<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU to Push for International Climate Deal Through G20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/09/eu-to-push-for-international-climate-deal-through-g20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/09/eu-to-push-for-international-climate-deal-through-g20/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Rouhaud</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/09/eu-to-push-for-international-climate-deal-through-g20/#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estelle Rouhaud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4414#comment-8477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The international negotiations within the framework of the United Nations are indeed important but following how it went at Copenhagen, other options are indeed worth looking at. The G20 as a new structure for climate discussions is one option. Putting together willing countries that want to go faster than the UNFCCC negotiations as well as enhancing bilateral partnerships on climate and development issues (countries from North and South) are also other options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The international negotiations within the framework of the United Nations are indeed important but following how it went at Copenhagen, other options are indeed worth looking at. The G20 as a new structure for climate discussions is one option. Putting together willing countries that want to go faster than the UNFCCC negotiations as well as enhancing bilateral partnerships on climate and development issues (countries from North and South) are also other options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estelle Rouhaud</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/09/eu-to-push-for-international-climate-deal-through-g20/#comment-25786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estelle Rouhaud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4414#comment-25786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The international negotiations within the framework of the United Nations are indeed important but following how it went at Copenhagen, other options are indeed worth looking at. The G20 as a new structure for climate discussions is one option. Putting together willing countries that want to go faster than the UNFCCC negotiations as well as enhancing bilateral partnerships on climate and development issues (countries from North and South) are also other options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The international negotiations within the framework of the United Nations are indeed important but following how it went at Copenhagen, other options are indeed worth looking at. The G20 as a new structure for climate discussions is one option. Putting together willing countries that want to go faster than the UNFCCC negotiations as well as enhancing bilateral partnerships on climate and development issues (countries from North and South) are also other options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
