<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6,000 U.S. Companies Support Climate Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/05/26/6000-u-s-companies-support-climate-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/05/26/6000-u-s-companies-support-climate-legislation/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Guyette</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/05/26/6000-u-s-companies-support-climate-legislation/#comment-9372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Guyette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=10266#comment-9372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s something counter-intuitive going on here.



Somehow, the public&#039;s opinion has started caring about sustainability of the products we buy and use, and it&#039;s not just based on cost.  And companies are responding to that, so there&#039;s something at work here other than pure economic pressure.



The pattern seems to be:  The public conscience drives demand, which drives corporate attitudes, which drives them to strategies that entrench themselves early as leaders in &quot;something good,&quot; which leads them to want legislation that gives them a competitive advantage because they&#039;re already leading in doing the right thing.



If we could bottle this and replicate it, we might actually have a formula for getting ourselves out of a lot of messes that can&#039;t be addressed with traditional supply-demand curves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something counter-intuitive going on here.</p>
<p>Somehow, the public&#8217;s opinion has started caring about sustainability of the products we buy and use, and it&#8217;s not just based on cost.  And companies are responding to that, so there&#8217;s something at work here other than pure economic pressure.</p>
<p>The pattern seems to be:  The public conscience drives demand, which drives corporate attitudes, which drives them to strategies that entrench themselves early as leaders in &#8220;something good,&#8221; which leads them to want legislation that gives them a competitive advantage because they&#8217;re already leading in doing the right thing.</p>
<p>If we could bottle this and replicate it, we might actually have a formula for getting ourselves out of a lot of messes that can&#8217;t be addressed with traditional supply-demand curves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gordon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/05/26/6000-u-s-companies-support-climate-legislation/#comment-9371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 07:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=10266#comment-9371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great news! I think i am seeing people being able to see what is really happening in the world. I just hope more companies do support the Climate legislation!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news! I think i am seeing people being able to see what is really happening in the world. I just hope more companies do support the Climate legislation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
