<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Mixing Solar + Gas Speed Utility-Scale Solar Deployment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.edward Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-35977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.edward Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-35977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been a solar advocate since learning about the sun god. I really became interested in the source in the Richard Nixon days of gas lines. In 1976 when solar panels where used to power the space station I built a model of a solar powered house for my Architectural projecvt for my senor high graduation. This is my point.

 I spoke over my solar house stating the great savings for a family/home, to have independent solar power supply w/power storage. Off grid power. 

Today&#039;s influencials are placing your savings and my idea at taking the savings and giving them to a seperate
indemnity.
                        M.edward Johnson(im not insane)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a solar advocate since learning about the sun god. I really became interested in the source in the Richard Nixon days of gas lines. In 1976 when solar panels where used to power the space station I built a model of a solar powered house for my Architectural projecvt for my senor high graduation. This is my point.</p>
<p> I spoke over my solar house stating the great savings for a family/home, to have independent solar power supply w/power storage. Off grid power. </p>
<p>Today&#8217;s influencials are placing your savings and my idea at taking the savings and giving them to a seperate<br />
indemnity.<br />
                        M.edward Johnson(im not insane)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$476 million / 155,000 MW·h x 0.13 [Capital Recovery Factor] = 0.40 $/kW·h



CRF is a shortcut to Levelized Cost of Energy; obviously the value depends on the interest rate and length of the loan.



Sanity check: FPL&#039;s new reactors at Turkey Point are estimated to cost about $18 billion (including financing and all the trimmings) and produce 2 GW on average.

If  $476 million / 18 MW = 26 $/W is cheap,

then $18 billion /  2 GW =  9 $/W is dirt cheap.



As for retail solar, is that after federal and state tax credits, and with net metering?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$476 million / 155,000 MW·h x 0.13 [Capital Recovery Factor] = 0.40 $/kW·h</p>
<p>CRF is a shortcut to Levelized Cost of Energy; obviously the value depends on the interest rate and length of the loan.</p>
<p>Sanity check: FPL&#8217;s new reactors at Turkey Point are estimated to cost about $18 billion (including financing and all the trimmings) and produce 2 GW on average.</p>
<p>If  $476 million / 18 MW = 26 $/W is cheap,</p>
<p>then $18 billion /  2 GW =  9 $/W is dirt cheap.</p>
<p>As for retail solar, is that after federal and state tax credits, and with net metering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$476 million / 155,000 MW·h x 0.13 [Capital Recovery Factor] = 0.40 $/kW·h



CRF is a shortcut to Levelized Cost of Energy; obviously the value depends on the interest rate and length of the loan.



Sanity check: FPL&#039;s new reactors at Turkey Point are estimated to cost about $18 billion (including financing and all the trimmings) and produce 2 GW on average.

If  $476 million / 18 MW = 26 $/W is cheap,

then $18 billion /  2 GW =  9 $/W is dirt cheap.



As for retail solar, is that after federal and state tax credits, and with net metering?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$476 million / 155,000 MW·h x 0.13 [Capital Recovery Factor] = 0.40 $/kW·h</p>
<p>CRF is a shortcut to Levelized Cost of Energy; obviously the value depends on the interest rate and length of the loan.</p>
<p>Sanity check: FPL&#8217;s new reactors at Turkey Point are estimated to cost about $18 billion (including financing and all the trimmings) and produce 2 GW on average.</p>
<p>If  $476 million / 18 MW = 26 $/W is cheap,</p>
<p>then $18 billion /  2 GW =  9 $/W is dirt cheap.</p>
<p>As for retail solar, is that after federal and state tax credits, and with net metering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bill, Your math may be wrong. Solar is down to about 15 cents a kwh at retail (on residential roofs) here in California - I doubt that 40 cents kwh for utility scale could be remotely correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill, Your math may be wrong. Solar is down to about 15 cents a kwh at retail (on residential roofs) here in California &#8211; I doubt that 40 cents kwh for utility scale could be remotely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bill, Your math may be wrong. Solar is down to about 15 cents a kwh at retail (on residential roofs) here in California - I doubt that 40 cents kwh for utility scale could be remotely correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill, Your math may be wrong. Solar is down to about 15 cents a kwh at retail (on residential roofs) here in California &#8211; I doubt that 40 cents kwh for utility scale could be remotely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The full-scale pilot test will show natural gas producers how solar could be added cheaply, reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.&quot;



What part of this is cheap? $476 million to produce an average of 18 MW means about 40¢/kW·h.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The full-scale pilot test will show natural gas producers how solar could be added cheaply, reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.&#8221;</p>
<p>What part of this is cheap? $476 million to produce an average of 18 MW means about 40¢/kW·h.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The full-scale pilot test will show natural gas producers how solar could be added cheaply, reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.&quot;



What part of this is cheap? $476 million to produce an average of 18 MW means about 40¢/kW·h.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The full-scale pilot test will show natural gas producers how solar could be added cheaply, reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.&#8221;</p>
<p>What part of this is cheap? $476 million to produce an average of 18 MW means about 40¢/kW·h.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landfill gas and solar - you are right - wow!



Great combo - the solar could be embedded right into those huge plastic sheets that cover the landfill to trap the methane for energy. Would need to be thinfilm, of course - flexible solar, like Konarka makes for the military. Even though thin-film needs more space... that s just what the landfill capture has!



Tom, you should patent this quick! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landfill gas and solar &#8211; you are right &#8211; wow!</p>
<p>Great combo &#8211; the solar could be embedded right into those huge plastic sheets that cover the landfill to trap the methane for energy. Would need to be thinfilm, of course &#8211; flexible solar, like Konarka makes for the military. Even though thin-film needs more space&#8230; that s just what the landfill capture has!</p>
<p>Tom, you should patent this quick! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landfill gas and solar - you are right - wow!



Great combo - the solar could be embedded right into those huge plastic sheets that cover the landfill to trap the methane for energy. Would need to be thinfilm, of course - flexible solar, like Konarka makes for the military. Even though thin-film needs more space... that s just what the landfill capture has!



Tom, you should patent this quick! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landfill gas and solar &#8211; you are right &#8211; wow!</p>
<p>Great combo &#8211; the solar could be embedded right into those huge plastic sheets that cover the landfill to trap the methane for energy. Would need to be thinfilm, of course &#8211; flexible solar, like Konarka makes for the military. Even though thin-film needs more space&#8230; that s just what the landfill capture has!</p>
<p>Tom, you should patent this quick! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lakosh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Lakosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gas &amp; Solar combined cycle should be developed where possible. Landfills should produce syngas via pyrolysis and develop solar tower fields on the then largely unused landfill site to generate combined cycle power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gas &amp; Solar combined cycle should be developed where possible. Landfills should produce syngas via pyrolysis and develop solar tower fields on the then largely unused landfill site to generate combined cycle power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lakosh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Lakosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gas &amp; Solar combined cycle should be developed where possible. Landfills should produce syngas via pyrolysis and develop solar tower fields on the then largely unused landfill site to generate combined cycle power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gas &amp; Solar combined cycle should be developed where possible. Landfills should produce syngas via pyrolysis and develop solar tower fields on the then largely unused landfill site to generate combined cycle power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, they got a lot of traction with their drumming up fears about solar&#039;s supposed water usage. The NYT, really all the media followed their story with endless more of the same, with no exposure that the Heartland Institue was behind it. Yet natural gas, (which is what we&#039;ll get more of without solar - uses more water and endangers clean water supplies with contaminants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they got a lot of traction with their drumming up fears about solar&#8217;s supposed water usage. The NYT, really all the media followed their story with endless more of the same, with no exposure that the Heartland Institue was behind it. Yet natural gas, (which is what we&#8217;ll get more of without solar &#8211; uses more water and endangers clean water supplies with contaminants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, they got a lot of traction with their drumming up fears about solar&#039;s supposed water usage. The NYT, really all the media followed their story with endless more of the same, with no exposure that the Heartland Institue was behind it. Yet natural gas, (which is what we&#039;ll get more of without solar - uses more water and endangers clean water supplies with contaminants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they got a lot of traction with their drumming up fears about solar&#8217;s supposed water usage. The NYT, really all the media followed their story with endless more of the same, with no exposure that the Heartland Institue was behind it. Yet natural gas, (which is what we&#8217;ll get more of without solar &#8211; uses more water and endangers clean water supplies with contaminants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I just bitched them out big time (the heartland Institute)! They complain about how solar is &quot;bad&quot; for the environment...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I just bitched them out big time (the heartland Institute)! They complain about how solar is &#8220;bad&#8221; for the environment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I just bitched them out big time (the heartland Institute)! They complain about how solar is &quot;bad&quot; for the environment...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I just bitched them out big time (the heartland Institute)! They complain about how solar is &#8220;bad&#8221; for the environment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a lot of the &quot;environmentalism&quot; roadblock is actually orchestrated by the very effective fossil industry via&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenlivingideas.com/topics/alternative-energy/solar-energy-photovoltaics/fossilfunded-group-spreading-lies-solar-water-desert&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt; The Heartland Institute&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, rather the way the Tea Party opposition to &quot;don&#039;t let gummint mess with my medicare&quot; opposition was orchestrated by that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Armey&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dick Armey DC lobbying firm DLAPiper&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that owns Freedomworks (Rachel Maddow last night)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of the &#8220;environmentalism&#8221; roadblock is actually orchestrated by the very effective fossil industry via<a href="http://greenlivingideas.com/topics/alternative-energy/solar-energy-photovoltaics/fossilfunded-group-spreading-lies-solar-water-desert" rel="nofollow"><strong> The Heartland Institute</strong></a>, rather the way the Tea Party opposition to &#8220;don&#8217;t let gummint mess with my medicare&#8221; opposition was orchestrated by that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Armey" rel="nofollow"><strong>Dick Armey DC lobbying firm DLAPiper</strong></a> that owns Freedomworks (Rachel Maddow last night)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a lot of the &quot;environmentalism&quot; roadblock is actually orchestrated by the very effective fossil industry via&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenlivingideas.com/topics/alternative-energy/solar-energy-photovoltaics/fossilfunded-group-spreading-lies-solar-water-desert&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt; The Heartland Institute&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, rather the way the Tea Party opposition to &quot;don&#039;t let gummint mess with my medicare&quot; opposition was orchestrated by that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Armey&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dick Armey DC lobbying firm DLAPiper&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that owns Freedomworks (Rachel Maddow last night)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of the &#8220;environmentalism&#8221; roadblock is actually orchestrated by the very effective fossil industry via<a href="http://greenlivingideas.com/topics/alternative-energy/solar-energy-photovoltaics/fossilfunded-group-spreading-lies-solar-water-desert" rel="nofollow"><strong> The Heartland Institute</strong></a>, rather the way the Tea Party opposition to &#8220;don&#8217;t let gummint mess with my medicare&#8221; opposition was orchestrated by that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Armey" rel="nofollow"><strong>Dick Armey DC lobbying firm DLAPiper</strong></a> that owns Freedomworks (Rachel Maddow last night)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s with silly enviro and nimbyism causing RE roadblocks? &quot;They&quot; say to reduce CO2, then they say &quot;Oh no, we can&#039;t have massive solar&quot;!



I say &quot;Let&#039;s ditch solar troughs for the better, solar power tower&quot;. No enviro/nimby problems because heliostats are post mounted (little or no grading. Molten salts storage is simply the best form of energy storage, especially since the tower concept heats it sufficiently to power a Brayton cycle (unlike troughs). Molten salt heat storage is like twenty times cheaper than batteries.



Now is the time to focus the sun (and our research) into the &quot;best&quot; solar. Heliostats should be robotically mass produced and they can power ten times global demand on about 10% of the deserts alone... (This is because all the heat wasted to FF generation does not have to be accounted for).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with silly enviro and nimbyism causing RE roadblocks? &#8220;They&#8221; say to reduce CO2, then they say &#8220;Oh no, we can&#8217;t have massive solar&#8221;!</p>
<p>I say &#8220;Let&#8217;s ditch solar troughs for the better, solar power tower&#8221;. No enviro/nimby problems because heliostats are post mounted (little or no grading. Molten salts storage is simply the best form of energy storage, especially since the tower concept heats it sufficiently to power a Brayton cycle (unlike troughs). Molten salt heat storage is like twenty times cheaper than batteries.</p>
<p>Now is the time to focus the sun (and our research) into the &#8220;best&#8221; solar. Heliostats should be robotically mass produced and they can power ten times global demand on about 10% of the deserts alone&#8230; (This is because all the heat wasted to FF generation does not have to be accounted for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-26304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-26304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s with silly enviro and nimbyism causing RE roadblocks? &quot;They&quot; say to reduce CO2, then they say &quot;Oh no, we can&#039;t have massive solar&quot;!



I say &quot;Let&#039;s ditch solar troughs for the better, solar power tower&quot;. No enviro/nimby problems because heliostats are post mounted (little or no grading. Molten salts storage is simply the best form of energy storage, especially since the tower concept heats it sufficiently to power a Brayton cycle (unlike troughs). Molten salt heat storage is like twenty times cheaper than batteries.



Now is the time to focus the sun (and our research) into the &quot;best&quot; solar. Heliostats should be robotically mass produced and they can power ten times global demand on about 10% of the deserts alone... (This is because all the heat wasted to FF generation does not have to be accounted for).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with silly enviro and nimbyism causing RE roadblocks? &#8220;They&#8221; say to reduce CO2, then they say &#8220;Oh no, we can&#8217;t have massive solar&#8221;!</p>
<p>I say &#8220;Let&#8217;s ditch solar troughs for the better, solar power tower&#8221;. No enviro/nimby problems because heliostats are post mounted (little or no grading. Molten salts storage is simply the best form of energy storage, especially since the tower concept heats it sufficiently to power a Brayton cycle (unlike troughs). Molten salt heat storage is like twenty times cheaper than batteries.</p>
<p>Now is the time to focus the sun (and our research) into the &#8220;best&#8221; solar. Heliostats should be robotically mass produced and they can power ten times global demand on about 10% of the deserts alone&#8230; (This is because all the heat wasted to FF generation does not have to be accounted for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg R</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/03/08/could-mixing-solar-gas-speed-utility-scale-solar-deployment/#comment-9095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=6718#comment-9095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like what there doing there. Everyone thinks  they&#039;ll change the world overnight, to me this is a very positive step forward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like what there doing there. Everyone thinks  they&#8217;ll change the world overnight, to me this is a very positive step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
