<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Counterargument to Price on Carbon Hurting Jobs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-8325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-8325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are all &quot;green&quot; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#039;t cut it.  If you can&#039;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#039;s hardly &quot;innovative&quot;.



I don&#039;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#039;re never going to get there.



Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all &#8220;green&#8221; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  If you can&#8217;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#8217;s hardly &#8220;innovative&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#8217;re never going to get there.</p>
<p>Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-25127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-25127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are all &quot;green&quot; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#039;t cut it.  If you can&#039;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#039;s hardly &quot;innovative&quot;.



I don&#039;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#039;re never going to get there.



Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all &#8220;green&#8221; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  If you can&#8217;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#8217;s hardly &#8220;innovative&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#8217;re never going to get there.</p>
<p>Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-25128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-25128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are all &quot;green&quot; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#039;t cut it.  If you can&#039;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#039;s hardly &quot;innovative&quot;.



I don&#039;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#039;re never going to get there.



Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all &#8220;green&#8221; people who like to do a lot of talking and not a lot of doing.  The babysitter argument just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  If you can&#8217;t do anything to make it cost-effective, too, then it&#8217;s hardly &#8220;innovative&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t sympathize with the Republican point of view in the least, since they are the last to stand by the middle class (in reality), and they offer no real solutions.  But the cost of investing in alternative energy is still extremely high right now, and unless heavily focus on cost-effective means like algae, and move away from expensive means such as hydrogen, we&#8217;re never going to get there.</p>
<p>Also, we should remove subsidies to oil companies and transfer them to alternative energy companies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-25125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-25125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant.



“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”



Right on. That hits it home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
<p>“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”</p>
<p>Right on. That hits it home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-25126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-25126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant.



“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”



Right on. That hits it home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
<p>“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”</p>
<p>Right on. That hits it home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/best-counterargument-to-price-on-carbon-hurting-jobs/#comment-8324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=4000#comment-8324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant.



“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”



Right on. That hits it home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
<p>“If you had a child molester in your neighborhood who’s offering babysitting for $7 per hour, and then a nice girl named Betty comes and says she charges $10 per hour, are you going to say, ’sorry Betty, he only charges $7′.”</p>
<p>Right on. That hits it home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
