<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Brain Hurts &#8212; Solar Powered Oil Fields are Coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/23/my-brain-hurts-solar-powered-oil-fields-are-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/23/my-brain-hurts-solar-powered-oil-fields-are-coming/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/23/my-brain-hurts-solar-powered-oil-fields-are-coming/#comment-9094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=7578#comment-9094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first it seemed like so many panels (7,000) for so little power (740 KW), but I see in the link below that nearly all of the companies being tested are thin film (which I&#039;ve heard, takes more to make the same power) but I am surprised that it is so many modules.



For example I once did an estmate for about 100 KW on rooftops and it took 600 175 W panels.



So about 7 times that (740 KW) should only take about 7 X 600 = 4200 panels, ballpark. So thin film seems to use about twice as many panels...? Is that right?



http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first it seemed like so many panels (7,000) for so little power (740 KW), but I see in the link below that nearly all of the companies being tested are thin film (which I&#8217;ve heard, takes more to make the same power) but I am surprised that it is so many modules.</p>
<p>For example I once did an estmate for about 100 KW on rooftops and it took 600 175 W panels.</p>
<p>So about 7 times that (740 KW) should only take about 7 X 600 = 4200 panels, ballpark. So thin film seems to use about twice as many panels&#8230;? Is that right?</p>
<p><a href="http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/" rel="nofollow">http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/23/my-brain-hurts-solar-powered-oil-fields-are-coming/#comment-26409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=7578#comment-26409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first it seemed like so many panels (7,000) for so little power (740 KW), but I see in the link below that nearly all of the companies being tested are thin film (which I&#039;ve heard, takes more to make the same power) but I am surprised that it is so many modules.



For example I once did an estmate for about 100 KW on rooftops and it took 600 175 W panels.



So about 7 times that (740 KW) should only take about 7 X 600 = 4200 panels, ballpark. So thin film seems to use about twice as many panels...? Is that right?



http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first it seemed like so many panels (7,000) for so little power (740 KW), but I see in the link below that nearly all of the companies being tested are thin film (which I&#8217;ve heard, takes more to make the same power) but I am surprised that it is so many modules.</p>
<p>For example I once did an estmate for about 100 KW on rooftops and it took 600 175 W panels.</p>
<p>So about 7 times that (740 KW) should only take about 7 X 600 = 4200 panels, ballpark. So thin film seems to use about twice as many panels&#8230;? Is that right?</p>
<p><a href="http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/" rel="nofollow">http://earth2tech.com/2010/03/22/project-brightfield-chevron-launches-solar-test-bed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
