<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Global Wind Power Report (by Country): Wind Up (Despite Economy) and China &amp; US Up Big</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-66473</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-66473</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s the source, with more info http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&amp;tx_ttnews[tt_news]=247</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s the source, with more info <a href="http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&#038;tx_ttnewstt_news=247" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&#038;tx_ttnewstt_news=247</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Seno</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-65154</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Seno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-65154</guid>
		<description>Anyone knows where to find the whole report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone knows where to find the whole report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian N</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-8907</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-8907</guid>
		<description>Note that everyone of those GW installed capacity #s is the boiler plate value and assumes 100% of their generated electricity is used by the grid.



Without massive storage, the grids the world over actually consume just 30-35% of the turbines generated power which is when it matches loads.

This is called capacity factor and is never stated.

All power generators have a capacity factor # but renewables look low because of the lack of storage to regulate intermittentcy.



The U.S. wind energy association does however state that 62 million tons of CO2 is offset by their total wind production. Thats 7,077 tons per hr. Using the ave fig of 1.35 lbs of CO2/kWh you get 10.5GW ave power.

(ref  eia doe gov  CO2 Enmissions Report)

This also reconciles with published U.S. wind contribution of 2-2.5% to the 440GW ave supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that everyone of those GW installed capacity #s is the boiler plate value and assumes 100% of their generated electricity is used by the grid.</p>
<p>Without massive storage, the grids the world over actually consume just 30-35% of the turbines generated power which is when it matches loads.</p>
<p>This is called capacity factor and is never stated.</p>
<p>All power generators have a capacity factor # but renewables look low because of the lack of storage to regulate intermittentcy.</p>
<p>The U.S. wind energy association does however state that 62 million tons of CO2 is offset by their total wind production. Thats 7,077 tons per hr. Using the ave fig of 1.35 lbs of CO2/kWh you get 10.5GW ave power.</p>
<p>(ref  eia doe gov  CO2 Enmissions Report)</p>
<p>This also reconciles with published U.S. wind contribution of 2-2.5% to the 440GW ave supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian N</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-26023</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-26023</guid>
		<description>Note that everyone of those GW installed capacity #s is the boiler plate value and assumes 100% of their generated electricity is used by the grid.



Without massive storage, the grids the world over actually consume just 30-35% of the turbines generated power which is when it matches loads.

This is called capacity factor and is never stated.

All power generators have a capacity factor # but renewables look low because of the lack of storage to regulate intermittentcy.



The U.S. wind energy association does however state that 62 million tons of CO2 is offset by their total wind production. Thats 7,077 tons per hr. Using the ave fig of 1.35 lbs of CO2/kWh you get 10.5GW ave power.

(ref  eia doe gov  CO2 Enmissions Report)

This also reconciles with published U.S. wind contribution of 2-2.5% to the 440GW ave supply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that everyone of those GW installed capacity #s is the boiler plate value and assumes 100% of their generated electricity is used by the grid.</p>
<p>Without massive storage, the grids the world over actually consume just 30-35% of the turbines generated power which is when it matches loads.</p>
<p>This is called capacity factor and is never stated.</p>
<p>All power generators have a capacity factor # but renewables look low because of the lack of storage to regulate intermittentcy.</p>
<p>The U.S. wind energy association does however state that 62 million tons of CO2 is offset by their total wind production. Thats 7,077 tons per hr. Using the ave fig of 1.35 lbs of CO2/kWh you get 10.5GW ave power.</p>
<p>(ref  eia doe gov  CO2 Enmissions Report)</p>
<p>This also reconciles with published U.S. wind contribution of 2-2.5% to the 440GW ave supply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-8906</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-8906</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more, great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-26022</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-26022</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more, great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Lippmann</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-8902</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Lippmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-8902</guid>
		<description>3) China: 25.1 GW of installed capacity (up from 12.1 GW in 2008, 34.7% increase)



Left over agit-prop from the Rockefeller Trust.  Don&#039;t you guys read your own headlines.



Your goose is cooked.  If they double for another 7 years, China will be 100% windpowered.  But probably already this year, since the writing which has been on the wall for a decade, which Wall St. tried to stop with the crisis, which they failed to stop even after lying that they had until now, no question but the only thing wrong with this world is the corrupt Congressmen on Wall St.&#039;s payroll.  Jim Kramer should be committed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3) China: 25.1 GW of installed capacity (up from 12.1 GW in 2008, 34.7% increase)</p>
<p>Left over agit-prop from the Rockefeller Trust.  Don&#8217;t you guys read your own headlines.</p>
<p>Your goose is cooked.  If they double for another 7 years, China will be 100% windpowered.  But probably already this year, since the writing which has been on the wall for a decade, which Wall St. tried to stop with the crisis, which they failed to stop even after lying that they had until now, no question but the only thing wrong with this world is the corrupt Congressmen on Wall St.&#8217;s payroll.  Jim Kramer should be committed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Lippmann</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/02/05/2009-global-wind-power-report-by-country-wind-up-despite-economy-and-china-us-up-big/#comment-26021</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Lippmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4821#comment-26021</guid>
		<description>3) China: 25.1 GW of installed capacity (up from 12.1 GW in 2008, 34.7% increase)



Left over agit-prop from the Rockefeller Trust.  Don&#039;t you guys read your own headlines.



Your goose is cooked.  If they double for another 7 years, China will be 100% windpowered.  But probably already this year, since the writing which has been on the wall for a decade, which Wall St. tried to stop with the crisis, which they failed to stop even after lying that they had until now, no question but the only thing wrong with this world is the corrupt Congressmen on Wall St.&#039;s payroll.  Jim Kramer should be committed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3) China: 25.1 GW of installed capacity (up from 12.1 GW in 2008, 34.7% increase)</p>
<p>Left over agit-prop from the Rockefeller Trust.  Don&#8217;t you guys read your own headlines.</p>
<p>Your goose is cooked.  If they double for another 7 years, China will be 100% windpowered.  But probably already this year, since the writing which has been on the wall for a decade, which Wall St. tried to stop with the crisis, which they failed to stop even after lying that they had until now, no question but the only thing wrong with this world is the corrupt Congressmen on Wall St.&#8217;s payroll.  Jim Kramer should be committed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

