<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silicon Solar Thin Film Manufactured for Under $0.70 Cents a Watt by Swiss Company Oerlikon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Obvious</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-100798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Obvious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-100798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since it was your idea, how about calculating the payback time and reporting back? Also, how far would you go on a day&#039;s charging? I think you would learn a lot. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it was your idea, how about calculating the payback time and reporting back? Also, how far would you go on a day&#8217;s charging? I think you would learn a lot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mata</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-49573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-49573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually the new Kai has a space for 10 more glasses than the actual Kai 1200... and with help with light trapping there is able to reduce the amount of Si on the a-Si and µc-Si cells... this reduction of thickness represents a reduction in production time...

to be able to lower the costs to $0.70 is made by the reduction of deposition time and not by saving matrial ;-)

nice article :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the new Kai has a space for 10 more glasses than the actual Kai 1200&#8230; and with help with light trapping there is able to reduce the amount of Si on the a-Si and µc-Si cells&#8230; this reduction of thickness represents a reduction in production time&#8230;</p>
<p>to be able to lower the costs to $0.70 is made by the reduction of deposition time and not by saving matrial <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>nice article <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":-D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-37474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-37474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey so has anyone considered putting this stuff on the windows for a car so that the windows automatically trickle charge the batteries?  I&#039;m just thinking that would be a really cool way to recharge your hybrid or regular cars battery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey so has anyone considered putting this stuff on the windows for a car so that the windows automatically trickle charge the batteries?  I&#8217;m just thinking that would be a really cool way to recharge your hybrid or regular cars battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-37122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-37122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NREL rated these. Plus, if anything, these kinds of engineering-heavy EU companies err on the side of being ridiculously modest! I once covered a world-leader EU engineering company that had been around for about a hundred years, that described itself on the website as &quot;solvent&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NREL rated these. Plus, if anything, these kinds of engineering-heavy EU companies err on the side of being ridiculously modest! I once covered a world-leader EU engineering company that had been around for about a hundred years, that described itself on the website as &#8220;solvent&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-37116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-37116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If their process is really capable of producing 12% efficient cells for 70c/watt than I would say it is a big comeback for amorphous solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If their process is really capable of producing 12% efficient cells for 70c/watt than I would say it is a big comeback for amorphous solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remodeling</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/17/silicon-solar-thin-film-manufactured-for-under-0-70-cents-a-watt-by-swiss-co/#comment-36829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remodeling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=16874#comment-36829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are still only scratching the surface. The wattage produced needs to be greatly increased to make it more desirable for homeowners. As a remodeling contractor, I am still finding it difficult to get many people on board with the idea of putting solar panels on their roofs. With a higher wattage return on their dollar, it would be easier to show the benefits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are still only scratching the surface. The wattage produced needs to be greatly increased to make it more desirable for homeowners. As a remodeling contractor, I am still finding it difficult to get many people on board with the idea of putting solar panels on their roofs. With a higher wattage return on their dollar, it would be easier to show the benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
