<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New NIMBY-Defeating Wind Turbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunzyk</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-103741</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunzyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-103741</guid>
		<description>Yes, that device looks discreet and possibly silent (as any tangential blower is). Only trouble is, you have no choice as to the orientation with respect to the wind direction, nor any adjustment with the latter; so, it ight be it is not the most efficient option in many cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that device looks discreet and possibly silent (as any tangential blower is). Only trouble is, you have no choice as to the orientation with respect to the wind direction, nor any adjustment with the latter; so, it ight be it is not the most efficient option in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102779</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102779</guid>
		<description>excellently said. thanks for chiming in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellently said. thanks for chiming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kplzthx</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102764</link>
		<dc:creator>Kplzthx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102764</guid>
		<description>You can only hear the sound produced by wind turbines when you are basically stood next to them. The majority of them are placed in areas away from large populations. People who complain about them are fussy. They don&#039;t spoil the landscape in my opinion, in fact I think they look rather majestic. Pipe down and stop moaning. Or would you rather they built a nice big coal power station in that field over there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can only hear the sound produced by wind turbines when you are basically stood next to them. The majority of them are placed in areas away from large populations. People who complain about them are fussy. They don&#8217;t spoil the landscape in my opinion, in fact I think they look rather majestic. Pipe down and stop moaning. Or would you rather they built a nice big coal power station in that field over there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlipBlap</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102650</link>
		<dc:creator>BlipBlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102650</guid>
		<description>Awesome. I want one. Hope this comes to market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. I want one. Hope this comes to market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reikiman</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102584</link>
		<dc:creator>reikiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102584</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine this would solve the vibration problems - in that the moving turbine blades will make vibrations, that are then transmitted into the building. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine this would solve the vibration problems &#8211; in that the moving turbine blades will make vibrations, that are then transmitted into the building. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia Lake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102372</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102372</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to hurt bats.  I want them around to eat mosquitos. No bats roost on my roof though.  They don&#039;t even strafe it.  They flit around the trees catching insects on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to hurt bats.  I want them around to eat mosquitos. No bats roost on my roof though.  They don&#8217;t even strafe it.  They flit around the trees catching insects on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarilynWann</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-102171</link>
		<dc:creator>MarilynWann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-102171</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of having eco-friendly, power-generating non-denominational prayer wheels on my roofline. I&#039;m just wondering if there&#039;d be a problem with vibration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of having eco-friendly, power-generating non-denominational prayer wheels on my roofline. I&#8217;m just wondering if there&#8217;d be a problem with vibration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-101810</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-101810</guid>
		<description>This is the kind of innovation that will generate support. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the kind of innovation that will generate support. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sertowers33</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-101099</link>
		<dc:creator>Sertowers33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-101099</guid>
		<description>Beacon Power is working with Gaelectric on storage and fast response needs.
&quot;Brendan McGrath, Gaelectric Group CEO, said: &quot;Our initial focus in developing energy storage was compressed air energy storage (CAES), which is an hours-to-days storage solution. But as we learned more about the energy balancing issues related to wind deployment in Ireland, the UK and Montana, we saw the need to add a storage solution in the seconds-to-minutes timeframe. Beacon&#039;s flywheel technology is extremely effective in providing this service, and their energy storage systems can be deployed incrementally as wind assets are deployed. We&#039;re tremendously excited by this collaboration. It gives us better control over our ability to develop wind projects where we want, and it complements CAES, our other energy storage offering.&quot;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beacon Power is working with Gaelectric on storage and fast response needs.<br />
&#8220;Brendan McGrath, Gaelectric Group CEO, said: &#8220;Our initial focus in developing energy storage was compressed air energy storage (CAES), which is an hours-to-days storage solution. But as we learned more about the energy balancing issues related to wind deployment in Ireland, the UK and Montana, we saw the need to add a storage solution in the seconds-to-minutes timeframe. Beacon&#8217;s flywheel technology is extremely effective in providing this service, and their energy storage systems can be deployed incrementally as wind assets are deployed. We&#8217;re tremendously excited by this collaboration. It gives us better control over our ability to develop wind projects where we want, and it complements CAES, our other energy storage offering.&#8221;"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graw!!!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-100426</link>
		<dc:creator>Graw!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-100426</guid>
		<description>Hey how do bats fare with this design traditional wind turbines wreak havoc on bat populations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey how do bats fare with this design traditional wind turbines wreak havoc on bat populations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-100360</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-100360</guid>
		<description>Personally I don&#039;t like the whole nimby argument. If you give people the alternative of having a coal or nuclear plant in their back yard, they don&#039;t like these either. Besides, those look even worse. Still I like the fact that you can mount these turbines on existing roofs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t like the whole nimby argument. If you give people the alternative of having a coal or nuclear plant in their back yard, they don&#8217;t like these either. Besides, those look even worse. Still I like the fact that you can mount these turbines on existing roofs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-99833</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-99833</guid>
		<description>No information about the nominal power for a regular house. No price too.

Well it looks difficult to figure something about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No information about the nominal power for a regular house. No price too.</p>
<p>Well it looks difficult to figure something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-99831</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-99831</guid>
		<description>From wind turbine to sperm ejaculation. You have to read it to believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From wind turbine to sperm ejaculation. You have to read it to believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Williams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-99778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-99778</guid>
		<description>Mr. Milton: See also your own site: Clean Technica, for an answer on two counts - or were you just testing to see who was paying attention? Perhaps, this comment of yours came out before those two articles.
In any event, I liked your article about yet another quieter and low profile wind generator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Milton: See also your own site: Clean Technica, for an answer on two counts &#8211; or were you just testing to see who was paying attention? Perhaps, this comment of yours came out before those two articles.<br />
In any event, I liked your article about yet another quieter and low profile wind generator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Williams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/23/the-new-nimby-defeating-wind-turbine/#comment-99777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3787#comment-99777</guid>
		<description>Robert: Not so, since you speak in absolutes. There are energy companies in the U.S. that buy back power not being used (from residences.) Please read more. And then you correct yourself. Well good for you (shows some humility.) Yet, I&#039;d be careful making any predictions about the future, as you do (in your one month ago comment.) You may wish to also stop attempting to pigeonhole the conversation into : wind won&#039;t replace coal paradigms, lest you also have to correct yourself again (oops, already did.) Seriously, there are many ways to generate electricity or energy aside from the wind(as you later seem to acknowledge.) Thus far, (See how I carefully worded that?), sustainable energy is the wave (pun intended) of the future.
Best wishes and keep learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert: Not so, since you speak in absolutes. There are energy companies in the U.S. that buy back power not being used (from residences.) Please read more. And then you correct yourself. Well good for you (shows some humility.) Yet, I&#8217;d be careful making any predictions about the future, as you do (in your one month ago comment.) You may wish to also stop attempting to pigeonhole the conversation into : wind won&#8217;t replace coal paradigms, lest you also have to correct yourself again (oops, already did.) Seriously, there are many ways to generate electricity or energy aside from the wind(as you later seem to acknowledge.) Thus far, (See how I carefully worded that?), sustainable energy is the wave (pun intended) of the future.<br />
Best wishes and keep learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

