<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Wind Storage Worth Trillions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jagadees.s</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator>jagadees.s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7587</guid>
		<description>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jagadees.s</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24483</link>
		<dc:creator>jagadees.s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24483</guid>
		<description>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7586</link>
		<dc:creator>J Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7586</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&quot;



This isn&#039;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal...an extra one will come next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal&#8230;an extra one will come next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24482</link>
		<dc:creator>J Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24482</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&quot;



This isn&#039;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal...an extra one will come next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal&#8230;an extra one will come next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7585</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though…&quot;



Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.



http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though…&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24481</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24481</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though…&quot;



Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.



http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though…&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nehr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7584</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7584</guid>
		<description>Rich,



The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.



Try www.interstatetraveler.us and you will see the system outline for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.</p>
<p>Try <a href="http://www.interstatetraveler.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.interstatetraveler.us</a> and you will see the system outline for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nehr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24480</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24480</guid>
		<description>Rich,



The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.



Try www.interstatetraveler.us and you will see the system outline for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.</p>
<p>Try <a href="http://www.interstatetraveler.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.interstatetraveler.us</a> and you will see the system outline for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7583</guid>
		<description>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24479</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24479</guid>
		<description>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

