<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11 Gigawatts of California Renewable Energy Must Start in 2010 or Lose Recovery Act Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Andrew: No, it is correct. 11 Megawatts would be a relatively small power station. This 11 Gigawatts, or 11,000 Megawatts is the sum of a whole bunch of proposed solar power projects of all different sizes, some of which are 300 MW or up to 1,000 MW in themselves. It IS a gigantic amount, we have never seen anything like this. It would be a huge jump if they make it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew: No, it is correct. 11 Megawatts would be a relatively small power station. This 11 Gigawatts, or 11,000 Megawatts is the sum of a whole bunch of proposed solar power projects of all different sizes, some of which are 300 MW or up to 1,000 MW in themselves. It IS a gigantic amount, we have never seen anything like this. It would be a huge jump if they make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Litton</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Litton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is supposed to be 11 MW not 11 GW. The title has a huge mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is supposed to be 11 MW not 11 GW. The title has a huge mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that lots of Republican Senators support nuclear power, but very few have supported clean renewables in roll call votes.

Three months after the authoring of that bill with Cantwell, Ensign voted with Republicans who voted as a bloc against extending the expiring Investment Tax Credit for renewable energy.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00190

Finally at the end of 2008, Baucus wrapped it into the last-minute version of the must-pass Bush bank bailout bill, and that is how they finally got the extensions through.

http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/10/bailout-failure-brings-last-chance.cfm



 John Sununu, who did vote with Democrats was voted out by Republican voters.

Your other examples are Reps (in the House). The Senate is the problem, where the filibuster is paralyzing action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that lots of Republican Senators support nuclear power, but very few have supported clean renewables in roll call votes.</p>
<p>Three months after the authoring of that bill with Cantwell, Ensign voted with Republicans who voted as a bloc against extending the expiring Investment Tax Credit for renewable energy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&#038;session=2&#038;vote=00190" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&#038;session=2&#038;vote=00190</a></p>
<p>Finally at the end of 2008, Baucus wrapped it into the last-minute version of the must-pass Bush bank bailout bill, and that is how they finally got the extensions through.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/10/bailout-failure-brings-last-chance.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/10/bailout-failure-brings-last-chance.cfm</a></p>
<p> John Sununu, who did vote with Democrats was voted out by Republican voters.</p>
<p>Your other examples are Reps (in the House). The Senate is the problem, where the filibuster is paralyzing action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind is popular in Plains states, and ethanol is popular in the corn belt. And there are lots of Republicans who support nuclear power. The Production Tax Credit for wind has been extended several times, including years when Republicans held a majority of seats in the Senate so there must have been more than 3 voting in favor.



E.g.,

&quot;AWEA gives special thanks to Senators Harry Reid (D-NV), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Max Baucus (D-MT), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) for recognizing the PTC as an important national priority and ensuring its inclusion in the tax bill passed before Congress adjourned for the year. On the House side, the leadership of Rep. Bill Thomas (R-CA), Charles Rangel (D-NY) and Jim McCrery (R-LA) was critical in gaining an extension of the PTC.&quot;

http://www.awea.org/newsroom/releases/Congress_extends_PTC_121106.html



&quot;The language containing the extensions was authored by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and John Ensign (R-NV) and is called the Clean Energy Stimulus Act of 2008. The language, which was attached to the housing bill as an amendment, has bipartisan support to extend the commercial Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for solar and fuel cell projects for eight years and removes the utility exemption.

...

The bill also extends the residential solar credit for one year and removes the US $2,000 cap. The bill now has 30 co-sponsors, including members of the GOP who have opposed previous attempts to pass a tax credit extension such as Sen. John Sununu (R-NH).&quot;

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/04/senate-passes-housing-bill-with-ptc-itc-extensions-included-52144



And there are lots of Republicans who support nuclear power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind is popular in Plains states, and ethanol is popular in the corn belt. And there are lots of Republicans who support nuclear power. The Production Tax Credit for wind has been extended several times, including years when Republicans held a majority of seats in the Senate so there must have been more than 3 voting in favor.</p>
<p>E.g.,</p>
<p>&#8220;AWEA gives special thanks to Senators Harry Reid (D-NV), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Max Baucus (D-MT), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) for recognizing the PTC as an important national priority and ensuring its inclusion in the tax bill passed before Congress adjourned for the year. On the House side, the leadership of Rep. Bill Thomas (R-CA), Charles Rangel (D-NY) and Jim McCrery (R-LA) was critical in gaining an extension of the PTC.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.awea.org/newsroom/releases/Congress_extends_PTC_121106.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.awea.org/newsroom/releases/Congress_extends_PTC_121106.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The language containing the extensions was authored by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and John Ensign (R-NV) and is called the Clean Energy Stimulus Act of 2008. The language, which was attached to the housing bill as an amendment, has bipartisan support to extend the commercial Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for solar and fuel cell projects for eight years and removes the utility exemption.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The bill also extends the residential solar credit for one year and removes the US $2,000 cap. The bill now has 30 co-sponsors, including members of the GOP who have opposed previous attempts to pass a tax credit extension such as Sen. John Sununu (R-NH).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/04/senate-passes-housing-bill-with-ptc-itc-extensions-included-52144" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/04/senate-passes-housing-bill-with-ptc-itc-extensions-included-52144</a></p>
<p>And there are lots of Republicans who support nuclear power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Solar Engineering</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California Solar Engineering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great- we are excited to see so many MW produced from renewables for our grid and cant wait to see the long term benefits as a state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great- we are excited to see so many MW produced from renewables for our grid and cant wait to see the long term benefits as a state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish I had seen &quot;bipartisan support for renewable subsidies&quot;. There have not been more than 3 Republicans who have ever &lt;strong&gt;voted&lt;/strong&gt; to support renewable energy with subsidies, taxes on fossils, or any other method whatsoever of incenting a move away from fossil energy, all the way back to 1993, per the 50 roll call votes in the Senate for clean energy till  2008.

http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/9/mccains-50-votes-against-clean.cfm



Republican voters strangely tend to take out their Senators if they support clean energy: Chafee(NH), Smith (OR), Coleman(MN), Specter(PA) (after first trying to switch to a Democrat), were eliminated by voters. Graham is now under intense pressure. I think the only reason the Maine girls Collins and Snowe manage to hold on is that Maine is 55% renewable. It counteracts the fossil industry maybe...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I had seen &#8220;bipartisan support for renewable subsidies&#8221;. There have not been more than 3 Republicans who have ever <strong>voted</strong> to support renewable energy with subsidies, taxes on fossils, or any other method whatsoever of incenting a move away from fossil energy, all the way back to 1993, per the 50 roll call votes in the Senate for clean energy till  2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/9/mccains-50-votes-against-clean.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.matternetwork.com/2008/9/mccains-50-votes-against-clean.cfm</a></p>
<p>Republican voters strangely tend to take out their Senators if they support clean energy: Chafee(NH), Smith (OR), Coleman(MN), Specter(PA) (after first trying to switch to a Democrat), were eliminated by voters. Graham is now under intense pressure. I think the only reason the Maine girls Collins and Snowe manage to hold on is that Maine is 55% renewable. It counteracts the fossil industry maybe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;However, the Recovery Act 30% cash funding has till the end of this year only.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;



I&#039;m taking it pretty much for granted that the deadline will be extended. Or if it isn&#039;t, next year there&#039;ll be some sort of replacement. There&#039;s bipartisan support for various sorts of clean-energy subsidies, if not for putting a serious price on fossil-carbon emissions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;However, the Recovery Act 30% cash funding has till the end of this year only.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m taking it pretty much for granted that the deadline will be extended. Or if it isn&#8217;t, next year there&#8217;ll be some sort of replacement. There&#8217;s bipartisan support for various sorts of clean-energy subsidies, if not for putting a serious price on fossil-carbon emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladys</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/08/11-gigawatts-of-california-renewable-energy-must-start-in-2010-or-lose-recovery-act-funds/#comment-11066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gladys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=13833#comment-11066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand why does it takes so long-I thought anyone going green had an easy time with no stipulations-I hope they all make it in time because we need all we can get ASAP-Thanks for the great post]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why does it takes so long-I thought anyone going green had an easy time with no stipulations-I hope they all make it in time because we need all we can get ASAP-Thanks for the great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
