<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan Gov to Repower Detroit With Solar Roofs for as Low as $6,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-8562</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-8562</guid>
		<description>While distributed generation costs have come and are attractive for distribution/blackout reasons - what are the final costs in $/watt with incentives?  Also, let&#039;s focus concurrently on generation of electricity and the conservation products already available.  If you go to www.Tintbuyer.com and get totally independent quotes for solar control window film, you will find that people can reduce consumption without any visual effect on their windows for much less than creating more generating capacity through PV, geotherm, or wind.  After all, if you reduce 500kWh or create 50W generating capacity - what is the net effect on the grid?



&lt;em&gt;[SK: Many states do require an efficiency audit first before installing solar, so buyers find out how much they could reduce demand first with any measures like you suggest before adding a new supply of solar electricity from the roof]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While distributed generation costs have come and are attractive for distribution/blackout reasons &#8211; what are the final costs in $/watt with incentives?  Also, let&#8217;s focus concurrently on generation of electricity and the conservation products already available.  If you go to <a href="http://www.Tintbuyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Tintbuyer.com</a> and get totally independent quotes for solar control window film, you will find that people can reduce consumption without any visual effect on their windows for much less than creating more generating capacity through PV, geotherm, or wind.  After all, if you reduce 500kWh or create 50W generating capacity &#8211; what is the net effect on the grid?</p>
<p><em>[SK: Many states do require an efficiency audit first before installing solar, so buyers find out how much they could reduce demand first with any measures like you suggest before adding a new supply of solar electricity from the roof]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-25859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-25859</guid>
		<description>While distributed generation costs have come and are attractive for distribution/blackout reasons - what are the final costs in $/watt with incentives?  Also, let&#039;s focus concurrently on generation of electricity and the conservation products already available.  If you go to www.Tintbuyer.com and get totally independent quotes for solar control window film, you will find that people can reduce consumption without any visual effect on their windows for much less than creating more generating capacity through PV, geotherm, or wind.  After all, if you reduce 500kWh or create 50W generating capacity - what is the net effect on the grid?



&lt;em&gt;[SK: Many states do require an efficiency audit first before installing solar, so buyers find out how much they could reduce demand first with any measures like you suggest before adding a new supply of solar electricity from the roof]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While distributed generation costs have come and are attractive for distribution/blackout reasons &#8211; what are the final costs in $/watt with incentives?  Also, let&#8217;s focus concurrently on generation of electricity and the conservation products already available.  If you go to <a href="http://www.Tintbuyer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Tintbuyer.com</a> and get totally independent quotes for solar control window film, you will find that people can reduce consumption without any visual effect on their windows for much less than creating more generating capacity through PV, geotherm, or wind.  After all, if you reduce 500kWh or create 50W generating capacity &#8211; what is the net effect on the grid?</p>
<p><em>[SK: Many states do require an efficiency audit first before installing solar, so buyers find out how much they could reduce demand first with any measures like you suggest before adding a new supply of solar electricity from the roof]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-8561</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-8561</guid>
		<description>What about those of us who can&#039;t afford the initial outlay of cash to install solar, but are still being strangled by DTE&#039;s high rates? The old Catch 22...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about those of us who can&#8217;t afford the initial outlay of cash to install solar, but are still being strangled by DTE&#8217;s high rates? The old Catch 22&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-25858</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-25858</guid>
		<description>What about those of us who can&#039;t afford the initial outlay of cash to install solar, but are still being strangled by DTE&#039;s high rates? The old Catch 22...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about those of us who can&#8217;t afford the initial outlay of cash to install solar, but are still being strangled by DTE&#8217;s high rates? The old Catch 22&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>Michigan will benefit from the climate legislation that is just kicking in now. It is bold and brave to try to switch the hardest hit state to renewable energy, and this Governor is doing the right thing.



The program costs some now but will yield $25 billion over the years, per the study I linked. People who no longer pay for utility electricity will have more money in their pockets, which will contribute to a recovery over the 25 years.



I know from when I did solar estimates that even in the first 25 years, savings from solar easily amount to $80,000 and up per homeowner, compared to what they would have paid to their power company in those 25 years.



So making it affordable initially, literally is like creating future wealth to be spent in that economy over the next 25 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan will benefit from the climate legislation that is just kicking in now. It is bold and brave to try to switch the hardest hit state to renewable energy, and this Governor is doing the right thing.</p>
<p>The program costs some now but will yield $25 billion over the years, per the study I linked. People who no longer pay for utility electricity will have more money in their pockets, which will contribute to a recovery over the 25 years.</p>
<p>I know from when I did solar estimates that even in the first 25 years, savings from solar easily amount to $80,000 and up per homeowner, compared to what they would have paid to their power company in those 25 years.</p>
<p>So making it affordable initially, literally is like creating future wealth to be spent in that economy over the next 25 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-25857</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-25857</guid>
		<description>Michigan will benefit from the climate legislation that is just kicking in now. It is bold and brave to try to switch the hardest hit state to renewable energy, and this Governor is doing the right thing.



The program costs some now but will yield $25 billion over the years, per the study I linked. People who no longer pay for utility electricity will have more money in their pockets, which will contribute to a recovery over the 25 years.



I know from when I did solar estimates that even in the first 25 years, savings from solar easily amount to $80,000 and up per homeowner, compared to what they would have paid to their power company in those 25 years.



So making it affordable initially, literally is like creating future wealth to be spent in that economy over the next 25 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan will benefit from the climate legislation that is just kicking in now. It is bold and brave to try to switch the hardest hit state to renewable energy, and this Governor is doing the right thing.</p>
<p>The program costs some now but will yield $25 billion over the years, per the study I linked. People who no longer pay for utility electricity will have more money in their pockets, which will contribute to a recovery over the 25 years.</p>
<p>I know from when I did solar estimates that even in the first 25 years, savings from solar easily amount to $80,000 and up per homeowner, compared to what they would have paid to their power company in those 25 years.</p>
<p>So making it affordable initially, literally is like creating future wealth to be spent in that economy over the next 25 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scott</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-8559</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-8559</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the &quot;Rogue States&quot; are the ones that aren&#039;t taxing and spending their way to bankruptcy.  Let&#039;s all follow the model of Detroit -- they&#039;ve really benefited from all the climate change legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the &#8220;Rogue States&#8221; are the ones that aren&#8217;t taxing and spending their way to bankruptcy.  Let&#8217;s all follow the model of Detroit &#8212; they&#8217;ve really benefited from all the climate change legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scott</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-25856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-25856</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the &quot;Rogue States&quot; are the ones that aren&#039;t taxing and spending their way to bankruptcy.  Let&#039;s all follow the model of Detroit -- they&#039;ve really benefited from all the climate change legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the &#8220;Rogue States&#8221; are the ones that aren&#8217;t taxing and spending their way to bankruptcy.  Let&#8217;s all follow the model of Detroit &#8212; they&#8217;ve really benefited from all the climate change legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-8558</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-8558</guid>
		<description>Michigan needs a mandatory feed-in-tariff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan needs a mandatory feed-in-tariff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/17/michigan-gov-to-repower-detroit-with-solar-roofs-for-6000/#comment-25855</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4480#comment-25855</guid>
		<description>Michigan needs a mandatory feed-in-tariff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan needs a mandatory feed-in-tariff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

