Comments on: Who’s More Powerful than Obama?

By: Hendrix-Page

Hendrix-Page — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:00:59 +0000

Informative article!

By: Neil Craig

Neil Craig — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:38:12 +0000

So the media is opposed to the warming scam & has thus never allowed any mention of it TV news or the papers. Presumably this is why they conspired together to prevent Gore getting an Oscar for his film on the mere excuse that it was provably a pack of lies?

By: Neil Craig

Neil Craig — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:38:00 +0000

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:07:19 +0000

Susan, right right, i should have been a little more clear about who that media is. i didn’t mean David & Joe (wish that was the case), but the whole system, dominated by the people you mentioned and all the other major media companies (on TV, radio, the web, and print).

By: Susan Kraemer

Susan Kraemer — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:50:00 +0000

Its the Porches, Zach. These millionaire sciencologists are all in it for those racy race cars and the sacks full of dollars that Mother Nature hands out.

No seriously; I agree that the media is much more powerful than any Democratic president will ever be, (charismatic or not) but I disagree about who is the media – a mere former secretary of energy under Clinton like Romm and a brilliant environmental blogger like Roberts have no power at all.

The paid media – Fox, Rush and Beck tell the Neils of this world what to think. And then they vote.

By: Susan Kraemer

Susan Kraemer — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:50:32 +0000

Its the Porches, Zach. These millionaire sciencologists are all in it for those racy race cars and the sacks full of dollars that Mother Nature hands out.

The paid media – Fox, Rush and Beck tell the Neils of this world what to think. And then they vote.

By: zach

zach — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:15:09 +0000

Neil, get realistic, leading climate scientists in NOAA, NASA, numerous universities, and other such respected organizations are not coming to these findings because they have money coming in from the oil… i mean, mother nature lobby

By: zach

zach — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:15:00 +0000

By: Neil Craig

Neil Craig — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:59:35 +0000

I* would like to know what evidence there is to claim a “scientific consensus” on catastrophic warming?

I have asked journalists, politicians & alarmist lobbyists now totalling in the thousands to name 2 prominent scientists, not funded by government or an alarmist lobby who have said that we are seeing a catastrophic degree of warming & none of them have yet been able to do so. I extend this same invitation here.

There is not & never was a genuine scientific consensus on this, though scientists seeking government funds have been understandably reluctant to speak. If there were anything approaching a consensus it would, with over 31,000 scientists having signed the Oregon petition saying it is bunk, it would be easy to find a similar number of independent scientists saying it was true, let alone 2. The whole thing depends on a very small number of people & a massive government publicity machine, both very well funded by the innocent taxpayer.

By: Neil Craig

Neil Craig — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:59:00 +0000

I* would like to know what evidence there is to claim a “scientific consensus” on catastrophic warming?