<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Indicators of Success at Copenhagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/04/five-indicators-of-success-at-copenhagen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/04/five-indicators-of-success-at-copenhagen/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/04/five-indicators-of-success-at-copenhagen/#comment-25247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4120#comment-25247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Legally binding&quot; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#039;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Legally binding&#8221; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#8217;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/04/five-indicators-of-success-at-copenhagen/#comment-25248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4120#comment-25248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Legally binding&quot; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#039;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Legally binding&#8221; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#8217;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/12/04/five-indicators-of-success-at-copenhagen/#comment-8024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4120#comment-8024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Legally binding&quot; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#039;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Legally binding&#8221; is nonsense in the case of the United States and likely at least some other nations.  Nothing in the way of international agreements can be legally binding on the U.S. without ratification by the U.S. Senate.  It&#8217;s a Constitutional provision designed to prevent the Executive from binding the U.S. without advise and consent of the Senate, which essentially represents the States and, thereby, the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
