Comments on: US Department of Energy Dishes Out $87 Million for Solar Technology and Deployment http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 By: Ian http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-7487 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:42:55 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-7487 I recognize that you recognize the link to the other story… thanks for pointing that out. Ironically, that other story ALSO mentions the funding amount.

In my view, there is really no purpose in such redundant posting.

Again, Where is the actual investigation? Where is the original contributions??

]]> By: Ian http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-24592 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:42:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-24592 I recognize that you recognize the link to the other story… thanks for pointing that out. Ironically, that other story ALSO mentions the funding amount.

In my view, there is really no purpose in such redundant posting.

Again, Where is the actual investigation? Where is the original contributions??

]]> By: Zach http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-7486 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:13:04 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-7486 @Ian: the link in the subheading goes straight to that page you sent the link for.

the difference is that the first article was covering the decathlon, but this one was covering what the DOE just awarded money for — (announced at the decathlon, but a separate topic)

thanks for your comment, otherwise.

]]> By: Zach http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-24590 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:13:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-24590 @Ian: the link in the subheading goes straight to that page you sent the link for.

the difference is that the first article was covering the decathlon, but this one was covering what the DOE just awarded money for — (announced at the decathlon, but a separate topic)

thanks for your comment, otherwise.

]]> By: Zach http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-24591 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:13:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-24591 @Ian: the link in the subheading goes straight to that page you sent the link for.

the difference is that the first article was covering the decathlon, but this one was covering what the DOE just awarded money for — (announced at the decathlon, but a separate topic)

thanks for your comment, otherwise.

]]> By: Ian http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-7485 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:19:37 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-7485 Um… sorry, but didn’t someone already write about the Solar Decathlon? See http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/solar-takes-over-washington-dc-solar-decathlon-2009-begins/

I feel that CleanTechnica is becoming a trading post for regurgitation, and too many posts are just Oh-I-think-I’ll-summarize-a-press-release.

Where is the actual investigation? Where is the original contributions??

]]> By: Ian http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/us-department-of-energy-dishes-out-87-million-for-solar-technology-and-deployment/#comment-24589 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:19:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3669#comment-24589 Um… sorry, but didn’t someone already write about the Solar Decathlon? See http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/solar-takes-over-washington-dc-solar-decathlon-2009-begins/

I feel that CleanTechnica is becoming a trading post for regurgitation, and too many posts are just Oh-I-think-I’ll-summarize-a-press-release.

Where is the actual investigation? Where is the original contributions??

]]>