<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 90% of Coal Plant CO2 Captured in 12-Month Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: YOUR MOM!!!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-95760</link>
		<dc:creator>YOUR MOM!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-95760</guid>
		<description>ohk you peeps are nerds :P :* haha!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohk you peeps are nerds <img src='http://c1cleantechnicacom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  :* haha!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-7396</link>
		<dc:creator>marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-7396</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s great if we can figure out ways to take CO2 out of the atmosphere, but using CCS technology to justify the construction of new fossil fuel based power plants is foolish.



further, for the shear volume of CO2 we&#039;re talking about, there&#039;d be an incredible transport issue.  basic chemistry will tell you that for every ton of carbon that goes into the plant (in the form of coal or gas) will have to come out as oxygen from the atmosphere added to it (more mass!).



right now the most brilliant idea I&#039;ve seen to deal with large amounts of solid CO2 is to make giant missles out of it and shoot them to the ocean.  building-sized CO2 rockets, every 10 minutes, ad infinitum... to deal with all the CO2 we put out.





clearly, we need to stop producing CO2, first and foremost.  this technology might help to undue some of the damage we&#039;ve already done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great if we can figure out ways to take CO2 out of the atmosphere, but using CCS technology to justify the construction of new fossil fuel based power plants is foolish.</p>
<p>further, for the shear volume of CO2 we&#8217;re talking about, there&#8217;d be an incredible transport issue.  basic chemistry will tell you that for every ton of carbon that goes into the plant (in the form of coal or gas) will have to come out as oxygen from the atmosphere added to it (more mass!).</p>
<p>right now the most brilliant idea I&#8217;ve seen to deal with large amounts of solid CO2 is to make giant missles out of it and shoot them to the ocean.  building-sized CO2 rockets, every 10 minutes, ad infinitum&#8230; to deal with all the CO2 we put out.</p>
<p>clearly, we need to stop producing CO2, first and foremost.  this technology might help to undue some of the damage we&#8217;ve already done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-24569</link>
		<dc:creator>marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-24569</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s great if we can figure out ways to take CO2 out of the atmosphere, but using CCS technology to justify the construction of new fossil fuel based power plants is foolish.



further, for the shear volume of CO2 we&#039;re talking about, there&#039;d be an incredible transport issue.  basic chemistry will tell you that for every ton of carbon that goes into the plant (in the form of coal or gas) will have to come out as oxygen from the atmosphere added to it (more mass!).



right now the most brilliant idea I&#039;ve seen to deal with large amounts of solid CO2 is to make giant missles out of it and shoot them to the ocean.  building-sized CO2 rockets, every 10 minutes, ad infinitum... to deal with all the CO2 we put out.





clearly, we need to stop producing CO2, first and foremost.  this technology might help to undue some of the damage we&#039;ve already done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great if we can figure out ways to take CO2 out of the atmosphere, but using CCS technology to justify the construction of new fossil fuel based power plants is foolish.</p>
<p>further, for the shear volume of CO2 we&#8217;re talking about, there&#8217;d be an incredible transport issue.  basic chemistry will tell you that for every ton of carbon that goes into the plant (in the form of coal or gas) will have to come out as oxygen from the atmosphere added to it (more mass!).</p>
<p>right now the most brilliant idea I&#8217;ve seen to deal with large amounts of solid CO2 is to make giant missles out of it and shoot them to the ocean.  building-sized CO2 rockets, every 10 minutes, ad infinitum&#8230; to deal with all the CO2 we put out.</p>
<p>clearly, we need to stop producing CO2, first and foremost.  this technology might help to undue some of the damage we&#8217;ve already done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.



If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.



So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.</p>
<p>If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.</p>
<p>So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-24567</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-24567</guid>
		<description>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.



If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.



So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.</p>
<p>If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.</p>
<p>So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-24568</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-24568</guid>
		<description>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.



If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.



So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, um, no. You are not thinking carefully. The test was on a SEPARATED portion of the emissions.</p>
<p>If you could do an initial test on the ENTIRE smokestack output, the test would be a impractically gigantic investment, and never get done.</p>
<p>So you section off a tiny fraction (5%) and test capturing that CO2 in that smokestack portion. They captured 90% of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-7394</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-7394</guid>
		<description>anhydrous ammonia - sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#039;t? Even too much water can kill you!



I&#039;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here - it&#039;s fertilizer!



Since it&#039;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#039;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981...



CBC - The National - anhydrous ammonia powered car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0hBAz6MxC4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anhydrous ammonia &#8211; sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#8217;t? Even too much water can kill you!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here &#8211; it&#8217;s fertilizer!</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#8217;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981&#8230;</p>
<p>CBC &#8211; The National &#8211; anhydrous ammonia powered car.</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/L0hBAz6MxC4/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>anhydrous ammonia - sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#039;t? Even too much water can kill you!



I&#039;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here - it&#039;s fertilizer!



Since it&#039;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#039;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981...



CBC - The National - anhydrous ammonia powered car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0hBAz6MxC4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anhydrous ammonia &#8211; sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#8217;t? Even too much water can kill you!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here &#8211; it&#8217;s fertilizer!</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#8217;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981&#8230;</p>
<p>CBC &#8211; The National &#8211; anhydrous ammonia powered car.</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/L0hBAz6MxC4/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-24566</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-24566</guid>
		<description>anhydrous ammonia - sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#039;t? Even too much water can kill you!



I&#039;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here - it&#039;s fertilizer!



Since it&#039;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#039;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981...



CBC - The National - anhydrous ammonia powered car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0hBAz6MxC4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anhydrous ammonia &#8211; sure it can be dangerous, what isn&#8217;t? Even too much water can kill you!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a huge farming area and there is literally tons of the stuff around here &#8211; it&#8217;s fertilizer!</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s Canadian Thanksgiving I&#8217;ll lend this link too, a car powered by anhydrous ammonia, Canada 1981&#8230;</p>
<p>CBC &#8211; The National &#8211; anhydrous ammonia powered car.</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/L0hBAz6MxC4/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blakeslee</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3647#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>The headline is a complete fraud. The test captured 90% of 5% of the output.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/business/63722982.html

Carbon Capture and Storage works fine for tiny amounts but the scale is being ignored like the elephant under the living room rug.

Beijing has a similar fake &quot;clean coal&quot; plant.

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/01/beijings-showcase-clean-coal-power-plant-54316</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline is a complete fraud. The test captured 90% of 5% of the output.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/business/63722982.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/business/63722982.html</a></p>
<p>Carbon Capture and Storage works fine for tiny amounts but the scale is being ignored like the elephant under the living room rug.</p>
<p>Beijing has a similar fake &#8220;clean coal&#8221; plant.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/01/beijings-showcase-clean-coal-power-plant-54316" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/01/beijings-showcase-clean-coal-power-plant-54316</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

