<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How You Can End Climate Change by Buying Pollution Permits on the Cap and Trade Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-7789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-7789</guid>
		<description>Um, are you people retarded? This whole cap and trade thing is going to ruin the modern world as we go into a dark age controlled by the U.N. I won&#039;t be surprised if i get fined for using too much toilet paper in the near future. I&#039;m not saying we shouldn&#039;t conserve and recycle but to do this so blindly is just dumb, we deserve what we get i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, are you people retarded? This whole cap and trade thing is going to ruin the modern world as we go into a dark age controlled by the U.N. I won&#8217;t be surprised if i get fined for using too much toilet paper in the near future. I&#8217;m not saying we shouldn&#8217;t conserve and recycle but to do this so blindly is just dumb, we deserve what we get i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-24844</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-24844</guid>
		<description>Um, are you people retarded? This whole cap and trade thing is going to ruin the modern world as we go into a dark age controlled by the U.N. I won&#039;t be surprised if i get fined for using too much toilet paper in the near future. I&#039;m not saying we shouldn&#039;t conserve and recycle but to do this so blindly is just dumb, we deserve what we get i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, are you people retarded? This whole cap and trade thing is going to ruin the modern world as we go into a dark age controlled by the U.N. I won&#8217;t be surprised if i get fined for using too much toilet paper in the near future. I&#8217;m not saying we shouldn&#8217;t conserve and recycle but to do this so blindly is just dumb, we deserve what we get i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-7788</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-7788</guid>
		<description>And if you don&#039;t like WaPo for it being part of big media, jump straight to the video by the EPA lawyers themselves:



http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you don&#8217;t like WaPo for it being part of big media, jump straight to the video by the EPA lawyers themselves:</p>
<p><a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/" rel="nofollow">http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-24843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-24843</guid>
		<description>And if you don&#039;t like WaPo for it being part of big media, jump straight to the video by the EPA lawyers themselves:



http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you don&#8217;t like WaPo for it being part of big media, jump straight to the video by the EPA lawyers themselves:</p>
<p><a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/" rel="nofollow">http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/epa-lawyers-challenge-cap-and-trade-for-climate/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-7787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-7787</guid>
		<description>While I realize that big media may be funded by polluting industries, and I also agree that nobody is obliged to find &#039;facts from gross, icky conservative think-tanks...



I believe that runaway optimism manifest in limited viewpoints is a much worse type of pollution.



So, here, consider this article from two EPA lawyers:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I realize that big media may be funded by polluting industries, and I also agree that nobody is obliged to find &#8216;facts from gross, icky conservative think-tanks&#8230;</p>
<p>I believe that runaway optimism manifest in limited viewpoints is a much worse type of pollution.</p>
<p>So, here, consider this article from two EPA lawyers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-24842</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-24842</guid>
		<description>While I realize that big media may be funded by polluting industries, and I also agree that nobody is obliged to find &#039;facts from gross, icky conservative think-tanks...



I believe that runaway optimism manifest in limited viewpoints is a much worse type of pollution.



So, here, consider this article from two EPA lawyers:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I realize that big media may be funded by polluting industries, and I also agree that nobody is obliged to find &#8216;facts from gross, icky conservative think-tanks&#8230;</p>
<p>I believe that runaway optimism manifest in limited viewpoints is a much worse type of pollution.</p>
<p>So, here, consider this article from two EPA lawyers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103002988.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-7786</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-7786</guid>
		<description>Ian, all of my source links in that series are all to the original environmental economists like Robert Stavins (on Why Free Allowances Are OK) who have worked for decades designing and refining legislation to reduce carbon pollution.



Or to studies like the German Marshall Fund Study on how Europe DID in fact reduce its carbon footprint successfully using (even flawed)(but fixable)cap and trade.



Unlike big media, this tiny blog is not funded by polluting industries, so I am not obliged to find my facts and studies from polluter-industry funded groups like the Cato Institute or the Heritage Foundation, which is deliberately fanning fears about climate legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, all of my source links in that series are all to the original environmental economists like Robert Stavins (on Why Free Allowances Are OK) who have worked for decades designing and refining legislation to reduce carbon pollution.</p>
<p>Or to studies like the German Marshall Fund Study on how Europe DID in fact reduce its carbon footprint successfully using (even flawed)(but fixable)cap and trade.</p>
<p>Unlike big media, this tiny blog is not funded by polluting industries, so I am not obliged to find my facts and studies from polluter-industry funded groups like the Cato Institute or the Heritage Foundation, which is deliberately fanning fears about climate legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-24841</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-24841</guid>
		<description>Ian, all of my source links in that series are all to the original environmental economists like Robert Stavins (on Why Free Allowances Are OK) who have worked for decades designing and refining legislation to reduce carbon pollution.



Or to studies like the German Marshall Fund Study on how Europe DID in fact reduce its carbon footprint successfully using (even flawed)(but fixable)cap and trade.



Unlike big media, this tiny blog is not funded by polluting industries, so I am not obliged to find my facts and studies from polluter-industry funded groups like the Cato Institute or the Heritage Foundation, which is deliberately fanning fears about climate legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, all of my source links in that series are all to the original environmental economists like Robert Stavins (on Why Free Allowances Are OK) who have worked for decades designing and refining legislation to reduce carbon pollution.</p>
<p>Or to studies like the German Marshall Fund Study on how Europe DID in fact reduce its carbon footprint successfully using (even flawed)(but fixable)cap and trade.</p>
<p>Unlike big media, this tiny blog is not funded by polluting industries, so I am not obliged to find my facts and studies from polluter-industry funded groups like the Cato Institute or the Heritage Foundation, which is deliberately fanning fears about climate legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-7785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-7785</guid>
		<description>As with your last post on allowances (http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/), all I see is narrow reporting and wishful thinking. Your argumentation is almost entirely self-referential!



Take into consideration a wider array of evidence (like this excellent piece:

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/) and also, do what you can to deal with comments like Sharon&#039;s (http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149).



That would be better blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with your last post on allowances (<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/</a>), all I see is narrow reporting and wishful thinking. Your argumentation is almost entirely self-referential!</p>
<p>Take into consideration a wider array of evidence (like this excellent piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/" rel="nofollow">http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/</a>) and also, do what you can to deal with comments like Sharon&#8217;s (<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149</a>).</p>
<p>That would be better blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/how-you-can-end-climate-change-by-buying-pollution-permits-on-the-cap-and-trade-market/#comment-24840</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3800#comment-24840</guid>
		<description>As with your last post on allowances (http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/), all I see is narrow reporting and wishful thinking. Your argumentation is almost entirely self-referential!



Take into consideration a wider array of evidence (like this excellent piece:

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/) and also, do what you can to deal with comments like Sharon&#039;s (http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149).



That would be better blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with your last post on allowances (<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/</a>), all I see is narrow reporting and wishful thinking. Your argumentation is almost entirely self-referential!</p>
<p>Take into consideration a wider array of evidence (like this excellent piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/" rel="nofollow">http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/climate-change-policy-and-safe-investing/</a>) and also, do what you can to deal with comments like Sharon&#8217;s (<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/cap-and-trade-101-why-free-allowances-are-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-101149</a>).</p>
<p>That would be better blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

