<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Green Is the New Sprint &#039;Reclaim&#039; Phone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Simmons</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/#comment-7498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Simmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3444#comment-7498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wondered why you wrote - &#039;[...] paper stock that clearly had some percentage of recycled content in it[...]&#039;? How is &#039;some percentage&#039; discernible? 100% recycled paper comes in every grade of paper from photocopier/proof grade, to high quality art board you couldn&#039;t tell from the same item made from virgin rain forest timber. The idea that recycled paper has flecks of colours and fibres throughout or is in any way different in appearance is so out of date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered why you wrote &#8211; &#8216;[&#8230;] paper stock that clearly had some percentage of recycled content in it[&#8230;]&#8217;? How is &#8216;some percentage&#8217; discernible? 100% recycled paper comes in every grade of paper from photocopier/proof grade, to high quality art board you couldn&#8217;t tell from the same item made from virgin rain forest timber. The idea that recycled paper has flecks of colours and fibres throughout or is in any way different in appearance is so out of date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Simmons</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/#comment-24375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Simmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3444#comment-24375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wondered why you wrote - &#039;[...] paper stock that clearly had some percentage of recycled content in it[...]&#039;? How is &#039;some percentage&#039; discernible? 100% recycled paper comes in every grade of paper from photocopier/proof grade, to high quality art board you couldn&#039;t tell from the same item made from virgin rain forest timber. The idea that recycled paper has flecks of colours and fibres throughout or is in any way different in appearance is so out of date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered why you wrote &#8211; &#8216;[&#8230;] paper stock that clearly had some percentage of recycled content in it[&#8230;]&#8217;? How is &#8216;some percentage&#8217; discernible? 100% recycled paper comes in every grade of paper from photocopier/proof grade, to high quality art board you couldn&#8217;t tell from the same item made from virgin rain forest timber. The idea that recycled paper has flecks of colours and fibres throughout or is in any way different in appearance is so out of date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/#comment-7497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3444#comment-7497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand it takes 60 hours of sunlight to fully charge this, I think some sort of kinetic motion energy capture technology, sort of like the flashlights you shake, would be better, miniturized, newer technology but something on this principple, and then we could just charge by walking, and shake the phone when the battery is low. Way more practical than solar. Solar should be for static applications, and some new tech should be used to capture energy from every vibration we can. Our washing machines probably could power a few lamps, if it were law that any new machine sold had motion energy recapture technology, it could be everywhere rather quickly. I wonder what is possible, or if the amount of energy is minimal. At the very least I want to see exercise equipment and small devices power themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand it takes 60 hours of sunlight to fully charge this, I think some sort of kinetic motion energy capture technology, sort of like the flashlights you shake, would be better, miniturized, newer technology but something on this principple, and then we could just charge by walking, and shake the phone when the battery is low. Way more practical than solar. Solar should be for static applications, and some new tech should be used to capture energy from every vibration we can. Our washing machines probably could power a few lamps, if it were law that any new machine sold had motion energy recapture technology, it could be everywhere rather quickly. I wonder what is possible, or if the amount of energy is minimal. At the very least I want to see exercise equipment and small devices power themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/12/how-green-is-the-new-sprint-reclaim-phone/#comment-24374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3444#comment-24374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand it takes 60 hours of sunlight to fully charge this, I think some sort of kinetic motion energy capture technology, sort of like the flashlights you shake, would be better, miniturized, newer technology but something on this principple, and then we could just charge by walking, and shake the phone when the battery is low. Way more practical than solar. Solar should be for static applications, and some new tech should be used to capture energy from every vibration we can. Our washing machines probably could power a few lamps, if it were law that any new machine sold had motion energy recapture technology, it could be everywhere rather quickly. I wonder what is possible, or if the amount of energy is minimal. At the very least I want to see exercise equipment and small devices power themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand it takes 60 hours of sunlight to fully charge this, I think some sort of kinetic motion energy capture technology, sort of like the flashlights you shake, would be better, miniturized, newer technology but something on this principple, and then we could just charge by walking, and shake the phone when the battery is low. Way more practical than solar. Solar should be for static applications, and some new tech should be used to capture energy from every vibration we can. Our washing machines probably could power a few lamps, if it were law that any new machine sold had motion energy recapture technology, it could be everywhere rather quickly. I wonder what is possible, or if the amount of energy is minimal. At the very least I want to see exercise equipment and small devices power themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
