<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steven Chu: &quot;It Could Be Very, Very Bad&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: assistencia tecnica electrolux</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-26320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[assistencia tecnica electrolux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-26320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good article, i will add my feeds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article, i will add my feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assistencia tecnica electrolux</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-8786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[assistencia tecnica electrolux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-8786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good article, i will add my feeds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article, i will add my feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Hosting</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-8785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Website Hosting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-8785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Post.... Thanks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post&#8230;. Thanks <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Hosting</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-26319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Website Hosting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-26319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Post.... Thanks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post&#8230;. Thanks <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-8784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-8784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats have been trying to do that since 1993 when Al Gore tried to pass a BTU tax on fossil energy to fund renewable replacements. He has been singled out by the fossil industry for demonization ever since, but, we still try.

Cap and trade is designed to do that. It &lt;strong&gt;also &lt;/strong&gt;caps the &lt;strong&gt;allowable&lt;/strong&gt; carbon. The fees are used to lower consumers costs of electricity during the investment in new replacement clean power plants, and to help the power sector invest in clean power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats have been trying to do that since 1993 when Al Gore tried to pass a BTU tax on fossil energy to fund renewable replacements. He has been singled out by the fossil industry for demonization ever since, but, we still try.</p>
<p>Cap and trade is designed to do that. It <strong>also </strong>caps the <strong>allowable</strong> carbon. The fees are used to lower consumers costs of electricity during the investment in new replacement clean power plants, and to help the power sector invest in clean power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-26318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-26318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats have been trying to do that since 1993 when Al Gore tried to pass a BTU tax on fossil energy to fund renewable replacements. He has been singled out by the fossil industry for demonization ever since, but, we still try.

Cap and trade is designed to do that. It &lt;strong&gt;also &lt;/strong&gt;caps the &lt;strong&gt;allowable&lt;/strong&gt; carbon. The fees are used to lower consumers costs of electricity during the investment in new replacement clean power plants, and to help the power sector invest in clean power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats have been trying to do that since 1993 when Al Gore tried to pass a BTU tax on fossil energy to fund renewable replacements. He has been singled out by the fossil industry for demonization ever since, but, we still try.</p>
<p>Cap and trade is designed to do that. It <strong>also </strong>caps the <strong>allowable</strong> carbon. The fees are used to lower consumers costs of electricity during the investment in new replacement clean power plants, and to help the power sector invest in clean power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUCAS ROSARIO</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-8783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LUCAS ROSARIO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-8783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of asking for only subsidy, why not ask the government to tax the pollutor (fossil fuels) and use the additional tax to subsidize the renewable energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of asking for only subsidy, why not ask the government to tax the pollutor (fossil fuels) and use the additional tax to subsidize the renewable energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-8781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-8781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course we have to do something. It&#039;s cool that research monies have beed granted to develop car EV batteries 10 times more energy dense than li-ion!



However, why is the solar power tower being ditched! Brayton cycle gas turbines would reduce the land, (possible) water, and definatly, the grading requirements. The molten salt storage is at least TEN times cheaper. Speaking of grading, heliostats are post mounted, thus no enviro whining needed!



Therefore, if we &quot;are to do something&quot;, we need to get the costs of the CSP tower down to where it belongs. Why? Because it is the only source that can power humanity like 50 times over without any enviro problems (other than mining for raw materials, but hey, that would be offset by the lesser amounts of coal mining). It would be easy if governments stepped in to guarantee some kind of feed in tariff, only AFTER a cheap dollar per watt target was achieved. This way, us rate payers wouldn&#039;t be paying much more for clean electricity for cars and household. We need to exponentiate this perfect and unlimited form of electrical generation like wildfire `~&#039;



Wind is cheaper, but it&#039;s storage is ten times more. Sure, we need to make batteries that only cost $50 per kWh too... But we can&#039;t just rely on wind.



What really has to be &quot;done&quot; is abolish silly little enviro and nimby laws... Before GW becomes very real



Please ?&#039;-&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we have to do something. It&#8217;s cool that research monies have beed granted to develop car EV batteries 10 times more energy dense than li-ion!</p>
<p>However, why is the solar power tower being ditched! Brayton cycle gas turbines would reduce the land, (possible) water, and definatly, the grading requirements. The molten salt storage is at least TEN times cheaper. Speaking of grading, heliostats are post mounted, thus no enviro whining needed!</p>
<p>Therefore, if we &#8220;are to do something&#8221;, we need to get the costs of the CSP tower down to where it belongs. Why? Because it is the only source that can power humanity like 50 times over without any enviro problems (other than mining for raw materials, but hey, that would be offset by the lesser amounts of coal mining). It would be easy if governments stepped in to guarantee some kind of feed in tariff, only AFTER a cheap dollar per watt target was achieved. This way, us rate payers wouldn&#8217;t be paying much more for clean electricity for cars and household. We need to exponentiate this perfect and unlimited form of electrical generation like wildfire `~&#8217;</p>
<p>Wind is cheaper, but it&#8217;s storage is ten times more. Sure, we need to make batteries that only cost $50 per kWh too&#8230; But we can&#8217;t just rely on wind.</p>
<p>What really has to be &#8220;done&#8221; is abolish silly little enviro and nimby laws&#8230; Before GW becomes very real</p>
<p>Please ?&#8217;-&#8216;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/09/steven-chu-it-could-be-very-very-bad/#comment-26317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6791#comment-26317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course we have to do something. It&#039;s cool that research monies have beed granted to develop car EV batteries 10 times more energy dense than li-ion!



However, why is the solar power tower being ditched! Brayton cycle gas turbines would reduce the land, (possible) water, and definatly, the grading requirements. The molten salt storage is at least TEN times cheaper. Speaking of grading, heliostats are post mounted, thus no enviro whining needed!



Therefore, if we &quot;are to do something&quot;, we need to get the costs of the CSP tower down to where it belongs. Why? Because it is the only source that can power humanity like 50 times over without any enviro problems (other than mining for raw materials, but hey, that would be offset by the lesser amounts of coal mining). It would be easy if governments stepped in to guarantee some kind of feed in tariff, only AFTER a cheap dollar per watt target was achieved. This way, us rate payers wouldn&#039;t be paying much more for clean electricity for cars and household. We need to exponentiate this perfect and unlimited form of electrical generation like wildfire `~&#039;



Wind is cheaper, but it&#039;s storage is ten times more. Sure, we need to make batteries that only cost $50 per kWh too... But we can&#039;t just rely on wind.



What really has to be &quot;done&quot; is abolish silly little enviro and nimby laws... Before GW becomes very real



Please ?&#039;-&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we have to do something. It&#8217;s cool that research monies have beed granted to develop car EV batteries 10 times more energy dense than li-ion!</p>
<p>However, why is the solar power tower being ditched! Brayton cycle gas turbines would reduce the land, (possible) water, and definatly, the grading requirements. The molten salt storage is at least TEN times cheaper. Speaking of grading, heliostats are post mounted, thus no enviro whining needed!</p>
<p>Therefore, if we &#8220;are to do something&#8221;, we need to get the costs of the CSP tower down to where it belongs. Why? Because it is the only source that can power humanity like 50 times over without any enviro problems (other than mining for raw materials, but hey, that would be offset by the lesser amounts of coal mining). It would be easy if governments stepped in to guarantee some kind of feed in tariff, only AFTER a cheap dollar per watt target was achieved. This way, us rate payers wouldn&#8217;t be paying much more for clean electricity for cars and household. We need to exponentiate this perfect and unlimited form of electrical generation like wildfire `~&#8217;</p>
<p>Wind is cheaper, but it&#8217;s storage is ten times more. Sure, we need to make batteries that only cost $50 per kWh too&#8230; But we can&#8217;t just rely on wind.</p>
<p>What really has to be &#8220;done&#8221; is abolish silly little enviro and nimby laws&#8230; Before GW becomes very real</p>
<p>Please ?&#8217;-&#8216;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
