<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landfill Biogas &#8211; The Rodney Dangerfield of Renewable Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: miggs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-7631</link>
		<dc:creator>miggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-7631</guid>
		<description>Susan, good piece.  Yep, the EPA has done good work showing how much potential there is in recovering waste energy.  In fact, EPA and DOE studies suggest there&#039;s enough RECOVERABLE waste energy now (mostly heat) to cut our country&#039;s greenhouse gas emissions by 20%.  And that&#039;s with current technology -- nothing more would need to be developed.  Most of the savings would come from combined heat &amp; power at manufacturing plants, and other savings would come from straight waste energy recovery at such facilities.



Now as I&#039;ve mentioned before, I&#039;m not entirely unbiased since I&#039;m associated with Recycled Energy Development, which does this work.  RED&#039;s president Sean Casten has written for CleanTechnica before, as well.  The reason we&#039;re involved with energy recycling is the massive opportunity, and the U.S. should be doing everything possible to take advantage of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, good piece.  Yep, the EPA has done good work showing how much potential there is in recovering waste energy.  In fact, EPA and DOE studies suggest there&#8217;s enough RECOVERABLE waste energy now (mostly heat) to cut our country&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions by 20%.  And that&#8217;s with current technology &#8212; nothing more would need to be developed.  Most of the savings would come from combined heat &amp; power at manufacturing plants, and other savings would come from straight waste energy recovery at such facilities.</p>
<p>Now as I&#8217;ve mentioned before, I&#8217;m not entirely unbiased since I&#8217;m associated with Recycled Energy Development, which does this work.  RED&#8217;s president Sean Casten has written for CleanTechnica before, as well.  The reason we&#8217;re involved with energy recycling is the massive opportunity, and the U.S. should be doing everything possible to take advantage of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miggs</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-24632</link>
		<dc:creator>miggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-24632</guid>
		<description>Susan, good piece.  Yep, the EPA has done good work showing how much potential there is in recovering waste energy.  In fact, EPA and DOE studies suggest there&#039;s enough RECOVERABLE waste energy now (mostly heat) to cut our country&#039;s greenhouse gas emissions by 20%.  And that&#039;s with current technology -- nothing more would need to be developed.  Most of the savings would come from combined heat &amp; power at manufacturing plants, and other savings would come from straight waste energy recovery at such facilities.



Now as I&#039;ve mentioned before, I&#039;m not entirely unbiased since I&#039;m associated with Recycled Energy Development, which does this work.  RED&#039;s president Sean Casten has written for CleanTechnica before, as well.  The reason we&#039;re involved with energy recycling is the massive opportunity, and the U.S. should be doing everything possible to take advantage of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, good piece.  Yep, the EPA has done good work showing how much potential there is in recovering waste energy.  In fact, EPA and DOE studies suggest there&#8217;s enough RECOVERABLE waste energy now (mostly heat) to cut our country&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions by 20%.  And that&#8217;s with current technology &#8212; nothing more would need to be developed.  Most of the savings would come from combined heat &amp; power at manufacturing plants, and other savings would come from straight waste energy recovery at such facilities.</p>
<p>Now as I&#8217;ve mentioned before, I&#8217;m not entirely unbiased since I&#8217;m associated with Recycled Energy Development, which does this work.  RED&#8217;s president Sean Casten has written for CleanTechnica before, as well.  The reason we&#8217;re involved with energy recycling is the massive opportunity, and the U.S. should be doing everything possible to take advantage of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-7630</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-7630</guid>
		<description>See? No respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See? No respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-24631</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-24631</guid>
		<description>See? No respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See? No respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-7629</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-7629</guid>
		<description>Thanks, fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-24630</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-24630</guid>
		<description>Thanks, fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-7628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-7628</guid>
		<description>Roger?? Are you sure its not Rodney Dangerfield</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger?? Are you sure its not Rodney Dangerfield</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-24629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-24629</guid>
		<description>Roger?? Are you sure its not Rodney Dangerfield</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger?? Are you sure its not Rodney Dangerfield</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flynn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-7627</link>
		<dc:creator>Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-7627</guid>
		<description>Uhh...do you mean Rodney Dangerfield?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh&#8230;do you mean Rodney Dangerfield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flynn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comment-24628</link>
		<dc:creator>Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3740#comment-24628</guid>
		<description>Uhh...do you mean Rodney Dangerfield?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh&#8230;do you mean Rodney Dangerfield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

