<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New California Bill Gives More Money to Small-Scale Solar Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSR0601</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-7550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HSR0601]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-7550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve learned leasing solar panels in California made a big success as it relieves the pressure of up-front cost, I&#039;m hopeful this innovative idea can spread world-wide.



It would be true of leasing battery of EVs, as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned leasing solar panels in California made a big success as it relieves the pressure of up-front cost, I&#8217;m hopeful this innovative idea can spread world-wide.</p>
<p>It would be true of leasing battery of EVs, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSR0601</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-24601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HSR0601]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-24601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve learned leasing solar panels in California made a big success as it relieves the pressure of up-front cost, I&#039;m hopeful this innovative idea can spread world-wide.



It would be true of leasing battery of EVs, as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned leasing solar panels in California made a big success as it relieves the pressure of up-front cost, I&#8217;m hopeful this innovative idea can spread world-wide.</p>
<p>It would be true of leasing battery of EVs, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Reardon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal Reardon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-7549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill W - The tariff wasn&#039;t extended to residential customers because they are already eligible for net energy metering and CA Solar Initiative incentives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill W &#8211; The tariff wasn&#8217;t extended to residential customers because they are already eligible for net energy metering and CA Solar Initiative incentives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Reardon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-24600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal Reardon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-24600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill W - The tariff wasn&#039;t extended to residential customers because they are already eligible for net energy metering and CA Solar Initiative incentives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill W &#8211; The tariff wasn&#8217;t extended to residential customers because they are already eligible for net energy metering and CA Solar Initiative incentives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solarMD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-7548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solarMD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-7548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;above market&#039; rate of 15C to 17C would not be a strong incentive as an investment.  It is a merciful concession to appeace the utilities by Arnold.

I checked around the North East states, the nominal rates are around 12C plus 6C for delivery. If the prevalent Netmetering, time-of-use rate structure  is applicable, then it may be more attractive.

Like to see what PPA contractors think about this limited feed-in-tariff ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;above market&#8217; rate of 15C to 17C would not be a strong incentive as an investment.  It is a merciful concession to appeace the utilities by Arnold.</p>
<p>I checked around the North East states, the nominal rates are around 12C plus 6C for delivery. If the prevalent Netmetering, time-of-use rate structure  is applicable, then it may be more attractive.</p>
<p>Like to see what PPA contractors think about this limited feed-in-tariff ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solarMD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-24599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solarMD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-24599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;above market&#039; rate of 15C to 17C would not be a strong incentive as an investment.  It is a merciful concession to appeace the utilities by Arnold.

I checked around the North East states, the nominal rates are around 12C plus 6C for delivery. If the prevalent Netmetering, time-of-use rate structure  is applicable, then it may be more attractive.

Like to see what PPA contractors think about this limited feed-in-tariff ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;above market&#8217; rate of 15C to 17C would not be a strong incentive as an investment.  It is a merciful concession to appeace the utilities by Arnold.</p>
<p>I checked around the North East states, the nominal rates are around 12C plus 6C for delivery. If the prevalent Netmetering, time-of-use rate structure  is applicable, then it may be more attractive.</p>
<p>Like to see what PPA contractors think about this limited feed-in-tariff ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Patriot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-7547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-7547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not a complete solution, this is a great step forward that will encourage the construction of additional solar installations.  Hopefully this approach will find widespread acceptance with other states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not a complete solution, this is a great step forward that will encourage the construction of additional solar installations.  Hopefully this approach will find widespread acceptance with other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Patriot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-24598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-24598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not a complete solution, this is a great step forward that will encourage the construction of additional solar installations.  Hopefully this approach will find widespread acceptance with other states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not a complete solution, this is a great step forward that will encourage the construction of additional solar installations.  Hopefully this approach will find widespread acceptance with other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-7546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-7546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a shame they didn&#039;t extend this tariff down to the level of residential systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame they didn&#8217;t extend this tariff down to the level of residential systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/#comment-24597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3678#comment-24597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a shame they didn&#039;t extend this tariff down to the level of residential systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame they didn&#8217;t extend this tariff down to the level of residential systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
