<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rooftop Solar = 4% of Sonoma County&#039;s Power!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-8069</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-8069</guid>
		<description>Saw this this morning &quot;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&quot; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &quot;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&quot;



That&#039;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#039;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#039;re outta luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this this morning &#8220;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&#8221; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &#8220;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#8217;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#8217;re outta luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25267</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25267</guid>
		<description>Saw this this morning &quot;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&quot; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &quot;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&quot;



That&#039;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#039;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#039;re outta luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this this morning &#8220;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&#8221; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &#8220;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#8217;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#8217;re outta luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25268</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25268</guid>
		<description>Saw this this morning &quot;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&quot; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &quot;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&quot;



That&#039;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#039;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#039;re outta luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this this morning &#8220;Say you install, on your home, a 5-kilowatt system,&#8221; said Steve Weisman, director of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England. &#8220;A home with a 5-kilowatt system in New England can expect, based on a predictable amount of sunshine, to operate at 15 percent capacity, or to produce around 6,570 kilowatt hours a year.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s less output for a 5 KW system than California, but that&#8217;s enough to cover my annual kwh needs. But if trees, yeah, you&#8217;re outta luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-8068</guid>
		<description>If thats what PGE says, then I&#039;m sure it will get there.



Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#039;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats what PGE says, then I&#8217;m sure it will get there.</p>
<p>Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#8217;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25264</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25264</guid>
		<description>If thats what PGE says, then I&#039;m sure it will get there.



Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#039;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats what PGE says, then I&#8217;m sure it will get there.</p>
<p>Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#8217;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25265</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25265</guid>
		<description>If thats what PGE says, then I&#039;m sure it will get there.



Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#039;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats what PGE says, then I&#8217;m sure it will get there.</p>
<p>Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#8217;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25266</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25266</guid>
		<description>If thats what PGE says, then I&#039;m sure it will get there.



Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#039;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats what PGE says, then I&#8217;m sure it will get there.</p>
<p>Yeh I already know what my solar looks like, no sun for half the year literally and probably too much tree cover too. Still I&#8217;d prefer to go DIY (give my jobs to me) and go half off grid for electronics &amp; lighting load and not mess with the tie in or intermittent high amp load. Over here we need to pay more attention to thermal issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-8067</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-8067</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#039;s not off-grid.



Don&#039;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side - PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#039;s power coming off rooftops: that&#039;s the limit that&#039;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.



Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#8217;s not off-grid.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side &#8211; PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#8217;s power coming off rooftops: that&#8217;s the limit that&#8217;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.</p>
<p>Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25261</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25261</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#039;s not off-grid.



Don&#039;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side - PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#039;s power coming off rooftops: that&#039;s the limit that&#039;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.



Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#8217;s not off-grid.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side &#8211; PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#8217;s power coming off rooftops: that&#8217;s the limit that&#8217;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.</p>
<p>Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/06/rooftop-solar-4-of-sonoma-countys-power/#comment-25262</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4139#comment-25262</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#039;s not off-grid.



Don&#039;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side - PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#039;s power coming off rooftops: that&#039;s the limit that&#039;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.



Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is no reason not to be grid tied in Sonoma, it&#8217;s not off-grid.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry: PG&amp;E/solar installation companies here are capable of handling the technical side &#8211; PG&amp;E is aiming to get to 3.5% of the whole state&#8217;s power coming off rooftops: that&#8217;s the limit that&#8217;s set for now with the CPUC, and may be raised.</p>
<p>Plus most of these are just homes with like a 4 KW system each. If it does go nationwide, you should get a quote anyway, for the heck of it. Estimates are free, and even in New England you could probably swap your utility bill for an equal sum to the solar mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

