<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Easily Meets China&#039;s Fuel Efficiency Standards, Has Record Sales There</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: XinXin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-40305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[XinXin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-40305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If those Republicans come at me with the same fear-mongering and swift-boating that they usually do, then I will take them head on. Because I believe the American people are tired of fear and tired of distractions and tired of diversions. We can make this election not about fear, but about the future. And that won&#039;t just be a Democratic victory; that will be an American victory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those Republicans come at me with the same fear-mongering and swift-boating that they usually do, then I will take them head on. Because I believe the American people are tired of fear and tired of distractions and tired of diversions. We can make this election not about fear, but about the future. And that won&#8217;t just be a Democratic victory; that will be an American victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just goes on to prove that we are engaged in corporate welfare in this country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just goes on to prove that we are engaged in corporate welfare in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@DanDetroit, it doesn&#039;t matter what consumers &#039;want&#039;. If left to consumers, we would still have inefficient fridges gobbling up twice the kilowatt-hours . Fridges don&#039;t, because manufacturers had to &#039;meet more stringent standards&#039;.



 Same issue with oil consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DanDetroit, it doesn&#8217;t matter what consumers &#8216;want&#8217;. If left to consumers, we would still have inefficient fridges gobbling up twice the kilowatt-hours . Fridges don&#8217;t, because manufacturers had to &#8216;meet more stringent standards&#8217;.</p>
<p> Same issue with oil consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN9876</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAN9876]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real problem is, the people in the US think only foreign cars are good and that GM, Ford and Chrysler can not build good cars. Consumer Reports is constantly hammering the American companies and exaggerate at how great the Japanese cars are, and we are too stupid to see the are bias, so what do we do? We buy Japanese cars. I think it&#039;s time that we wake-up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem is, the people in the US think only foreign cars are good and that GM, Ford and Chrysler can not build good cars. Consumer Reports is constantly hammering the American companies and exaggerate at how great the Japanese cars are, and we are too stupid to see the are bias, so what do we do? We buy Japanese cars. I think it&#8217;s time that we wake-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanDetroit</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanDetroit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This author is misleading or at least naive in stating that fleet fuel efficiency equates to &quot;meeting stringent emissions requirements&quot;.



Fuel efficiency is a result of customer vehicle purchase choices. She appears unaware of the reality that Americans really don&#039;t care much about fuel efficiency. Oh, they say they do, but only after they get the capability, performance, and style they want. This is proven by the nearly 50% of the U.S. market captured by vehicles classified as trucks. In addition, these larger vehicles offer many times the unit profit of small cars. The U.S. makers are merely interested in regulations that allow them to satisfy their customers and to achieve the goal of any business, to make some money.  The Chinese, being very much less affluent than Americans, do choose fuel efficient, small to tiny cars. This sort of ignorance perpetuates the myth that the U.S. makers are inferior in capability to foreign makes. The simple fact is that Americans like large vehicles and will continue to buy them until fuel prices climb much higher than they are today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This author is misleading or at least naive in stating that fleet fuel efficiency equates to &#8220;meeting stringent emissions requirements&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fuel efficiency is a result of customer vehicle purchase choices. She appears unaware of the reality that Americans really don&#8217;t care much about fuel efficiency. Oh, they say they do, but only after they get the capability, performance, and style they want. This is proven by the nearly 50% of the U.S. market captured by vehicles classified as trucks. In addition, these larger vehicles offer many times the unit profit of small cars. The U.S. makers are merely interested in regulations that allow them to satisfy their customers and to achieve the goal of any business, to make some money.  The Chinese, being very much less affluent than Americans, do choose fuel efficient, small to tiny cars. This sort of ignorance perpetuates the myth that the U.S. makers are inferior in capability to foreign makes. The simple fact is that Americans like large vehicles and will continue to buy them until fuel prices climb much higher than they are today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Touche, Howard.

I am actually thrilled by the movement towards re-creating Detroit as an urban gardening post-oil-age pioneer, and shouldn&#039;t have let a succinct story line be the enemy of accurate depiction.



Now, back to &quot;shuffling around glassy-eyed in pursuit of my hopeless dreams&quot; :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche, Howard.</p>
<p>I am actually thrilled by the movement towards re-creating Detroit as an urban gardening post-oil-age pioneer, and shouldn&#8217;t have let a succinct story line be the enemy of accurate depiction.</p>
<p>Now, back to &#8220;shuffling around glassy-eyed in pursuit of my hopeless dreams&#8221; <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Eldhus</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Eldhus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote: &quot;It is sad that the US auto industry...ran an entire US city into the ground. Detroit is turning to back to pasture.&quot;



Ah, what dramatic hyperbole, Susan.  It would be even better if it were true.  It must be wonderful from your comfortable perch in northern California to be so intimately knowledgable of what going on in Detroit, 2,200 miles away.  Have you ever been to Detroit, or have you gotten all of your information about it by listening to late-night comedians?   Yes, Detroit is experimenting with some urban garden and farming.  Yes, Detroit is in a deep recession.  To use such a simplistic statement that &quot;Detroit is turning back to pasture&quot;, however, only illustrates your lack of in-depth knowledge and two-dimensional thinking.  Have you taken the time to learn about the things that actually are going on there?  Of course not - getting accurate information might ruin your pre-determined story line.



In the final analysis, Susan, I suppose you can&#039;t help yourself.  Northern California, after all, is nothing more than a collection of aging hippies and New Agers smoking dope, worshipping the moon, and shuffling around glassy-eyed pursuing hopeless daydreams, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;It is sad that the US auto industry&#8230;ran an entire US city into the ground. Detroit is turning to back to pasture.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, what dramatic hyperbole, Susan.  It would be even better if it were true.  It must be wonderful from your comfortable perch in northern California to be so intimately knowledgable of what going on in Detroit, 2,200 miles away.  Have you ever been to Detroit, or have you gotten all of your information about it by listening to late-night comedians?   Yes, Detroit is experimenting with some urban garden and farming.  Yes, Detroit is in a deep recession.  To use such a simplistic statement that &#8220;Detroit is turning back to pasture&#8221;, however, only illustrates your lack of in-depth knowledge and two-dimensional thinking.  Have you taken the time to learn about the things that actually are going on there?  Of course not &#8211; getting accurate information might ruin your pre-determined story line.</p>
<p>In the final analysis, Susan, I suppose you can&#8217;t help yourself.  Northern California, after all, is nothing more than a collection of aging hippies and New Agers smoking dope, worshipping the moon, and shuffling around glassy-eyed pursuing hopeless daydreams, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynx</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/07/04/gm-easily-meets-chinas-fuel-efficiency-standards-has-record-sales-there/#comment-9608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lynx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=12148#comment-9608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but why would they pay to modernize their factories here and produce competitive cars when it&#039;s so much easier to bribe politicians and take taxpayer bailouts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but why would they pay to modernize their factories here and produce competitive cars when it&#8217;s so much easier to bribe politicians and take taxpayer bailouts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
