<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Zero Emissions Natural Gas Plant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/#comment-8615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=5212#comment-8615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news!



With so many industry forces pushing to put fuel cells into vehicles to generate electricity locally to power what effectively becomes a range extended EV, it always seemed a missing link that large utility scale fuel cells weren&#039;t being developed and tested. After all, the electrical transmission grid already exists as opposed to building a hydrogen distribution infrastructure from scratch. Plus, the idea of driving around with a 5000 psi hydrogen storage tank in a car seems .... extremely risky.



Only down side I can see to utility scale Fuel Cells is their energy efficiency isn&#039;t much better than a conventional turbine plant with 50% of the energy in the fuel still becoming a heat byproduct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news!</p>
<p>With so many industry forces pushing to put fuel cells into vehicles to generate electricity locally to power what effectively becomes a range extended EV, it always seemed a missing link that large utility scale fuel cells weren&#8217;t being developed and tested. After all, the electrical transmission grid already exists as opposed to building a hydrogen distribution infrastructure from scratch. Plus, the idea of driving around with a 5000 psi hydrogen storage tank in a car seems &#8230;. extremely risky.</p>
<p>Only down side I can see to utility scale Fuel Cells is their energy efficiency isn&#8217;t much better than a conventional turbine plant with 50% of the energy in the fuel still becoming a heat byproduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/#comment-26072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=5212#comment-26072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news!



With so many industry forces pushing to put fuel cells into vehicles to generate electricity locally to power what effectively becomes a range extended EV, it always seemed a missing link that large utility scale fuel cells weren&#039;t being developed and tested. After all, the electrical transmission grid already exists as opposed to building a hydrogen distribution infrastructure from scratch. Plus, the idea of driving around with a 5000 psi hydrogen storage tank in a car seems .... extremely risky.



Only down side I can see to utility scale Fuel Cells is their energy efficiency isn&#039;t much better than a conventional turbine plant with 50% of the energy in the fuel still becoming a heat byproduct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news!</p>
<p>With so many industry forces pushing to put fuel cells into vehicles to generate electricity locally to power what effectively becomes a range extended EV, it always seemed a missing link that large utility scale fuel cells weren&#8217;t being developed and tested. After all, the electrical transmission grid already exists as opposed to building a hydrogen distribution infrastructure from scratch. Plus, the idea of driving around with a 5000 psi hydrogen storage tank in a car seems &#8230;. extremely risky.</p>
<p>Only down side I can see to utility scale Fuel Cells is their energy efficiency isn&#8217;t much better than a conventional turbine plant with 50% of the energy in the fuel still becoming a heat byproduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry.buehler</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/#comment-8614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henry.buehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=5212#comment-8614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry.buehler</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/16/a-zero-emissions-natural-gas-plant/#comment-26071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henry.buehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=5212#comment-26071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.haynesvillemovie.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
