<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Bill Can&#039;t Afford to Wait, Says Oil State Senator Begich (D-AK)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/02/energy-bill-cant-afford-to-wait-says-oil-state-senator-begich-d-ak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/02/energy-bill-cant-afford-to-wait-says-oil-state-senator-begich-d-ak/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/02/energy-bill-cant-afford-to-wait-says-oil-state-senator-begich-d-ak/#comment-9490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=10695#comment-9490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kathy; I am going on the Stavins summary, since he was instrumental in creating the cap and trade part of the climate bills. He says 82% goes to consumers (essentially offsetting any energy cost rise) which is more skewed to making consumers whole (cap-and-dividend concept) than the last climate bill (Boxer&#039;s CEJAPA) was. I think that shows that her idea has been &quot;morphed&quot; into it.



&lt;strong&gt;http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/analysis/stavins/?p=643&lt;/strong&gt;



At 82%, that amounts to &quot;cap-and-dividend&quot; to every American.



See Kerry&#039;s bill online here: &lt;strong&gt;http://kerry.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/APAbill3.pdf&lt;/strong&gt;



See &lt;strong&gt;Sec. 2101. Disposition of allowances for global warming pollution reduction

program.&lt;/strong&gt;



That said, just from listening to Cantwell in energy hearings, she is clearly the most innovative thinker in the Senate, totally committed to clean energy, and I expect we&#039;ll see more great ideas from her. But climate bills incorporate lots of amendments (sort of sub bills: RES standards, building codes, PTC, etc) (that&#039;s how they get to be 1,000 page affairs!). It is not a choice; hers is one of many contributions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kathy; I am going on the Stavins summary, since he was instrumental in creating the cap and trade part of the climate bills. He says 82% goes to consumers (essentially offsetting any energy cost rise) which is more skewed to making consumers whole (cap-and-dividend concept) than the last climate bill (Boxer&#8217;s CEJAPA) was. I think that shows that her idea has been &#8220;morphed&#8221; into it.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/analysis/stavins/?p=643" rel="nofollow">http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/analysis/stavins/?p=643</a></strong></p>
<p>At 82%, that amounts to &#8220;cap-and-dividend&#8221; to every American.</p>
<p>See Kerry&#8217;s bill online here: <strong><a href="http://kerry.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/APAbill3.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://kerry.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/APAbill3.pdf</a></strong></p>
<p>See <strong>Sec. 2101. Disposition of allowances for global warming pollution reduction</p>
<p>program.</strong></p>
<p>That said, just from listening to Cantwell in energy hearings, she is clearly the most innovative thinker in the Senate, totally committed to clean energy, and I expect we&#8217;ll see more great ideas from her. But climate bills incorporate lots of amendments (sort of sub bills: RES standards, building codes, PTC, etc) (that&#8217;s how they get to be 1,000 page affairs!). It is not a choice; hers is one of many contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/06/02/energy-bill-cant-afford-to-wait-says-oil-state-senator-begich-d-ak/#comment-9489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=10695#comment-9489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi - Just wanted to follow up on a comment you make - the CLEAR Act (the Cantwell-Collins cap and dividend bill) has NOT been morphed into the climate bill.  First, no one knows what the climate bill is.  Second, it doesn&#039;t seem like the latest Kerry-Lieberman draft includes a full auction, a ban on speculative trading or international offsets (key components of the Clear Act).  They are still big on giveaways to industry. Finally, the Kerry-Lieberman draft doesn&#039;t give direct returns to consumers but allows utility companies to &quot;pass through&quot; savings, a pretty vague system that I&#039;m not sure all of us trust.  Would love to share more about the bill let me know if you&#039;re interested you can contact us at www.supporclearact.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; Just wanted to follow up on a comment you make &#8211; the CLEAR Act (the Cantwell-Collins cap and dividend bill) has NOT been morphed into the climate bill.  First, no one knows what the climate bill is.  Second, it doesn&#8217;t seem like the latest Kerry-Lieberman draft includes a full auction, a ban on speculative trading or international offsets (key components of the Clear Act).  They are still big on giveaways to industry. Finally, the Kerry-Lieberman draft doesn&#8217;t give direct returns to consumers but allows utility companies to &#8220;pass through&#8221; savings, a pretty vague system that I&#8217;m not sure all of us trust.  Would love to share more about the bill let me know if you&#8217;re interested you can contact us at <a href="http://www.supporclearact.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.supporclearact.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
