than any fossil or nuclear facility because it requires something to back it up and a good bit of that something must be operating at relatively inefficient low load settings virtually all the time the wind turbines are producing power.</p>
<p>As for China touting their wind power additions&#8211;they can put up a wind turbine a lot less expensively than we can.  From what I have read, it is about half the cost of here.  Does anyone remember it was the arms race that brought down the USSR because their economy could not support the race like ours could?  It is my firm belief that is what China is attempting to do to us with renewable energy.  Don&#8217;t forget, they are building new coal plants at a lot faster pace than they are adding wind or other renewable power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Blowing the Roof Off with Clean Energy — Huge 2020 Plan Revealed &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China Blowing the Roof Off with Clean Energy — Huge 2020 Plan Revealed &#8211; Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] There are a few paragraphs from a great piece on some major clean energy news just out on Friday. Read the whole story on our sister site, Cleantechnica: China Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There are a few paragraphs from a great piece on some major clean energy news just out on Friday. Read the whole story on our sister site, Cleantechnica: China Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Is Cleaning Our Climate Action Clock Today &#171; Weatherdem&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China Is Cleaning Our Climate Action Clock Today &#171; Weatherdem&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] China recently released plans to get 500GW of renewable power tied into their grid by 2020 &#8211; just 9 short years away. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] China recently released plans to get 500GW of renewable power tied into their grid by 2020 &#8211; just 9 short years away. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree... historically, it made sense. Now we have a new king: the minority party Senate Republicans can go against the will of the majority of voters. They never need to capture more than 40 seats to run the country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; historically, it made sense. Now we have a new king: the minority party Senate Republicans can go against the will of the majority of voters. They never need to capture more than 40 seats to run the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim L</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our political system, in America, was purposely designed for gridlock, in order to stop the power, of a king. It was designed for the 18th century, and it worked well then. 

Now? Not so much. 

One problem I have with the way we govern is that we so obsess over the personal lives of our leaders, that quality people often don&#039;t want to run. They don&#039;t want to be subjected to the scrutiny. Not to mention the ADD we call Fox News and CNN.

Free speech is one thing. Knowing who Bristol Palin is sleeping with is another. 

No wonder George Bush Jr ended up running our country. The man has a 3rd rate mind, but then again, his daddy had money.

We will continue with our Gridlock of the Dummies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our political system, in America, was purposely designed for gridlock, in order to stop the power, of a king. It was designed for the 18th century, and it worked well then. </p>
<p>Now? Not so much. </p>
<p>One problem I have with the way we govern is that we so obsess over the personal lives of our leaders, that quality people often don&#8217;t want to run. They don&#8217;t want to be subjected to the scrutiny. Not to mention the ADD we call Fox News and CNN.</p>
<p>Free speech is one thing. Knowing who Bristol Palin is sleeping with is another. </p>
<p>No wonder George Bush Jr ended up running our country. The man has a 3rd rate mind, but then again, his daddy had money.</p>
<p>We will continue with our Gridlock of the Dummies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mexico Passes Carbon Plan for 25% below 1990 levels by 2020 &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-58144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Mexico Passes Carbon Plan for 25% below 1990 levels by 2020 &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-58144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PolicyChina Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PolicyChina Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12-07-2010 &#171; HOMER Energy Internal News Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-57996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[12-07-2010 &#171; HOMER Energy Internal News Aggregator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-57996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] China to add 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] China to add 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-57993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-57993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is China&#039;s next ten year plan supplied in this link from Eric Martinot who publishes various government plans
http://www.martinot.info/index.htm

this China policies for renewable energy
 http://www.martinot.info/china.htm#targets]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is China&#8217;s next ten year plan supplied in this link from Eric Martinot who publishes various government plans<br />
<a href="http://www.martinot.info/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.martinot.info/index.htm</a></p>
<p>this China policies for renewable energy<br />
 <a href="http://www.martinot.info/china.htm#targets" rel="nofollow">http://www.martinot.info/china.htm#targets</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @mark_E_evans</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-57657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@mark_E_evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-57657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you plan to link to the &#039;astounding&#039; Chinese Plan? Or mention its name?  Your numbers don&#039;t match the ones we see here in China.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you plan to link to the &#8216;astounding&#8217; Chinese Plan? Or mention its name?  Your numbers don&#8217;t match the ones we see here in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remember When the U.S. Took the Initiative? &#171; theeasygreenlife</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/12/04/china-adding-500-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-by-2020/#comment-57616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remember When the U.S. Took the Initiative? &#171; theeasygreenlife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=19398#comment-57616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] nation that has done so much to pollute and damage the environment over the last number of decades. China Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [excerpt...] On the same day that Senate Republicans filibustered a vote for renewable energy in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] nation that has done so much to pollute and damage the environment over the last number of decades. China Adding 500 Gigawatts of Renewable Power by 2020! [excerpt&#8230;] On the same day that Senate Republicans filibustered a vote for renewable energy in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
