<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainable Energy and the Return of the Fly(wheel)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-8638</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-8638</guid>
		<description>This technology is indeed a very attractive energy storage problem worthy of our consideration, and now the whole world in the promotion of energy-saving, in my view, solar energy is a very good source of energy. Access:http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This technology is indeed a very attractive energy storage problem worthy of our consideration, and now the whole world in the promotion of energy-saving, in my view, solar energy is a very good source of energy. Access:<a href="http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-25911</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-25911</guid>
		<description>This technology is indeed a very attractive energy storage problem worthy of our consideration, and now the whole world in the promotion of energy-saving, in my view, solar energy is a very good source of energy. Access:http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This technology is indeed a very attractive energy storage problem worthy of our consideration, and now the whole world in the promotion of energy-saving, in my view, solar energy is a very good source of energy. Access:<a href="http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.china-solarwaterheaters.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-25910</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-25910</guid>
		<description>Love that Neolithic tech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love that Neolithic tech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-8637</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-8637</guid>
		<description>Love that Neolithic tech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love that Neolithic tech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Henry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-8636</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-8636</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing about this a long time ago



It fascinated me as a kid.I think it&#039;s wonderful that it is coming up again.



The same problems exists, but really for me it has incredible possibility for energy storage for a small town, village or community.



The problem is friction. Magnetically levitating the massive flywheel weight seemed to be a way.



The question always is, if you put energy in to it. How much energy is lost every week if you don&#039;t use it?



Is it 1% a week? Is it 2#?



How much energy can be held, how much is lost (% per week) and how much does it cost?



These are the questions.



We need examples and ranges. How does it compare to batteries, compressed air, heat storage and the other competing forms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing about this a long time ago</p>
<p>It fascinated me as a kid.I think it&#8217;s wonderful that it is coming up again.</p>
<p>The same problems exists, but really for me it has incredible possibility for energy storage for a small town, village or community.</p>
<p>The problem is friction. Magnetically levitating the massive flywheel weight seemed to be a way.</p>
<p>The question always is, if you put energy in to it. How much energy is lost every week if you don&#8217;t use it?</p>
<p>Is it 1% a week? Is it 2#?</p>
<p>How much energy can be held, how much is lost (% per week) and how much does it cost?</p>
<p>These are the questions.</p>
<p>We need examples and ranges. How does it compare to batteries, compressed air, heat storage and the other competing forms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Henry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/22/sustainable-energy-and-the-return-of-the-flywheel/#comment-25909</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4512#comment-25909</guid>
		<description>I remember hearing about this a long time ago



It fascinated me as a kid.I think it&#039;s wonderful that it is coming up again.



The same problems exists, but really for me it has incredible possibility for energy storage for a small town, village or community.



The problem is friction. Magnetically levitating the massive flywheel weight seemed to be a way.



The question always is, if you put energy in to it. How much energy is lost every week if you don&#039;t use it?



Is it 1% a week? Is it 2#?



How much energy can be held, how much is lost (% per week) and how much does it cost?



These are the questions.



We need examples and ranges. How does it compare to batteries, compressed air, heat storage and the other competing forms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember hearing about this a long time ago</p>
<p>It fascinated me as a kid.I think it&#8217;s wonderful that it is coming up again.</p>
<p>The same problems exists, but really for me it has incredible possibility for energy storage for a small town, village or community.</p>
<p>The problem is friction. Magnetically levitating the massive flywheel weight seemed to be a way.</p>
<p>The question always is, if you put energy in to it. How much energy is lost every week if you don&#8217;t use it?</p>
<p>Is it 1% a week? Is it 2#?</p>
<p>How much energy can be held, how much is lost (% per week) and how much does it cost?</p>
<p>These are the questions.</p>
<p>We need examples and ranges. How does it compare to batteries, compressed air, heat storage and the other competing forms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

