<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PG&amp;E to Try Next Round of Wave Power Tests off Santa Barbara Coast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-8291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-8291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piccinini -



You can&#039;t get 200Kw of power from wave that carry on 20Kw of energy. Your estimates violate conservation of energy laws! You are wrong by at least a factor of 10 and that is assuming 100% conversion efficiency. Maybe that is one reason no one is paying attention to your ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piccinini &#8211;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t get 200Kw of power from wave that carry on 20Kw of energy. Your estimates violate conservation of energy laws! You are wrong by at least a factor of 10 and that is assuming 100% conversion efficiency. Maybe that is one reason no one is paying attention to your ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-25386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-25386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piccinini -



You can&#039;t get 200Kw of power from wave that carry on 20Kw of energy. Your estimates violate conservation of energy laws! You are wrong by at least a factor of 10 and that is assuming 100% conversion efficiency. Maybe that is one reason no one is paying attention to your ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piccinini &#8211;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t get 200Kw of power from wave that carry on 20Kw of energy. Your estimates violate conservation of energy laws! You are wrong by at least a factor of 10 and that is assuming 100% conversion efficiency. Maybe that is one reason no one is paying attention to your ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piccinini Raoul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-8290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piccinini Raoul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-8290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your discussion, is very interesting, but data on the possibility of producing electricity from wave power plant, they certainly should be updated in relation to new technologies.

Currently the most productive is the &quot;Triton&quot;, designed in Italy for wave motion of 19.69 inches, (about 50 cm), with no limit in height of the waves. The most obvious peculiarity is the large amount of energy produced, there isn’t currently a system that produces more energy. I do not know how to behave in the U.S., but in Italy it is very difficult to present new technologies, where the individual elements producing 200 kW, from the waves of one meter. These are the minimum production data: for 1 kmq, of the sea surface or ocean, at least 1 GW or more, (instant, 24 GW for Day, GW 8.760 - year), production equal to 1 GW,  of 1 nuclear reactor, operating at 100% throughout the year, which produces 8.7 TW, but without the drawbacks of nuclear power. If you consider this a interesting system, you can contact me for more information, or to see the systems at sea in 2010.

Best regards, G. Piccinini Raoul.

E-MAIL: luoar@libero.it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your discussion, is very interesting, but data on the possibility of producing electricity from wave power plant, they certainly should be updated in relation to new technologies.</p>
<p>Currently the most productive is the &#8220;Triton&#8221;, designed in Italy for wave motion of 19.69 inches, (about 50 cm), with no limit in height of the waves. The most obvious peculiarity is the large amount of energy produced, there isn’t currently a system that produces more energy. I do not know how to behave in the U.S., but in Italy it is very difficult to present new technologies, where the individual elements producing 200 kW, from the waves of one meter. These are the minimum production data: for 1 kmq, of the sea surface or ocean, at least 1 GW or more, (instant, 24 GW for Day, GW 8.760 &#8211; year), production equal to 1 GW,  of 1 nuclear reactor, operating at 100% throughout the year, which produces 8.7 TW, but without the drawbacks of nuclear power. If you consider this a interesting system, you can contact me for more information, or to see the systems at sea in 2010.</p>
<p>Best regards, G. Piccinini Raoul.</p>
<p>E-MAIL: <a href="mailto:luoar@libero.it">luoar@libero.it</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piccinini Raoul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-25385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piccinini Raoul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-25385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your discussion, is very interesting, but data on the possibility of producing electricity from wave power plant, they certainly should be updated in relation to new technologies.

Currently the most productive is the &quot;Triton&quot;, designed in Italy for wave motion of 19.69 inches, (about 50 cm), with no limit in height of the waves. The most obvious peculiarity is the large amount of energy produced, there isn’t currently a system that produces more energy. I do not know how to behave in the U.S., but in Italy it is very difficult to present new technologies, where the individual elements producing 200 kW, from the waves of one meter. These are the minimum production data: for 1 kmq, of the sea surface or ocean, at least 1 GW or more, (instant, 24 GW for Day, GW 8.760 - year), production equal to 1 GW,  of 1 nuclear reactor, operating at 100% throughout the year, which produces 8.7 TW, but without the drawbacks of nuclear power. If you consider this a interesting system, you can contact me for more information, or to see the systems at sea in 2010.

Best regards, G. Piccinini Raoul.

E-MAIL: luoar@libero.it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your discussion, is very interesting, but data on the possibility of producing electricity from wave power plant, they certainly should be updated in relation to new technologies.</p>
<p>Currently the most productive is the &#8220;Triton&#8221;, designed in Italy for wave motion of 19.69 inches, (about 50 cm), with no limit in height of the waves. The most obvious peculiarity is the large amount of energy produced, there isn’t currently a system that produces more energy. I do not know how to behave in the U.S., but in Italy it is very difficult to present new technologies, where the individual elements producing 200 kW, from the waves of one meter. These are the minimum production data: for 1 kmq, of the sea surface or ocean, at least 1 GW or more, (instant, 24 GW for Day, GW 8.760 &#8211; year), production equal to 1 GW,  of 1 nuclear reactor, operating at 100% throughout the year, which produces 8.7 TW, but without the drawbacks of nuclear power. If you consider this a interesting system, you can contact me for more information, or to see the systems at sea in 2010.</p>
<p>Best regards, G. Piccinini Raoul.</p>
<p>E-MAIL: <a href="mailto:luoar@libero.it">luoar@libero.it</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-8289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-8289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll be more impressed when you learn how to develop technology that can actually survive the environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be more impressed when you learn how to develop technology that can actually survive the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-25384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-25384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll be more impressed when you learn how to develop technology that can actually survive the environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be more impressed when you learn how to develop technology that can actually survive the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-8288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are hoping that our radically new &#039;GyroWaveGen(TM)&#039; technology will prove to be a solution to the numerous problems encountered, to date, by other approaches that try to harness the enormous power of ocean waves. Stay tuned to learn more about this promising new technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are hoping that our radically new &#8216;GyroWaveGen(TM)&#8217; technology will prove to be a solution to the numerous problems encountered, to date, by other approaches that try to harness the enormous power of ocean waves. Stay tuned to learn more about this promising new technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/12/pge-to-try-next-round-of-wave-power-tests-off-santa-barbara-coast/#comment-25383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4189#comment-25383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are hoping that our radically new &#039;GyroWaveGen(TM)&#039; technology will prove to be a solution to the numerous problems encountered, to date, by other approaches that try to harness the enormous power of ocean waves. Stay tuned to learn more about this promising new technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are hoping that our radically new &#8216;GyroWaveGen(TM)&#8217; technology will prove to be a solution to the numerous problems encountered, to date, by other approaches that try to harness the enormous power of ocean waves. Stay tuned to learn more about this promising new technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
