<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Might Still Have Food in the Future After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ruger</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-8631</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-8631</guid>
		<description>Hello

I just happen on this site in search of a place to just commune with others.

Maybe pass a few thoughts and ideas around .

But here I am again with an Ain&#039;t Soer like Neil Craig.



Frankly I am tired of it.

We always give all Neil Craigs a place to preach there dogma, but do theyxdo the sdame with us?



Look Neil consider a closed garage with a  vehicle motor running. Would you sit in your chair and enjoy the fumes all night?

Consider how much the oceans are dying from human&#039;s involvement.

Consider the most recent beautiful sunset you have seen? Much of that beauty springs from human by-products.

Now you say there isn&#039;t any scientist that proclaims global warming comes from human activity?

Well then where did so many people get this idea from? Look I read about problems with coal and atmosphres in a history book way back when I  was in school. There was and event over in England a hundred or so years ago . It seems many people died in a short time due to smoke being stuck in one place for several days.

Her In Pennsylvania out around Pittsburgh what 50 0r 60 years ago The same thiing happen.



My point ? If humans can create all  these other catastrophes with their elete ignorance of destroyiing their planet. Then Global Warming is just another stop  of humankinds way out of existence.

Yes Neil, we are talking about your children&#039;s children never to be born.

And Neil are you afraid of trying something new as far as cleaning up our planet.

New technology you afraid of cleaner inventions, new ideas ?

Neil if humans were like you way back when humans dwelled in caves.

Then you would stil be rubbing two sticks together to make fire. Oh that isi f humans hadn&#039;t cut the last tree down before that?



Neil when was the last time you really went out and studied nature. Heck even a single leaf on the closest tree to you?

Try it Please

Regards

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I just happen on this site in search of a place to just commune with others.</p>
<p>Maybe pass a few thoughts and ideas around .</p>
<p>But here I am again with an Ain&#8217;t Soer like Neil Craig.</p>
<p>Frankly I am tired of it.</p>
<p>We always give all Neil Craigs a place to preach there dogma, but do theyxdo the sdame with us?</p>
<p>Look Neil consider a closed garage with a  vehicle motor running. Would you sit in your chair and enjoy the fumes all night?</p>
<p>Consider how much the oceans are dying from human&#8217;s involvement.</p>
<p>Consider the most recent beautiful sunset you have seen? Much of that beauty springs from human by-products.</p>
<p>Now you say there isn&#8217;t any scientist that proclaims global warming comes from human activity?</p>
<p>Well then where did so many people get this idea from? Look I read about problems with coal and atmosphres in a history book way back when I  was in school. There was and event over in England a hundred or so years ago . It seems many people died in a short time due to smoke being stuck in one place for several days.</p>
<p>Her In Pennsylvania out around Pittsburgh what 50 0r 60 years ago The same thiing happen.</p>
<p>My point ? If humans can create all  these other catastrophes with their elete ignorance of destroyiing their planet. Then Global Warming is just another stop  of humankinds way out of existence.</p>
<p>Yes Neil, we are talking about your children&#8217;s children never to be born.</p>
<p>And Neil are you afraid of trying something new as far as cleaning up our planet.</p>
<p>New technology you afraid of cleaner inventions, new ideas ?</p>
<p>Neil if humans were like you way back when humans dwelled in caves.</p>
<p>Then you would stil be rubbing two sticks together to make fire. Oh that isi f humans hadn&#8217;t cut the last tree down before that?</p>
<p>Neil when was the last time you really went out and studied nature. Heck even a single leaf on the closest tree to you?</p>
<p>Try it Please</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ruger</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-25907</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-25907</guid>
		<description>Hello

I just happen on this site in search of a place to just commune with others.

Maybe pass a few thoughts and ideas around .

But here I am again with an Ain&#039;t Soer like Neil Craig.



Frankly I am tired of it.

We always give all Neil Craigs a place to preach there dogma, but do theyxdo the sdame with us?



Look Neil consider a closed garage with a  vehicle motor running. Would you sit in your chair and enjoy the fumes all night?

Consider how much the oceans are dying from human&#039;s involvement.

Consider the most recent beautiful sunset you have seen? Much of that beauty springs from human by-products.

Now you say there isn&#039;t any scientist that proclaims global warming comes from human activity?

Well then where did so many people get this idea from? Look I read about problems with coal and atmosphres in a history book way back when I  was in school. There was and event over in England a hundred or so years ago . It seems many people died in a short time due to smoke being stuck in one place for several days.

Her In Pennsylvania out around Pittsburgh what 50 0r 60 years ago The same thiing happen.



My point ? If humans can create all  these other catastrophes with their elete ignorance of destroyiing their planet. Then Global Warming is just another stop  of humankinds way out of existence.

Yes Neil, we are talking about your children&#039;s children never to be born.

And Neil are you afraid of trying something new as far as cleaning up our planet.

New technology you afraid of cleaner inventions, new ideas ?

Neil if humans were like you way back when humans dwelled in caves.

Then you would stil be rubbing two sticks together to make fire. Oh that isi f humans hadn&#039;t cut the last tree down before that?



Neil when was the last time you really went out and studied nature. Heck even a single leaf on the closest tree to you?

Try it Please

Regards

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I just happen on this site in search of a place to just commune with others.</p>
<p>Maybe pass a few thoughts and ideas around .</p>
<p>But here I am again with an Ain&#8217;t Soer like Neil Craig.</p>
<p>Frankly I am tired of it.</p>
<p>We always give all Neil Craigs a place to preach there dogma, but do theyxdo the sdame with us?</p>
<p>Look Neil consider a closed garage with a  vehicle motor running. Would you sit in your chair and enjoy the fumes all night?</p>
<p>Consider how much the oceans are dying from human&#8217;s involvement.</p>
<p>Consider the most recent beautiful sunset you have seen? Much of that beauty springs from human by-products.</p>
<p>Now you say there isn&#8217;t any scientist that proclaims global warming comes from human activity?</p>
<p>Well then where did so many people get this idea from? Look I read about problems with coal and atmosphres in a history book way back when I  was in school. There was and event over in England a hundred or so years ago . It seems many people died in a short time due to smoke being stuck in one place for several days.</p>
<p>Her In Pennsylvania out around Pittsburgh what 50 0r 60 years ago The same thiing happen.</p>
<p>My point ? If humans can create all  these other catastrophes with their elete ignorance of destroyiing their planet. Then Global Warming is just another stop  of humankinds way out of existence.</p>
<p>Yes Neil, we are talking about your children&#8217;s children never to be born.</p>
<p>And Neil are you afraid of trying something new as far as cleaning up our planet.</p>
<p>New technology you afraid of cleaner inventions, new ideas ?</p>
<p>Neil if humans were like you way back when humans dwelled in caves.</p>
<p>Then you would stil be rubbing two sticks together to make fire. Oh that isi f humans hadn&#8217;t cut the last tree down before that?</p>
<p>Neil when was the last time you really went out and studied nature. Heck even a single leaf on the closest tree to you?</p>
<p>Try it Please</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silkworm</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-8630</link>
		<dc:creator>silkworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-8630</guid>
		<description>Neil, normal people recognize the IPCC as the world&#039;s peak body on climate science, but not you. You see it as a political body. Only a conspiracy theorist or a politically motivated troll would say something as daft as this. When normal people read your rants, they just laugh at you.



There is no point making rational arguments with people like you. You deniers are narcissists who are immune to facts and logic. You only deserve to be mocked for the idiots you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, normal people recognize the IPCC as the world&#8217;s peak body on climate science, but not you. You see it as a political body. Only a conspiracy theorist or a politically motivated troll would say something as daft as this. When normal people read your rants, they just laugh at you.</p>
<p>There is no point making rational arguments with people like you. You deniers are narcissists who are immune to facts and logic. You only deserve to be mocked for the idiots you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silkworm</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-25906</link>
		<dc:creator>silkworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-25906</guid>
		<description>Neil, normal people recognize the IPCC as the world&#039;s peak body on climate science, but not you. You see it as a political body. Only a conspiracy theorist or a politically motivated troll would say something as daft as this. When normal people read your rants, they just laugh at you.



There is no point making rational arguments with people like you. You deniers are narcissists who are immune to facts and logic. You only deserve to be mocked for the idiots you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, normal people recognize the IPCC as the world&#8217;s peak body on climate science, but not you. You see it as a political body. Only a conspiracy theorist or a politically motivated troll would say something as daft as this. When normal people read your rants, they just laugh at you.</p>
<p>There is no point making rational arguments with people like you. You deniers are narcissists who are immune to facts and logic. You only deserve to be mocked for the idiots you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-8629</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-8629</guid>
		<description>The IPCC is not independent of government money. It is a political body appointed by the UN, funded by it &amp; having its conclusions rewritten by it. It is about as independent as the Pope is independent of Catholicism. Since that is the very closest anybody here can find to any independent scientits supporting the warming scam I take my point as proven.



Susan citing Hansen&#039;s GISS as independent evidence is equally ludicrous. Anybody with integrity would now withdraw the calim of scientific consensus. Whether she or Ed here does or not we can accept the result as representing the very highest standard of honesty to which they &amp; most of the &quot;environmentalist&quot; movement aspire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPCC is not independent of government money. It is a political body appointed by the UN, funded by it &amp; having its conclusions rewritten by it. It is about as independent as the Pope is independent of Catholicism. Since that is the very closest anybody here can find to any independent scientits supporting the warming scam I take my point as proven.</p>
<p>Susan citing Hansen&#8217;s GISS as independent evidence is equally ludicrous. Anybody with integrity would now withdraw the calim of scientific consensus. Whether she or Ed here does or not we can accept the result as representing the very highest standard of honesty to which they &amp; most of the &#8220;environmentalist&#8221; movement aspire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-25905</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-25905</guid>
		<description>The IPCC is not independent of government money. It is a political body appointed by the UN, funded by it &amp; having its conclusions rewritten by it. It is about as independent as the Pope is independent of Catholicism. Since that is the very closest anybody here can find to any independent scientits supporting the warming scam I take my point as proven.



Susan citing Hansen&#039;s GISS as independent evidence is equally ludicrous. Anybody with integrity would now withdraw the calim of scientific consensus. Whether she or Ed here does or not we can accept the result as representing the very highest standard of honesty to which they &amp; most of the &quot;environmentalist&quot; movement aspire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPCC is not independent of government money. It is a political body appointed by the UN, funded by it &amp; having its conclusions rewritten by it. It is about as independent as the Pope is independent of Catholicism. Since that is the very closest anybody here can find to any independent scientits supporting the warming scam I take my point as proven.</p>
<p>Susan citing Hansen&#8217;s GISS as independent evidence is equally ludicrous. Anybody with integrity would now withdraw the calim of scientific consensus. Whether she or Ed here does or not we can accept the result as representing the very highest standard of honesty to which they &amp; most of the &#8220;environmentalist&#8221; movement aspire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-8628</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-8628</guid>
		<description>No, Neil: NOAA says: &quot;The idea of a global or hemispheric &quot;Medieval Warm Period&quot; that was warmer than today, however, has turned out to be incorrect&quot;.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Neil: NOAA says: &#8220;The idea of a global or hemispheric &#8220;Medieval Warm Period&#8221; that was warmer than today, however, has turned out to be incorrect&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/" rel="nofollow">http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-25904</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-25904</guid>
		<description>No, Neil: NOAA says: &quot;The idea of a global or hemispheric &quot;Medieval Warm Period&quot; that was warmer than today, however, has turned out to be incorrect&quot;.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Neil: NOAA says: &#8220;The idea of a global or hemispheric &#8220;Medieval Warm Period&#8221; that was warmer than today, however, has turned out to be incorrect&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/" rel="nofollow">http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-8627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-8627</guid>
		<description>Neil stop trolling environmental blogs with your idiocy, if you&#039;re really such a genius e-mail a professor and post the conversation - surely his government funded lies will quail before your common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil stop trolling environmental blogs with your idiocy, if you&#8217;re really such a genius e-mail a professor and post the conversation &#8211; surely his government funded lies will quail before your common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/20/we-might-still-have-food-in-the-future-after-all/#comment-25903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4507#comment-25903</guid>
		<description>Neil stop trolling environmental blogs with your idiocy, if you&#039;re really such a genius e-mail a professor and post the conversation - surely his government funded lies will quail before your common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil stop trolling environmental blogs with your idiocy, if you&#8217;re really such a genius e-mail a professor and post the conversation &#8211; surely his government funded lies will quail before your common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

