<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Carbon Tariff Will Tax CO2 at the Border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Bill W

&#039;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#039;

Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#039;t go wrong whichever way this goes... higher prices for oil and money for renewables!



&#039;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#039;

The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#039;s. That&#039;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#039;I told you&#039; kind of way :o)

Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill W</p>
<p>&#8216;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#8217;</p>
<p>Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#8217;t go wrong whichever way this goes&#8230; higher prices for oil and money for renewables!</p>
<p>&#8216;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#8217;</p>
<p>The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#8217;s. That&#8217;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#8216;I told you&#8217; kind of way :o)</p>
<p>Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Bill W

&#039;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#039;

Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#039;t go wrong whichever way this goes... higher prices for oil and money for renewables!



&#039;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#039;

The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#039;s. That&#039;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#039;I told you&#039; kind of way :o)

Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill W</p>
<p>&#8216;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#8217;</p>
<p>Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#8217;t go wrong whichever way this goes&#8230; higher prices for oil and money for renewables!</p>
<p>&#8216;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#8217;</p>
<p>The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#8217;s. That&#8217;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#8216;I told you&#8217; kind of way :o)</p>
<p>Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Bill W

&#039;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#039;

Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#039;t go wrong whichever way this goes... higher prices for oil and money for renewables!



&#039;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#039;

The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#039;s. That&#039;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#039;I told you&#039; kind of way :o)

Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bill W</p>
<p>&#8216;Gee, Andrew, if CRU were “cooking the books”, don’t you think you’d see some funding from wind and solar energy companies in there, too, since they stand to benefit even more?&#8217;</p>
<p>Big oil already has its fingers well and truly in renewables and of course the CRU itself was funded by big oil; if you take a look at their website it says so! They can&#8217;t go wrong whichever way this goes&#8230; higher prices for oil and money for renewables!</p>
<p>&#8216;And even if we assume that CRU’s data is bad, why does the anti-science crowd keep acting as though CRU is the only source of climate data in the world?&#8217;</p>
<p>The CRU collects and supplies the data to every other research organisation including NASA so, obviously, if their data is corrupt then so is everyone else&#8217;s. That&#8217;s why Climategate is such a biggie but it has been underplayed by both governments and the media alike. Governments have too much to gain from this going through and have also spent far too much of our money over the past 15 years to admit they are wrong without a fight and the media likes a good scare story..it sells! Over here in the UK the important newspapers are catching on fast though and loads is coming out.. very satisfying in a &#8216;I told you&#8217; kind of way :o)</p>
<p>Oh and did you know that the chairman of the IPCC has his fingers in oil.. new conflicts of interest are coming out every day in the UK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknuts17</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cknuts17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  http://bit.ly/6CaxUA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  <a href="http://bit.ly/6CaxUA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6CaxUA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknuts17</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cknuts17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  http://bit.ly/6CaxUA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  <a href="http://bit.ly/6CaxUA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6CaxUA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknuts17</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cknuts17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  http://bit.ly/6CaxUA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  <a href="http://bit.ly/6CaxUA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6CaxUA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cknuts17</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cknuts17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  http://bit.ly/6CaxUA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some tips on how you can save money by going green.  <a href="http://bit.ly/6CaxUA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6CaxUA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thenviron</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thenviron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons that ND does not have even more wind energy production (given the vast resource)is the lack of transmission line capacity out of the state. One of the reasons for lack of transmission lines is the resistance to new transmission line capacity by some of the same MN folks who promote the carbon tax.  Having worked in the environmental and renewable energy industry since the mid-70&#039;s, I can assure everyone that &#039;radical environmentalism&#039; is one of the greatest obstacles to the development of a sound domestic energy policy based on domestic energy sources of all types.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons that ND does not have even more wind energy production (given the vast resource)is the lack of transmission line capacity out of the state. One of the reasons for lack of transmission lines is the resistance to new transmission line capacity by some of the same MN folks who promote the carbon tax.  Having worked in the environmental and renewable energy industry since the mid-70&#8217;s, I can assure everyone that &#8216;radical environmentalism&#8217; is one of the greatest obstacles to the development of a sound domestic energy policy based on domestic energy sources of all types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thenviron</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thenviron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons that ND does not have even more wind energy production (given the vast resource)is the lack of transmission line capacity out of the state. One of the reasons for lack of transmission lines is the resistance to new transmission line capacity by some of the same MN folks who promote the carbon tax.  Having worked in the environmental and renewable energy industry since the mid-70&#039;s, I can assure everyone that &#039;radical environmentalism&#039; is one of the greatest obstacles to the development of a sound domestic energy policy based on domestic energy sources of all types.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons that ND does not have even more wind energy production (given the vast resource)is the lack of transmission line capacity out of the state. One of the reasons for lack of transmission lines is the resistance to new transmission line capacity by some of the same MN folks who promote the carbon tax.  Having worked in the environmental and renewable energy industry since the mid-70&#8217;s, I can assure everyone that &#8216;radical environmentalism&#8217; is one of the greatest obstacles to the development of a sound domestic energy policy based on domestic energy sources of all types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.



North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.



Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#039;s always blowing somewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.</p>
<p>North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.</p>
<p>Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#8217;s always blowing somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.



North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.



Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#039;s always blowing somewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.</p>
<p>North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.</p>
<p>Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#8217;s always blowing somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt and Ed, so true: especially when you consider that North Dakota is the &quot;Saudi Arabia of Wind&quot; - and just put two wind projects added onto the grid this week:



&lt;strong&gt;http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rural-electric-cooperative-complete-2010-01&lt;/strong&gt;



&lt;strong&gt;http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/31/foreign-windpower-giant-iberdrola-taps-saudi-arabia-of-wind-because-we-cant/&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt and Ed, so true: especially when you consider that North Dakota is the &#8220;Saudi Arabia of Wind&#8221; &#8211; and just put two wind projects added onto the grid this week:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rural-electric-cooperative-complete-2010-01" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rural-electric-cooperative-complete-2010-01</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/31/foreign-windpower-giant-iberdrola-taps-saudi-arabia-of-wind-because-we-cant/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/31/foreign-windpower-giant-iberdrola-taps-saudi-arabia-of-wind-because-we-cant/</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.



North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.



Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#039;s always blowing somewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWEA pegs the North Dakota at 1,210 billion kilowatt hours per year.</p>
<p>North Dakota alone has enough wind potential to meet more than fourth of U.S. electricity demand.</p>
<p>Sure, any one farm can be slow at times, but when wind turbines are strung out along a larger region it evens out intermittency. It&#8217;s always blowing somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew30</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”



The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.



For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.

Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.



Those windmills can’t do base load.



In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”</p>
<p>The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.</p>
<p>For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.</p>
<p>Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.</p>
<p>Those windmills can’t do base load.</p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew30</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”



The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.



For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.

Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.



Those windmills can’t do base load.



In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”</p>
<p>The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.</p>
<p>For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.</p>
<p>Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.</p>
<p>Those windmills can’t do base load.</p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew30</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”



The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.



For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.

Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.



Those windmills can’t do base load.



In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”</p>
<p>The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.</p>
<p>For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.</p>
<p>Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.</p>
<p>Those windmills can’t do base load.</p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew30</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”



The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.



For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.

Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.



Those windmills can’t do base load.



In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”</p>
<p>The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.</p>
<p>For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.</p>
<p>Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.</p>
<p>Those windmills can’t do base load.</p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew30</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”



The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.



For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.

Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.



Those windmills can’t do base load.



In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: “North Dakota is the “Saudi Arabia of Wind”</p>
<p>The 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota can generate 115.5 MW of electricity with a wind speed of 10 to 25 meters/second. They have a cut-in wind speed of 3.5 meters per second.  later tonight, tomorrow and Tuesday it will be cold, cloudy and calm; the wind speed will be about 2.3 meters/sec.</p>
<p>For the next 72 hours at least the 77 General Electric 1.5 kW turbines near Minot, North Dakota will be generating Zero MW of electricity.</p>
<p>Average wind speed does not mean constant wind speed.</p>
<p>Those windmills can’t do base load.</p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia the oil flows all day and all night every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-8222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-8222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet!  This is the kind of stuff we need to do, actually take into account the TRUE cost of coal and suddenly its real value comes into question.  Say no to coal, and cancer, autism, bad health, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet!  This is the kind of stuff we need to do, actually take into account the TRUE cost of coal and suddenly its real value comes into question.  Say no to coal, and cancer, autism, bad health, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/01/first-carbon-tariff-will-tax-co2-at-the-border/#comment-25625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4339#comment-25625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet!  This is the kind of stuff we need to do, actually take into account the TRUE cost of coal and suddenly its real value comes into question.  Say no to coal, and cancer, autism, bad health, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet!  This is the kind of stuff we need to do, actually take into account the TRUE cost of coal and suddenly its real value comes into question.  Say no to coal, and cancer, autism, bad health, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
