<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Wind Storage Worth Trillions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jagadees.s</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jagadees.s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jagadees.s</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jagadees.s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can build power plants near to coal mines and then use cable to transport power. But the did not. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&quot;



This isn&#039;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal...an extra one will come next week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal&#8230;an extra one will come next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&quot;



This isn&#039;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal...an extra one will come next week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, must arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t true.  Most coal facilities stockpile enough coal for 30-60 days worth of coal.  Only long-lasting (multi-week) rail service interruptions will cause coal generation to be curtailed.  Miss a train?  No big deal&#8230;an extra one will come next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though…&quot;



Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.



http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though…&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though…&quot;



Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.



http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though…&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I know of. Denmark has a system which stores wind-generated electricity by converting it into hydrogen oxide behind dams in Norway and Sweden. It costs Denmark dearly, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Arkiv/PDF/Wind_energy_-_the_case_of_Denmark.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nehr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Nehr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich,



The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.



Try www.interstatetraveler.us and you will see the system outline for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.</p>
<p>Try <a href="http://www.interstatetraveler.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.interstatetraveler.us</a> and you will see the system outline for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nehr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Nehr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich,



The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.



Try www.interstatetraveler.us and you will see the system outline for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>The USA has a systemlike that that stores solar energy with hydrogen and provides transportation as well! The system is called called HyRail or Interstate Traveler.</p>
<p>Try <a href="http://www.interstatetraveler.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.interstatetraveler.us</a> and you will see the system outline for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen - no idea on details though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Germany has a system which stores wind-generated electricity during non-peak hours by converting it into hydrogen &#8211; no idea on details though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea, Ed. We do need to find multiple paybacks like rail had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, Ed. We do need to find multiple paybacks like rail had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the very interesting points: Yeah, Big Coal is a terrific read that really hammers it home, chrisp. Sorry about those nights.



Yeah, Russ, the thousands of harebrained and/or(brilliant?) ideas we&#039;ll need to solve all these problems: what makes these times so compelling.



Bill W: That&#039;s a point. Now that the EPA is carefully tallying carbon, yeah, I wonder if that does include coal train emissions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very interesting points: Yeah, Big Coal is a terrific read that really hammers it home, chrisp. Sorry about those nights.</p>
<p>Yeah, Russ, the thousands of harebrained and/or(brilliant?) ideas we&#8217;ll need to solve all these problems: what makes these times so compelling.</p>
<p>Bill W: That&#8217;s a point. Now that the EPA is carefully tallying carbon, yeah, I wonder if that does include coal train emissions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed S.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever you may feel about the coal power infrastructure (rail, mainly) you cannot ignore the fact that it was put in place because it was useful to more industries than just electricity generation.  America was built on rail.  Whatever energy storage medium that is proposed will not face the same multi-use benefits of that infrastructure.  This makes investment difficult because 100% of the cost must be borne by electricity prices.  Sure, the consumer paid for rail to be developed, but it was spread out across hundreds of industries, including personal travel.



From a technical perspective I like the pairing of offshore wind turbines with some form of gravity or pressure fed water-based energy storage.  Hopefully this would minimize the complexity and cost of energy storage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you may feel about the coal power infrastructure (rail, mainly) you cannot ignore the fact that it was put in place because it was useful to more industries than just electricity generation.  America was built on rail.  Whatever energy storage medium that is proposed will not face the same multi-use benefits of that infrastructure.  This makes investment difficult because 100% of the cost must be borne by electricity prices.  Sure, the consumer paid for rail to be developed, but it was spread out across hundreds of industries, including personal travel.</p>
<p>From a technical perspective I like the pairing of offshore wind turbines with some form of gravity or pressure fed water-based energy storage.  Hopefully this would minimize the complexity and cost of energy storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed S.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever you may feel about the coal power infrastructure (rail, mainly) you cannot ignore the fact that it was put in place because it was useful to more industries than just electricity generation.  America was built on rail.  Whatever energy storage medium that is proposed will not face the same multi-use benefits of that infrastructure.  This makes investment difficult because 100% of the cost must be borne by electricity prices.  Sure, the consumer paid for rail to be developed, but it was spread out across hundreds of industries, including personal travel.



From a technical perspective I like the pairing of offshore wind turbines with some form of gravity or pressure fed water-based energy storage.  Hopefully this would minimize the complexity and cost of energy storage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you may feel about the coal power infrastructure (rail, mainly) you cannot ignore the fact that it was put in place because it was useful to more industries than just electricity generation.  America was built on rail.  Whatever energy storage medium that is proposed will not face the same multi-use benefits of that infrastructure.  This makes investment difficult because 100% of the cost must be borne by electricity prices.  Sure, the consumer paid for rail to be developed, but it was spread out across hundreds of industries, including personal travel.</p>
<p>From a technical perspective I like the pairing of offshore wind turbines with some form of gravity or pressure fed water-based energy storage.  Hopefully this would minimize the complexity and cost of energy storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This brings up an interesting point:  do the models used for calculating the pollution of coal-fired powerplants include the pollution caused by mining and delivering the coal for them?  If not, coal power is a lot dirtier than they&#039;re telling us.



This also points out that the railroads have a vested interest in fighting the shutdown/conversion of coal plants.  But maybe if we stop moving so much coal, we can move more of our goods being shipped back onto the railroads and off the highways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings up an interesting point:  do the models used for calculating the pollution of coal-fired powerplants include the pollution caused by mining and delivering the coal for them?  If not, coal power is a lot dirtier than they&#8217;re telling us.</p>
<p>This also points out that the railroads have a vested interest in fighting the shutdown/conversion of coal plants.  But maybe if we stop moving so much coal, we can move more of our goods being shipped back onto the railroads and off the highways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This brings up an interesting point:  do the models used for calculating the pollution of coal-fired powerplants include the pollution caused by mining and delivering the coal for them?  If not, coal power is a lot dirtier than they&#039;re telling us.



This also points out that the railroads have a vested interest in fighting the shutdown/conversion of coal plants.  But maybe if we stop moving so much coal, we can move more of our goods being shipped back onto the railroads and off the highways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings up an interesting point:  do the models used for calculating the pollution of coal-fired powerplants include the pollution caused by mining and delivering the coal for them?  If not, coal power is a lot dirtier than they&#8217;re telling us.</p>
<p>This also points out that the railroads have a vested interest in fighting the shutdown/conversion of coal plants.  But maybe if we stop moving so much coal, we can move more of our goods being shipped back onto the railroads and off the highways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea, Ed. We do need to find multiple paybacks like rail had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, Ed. We do need to find multiple paybacks like rail had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind, like solar is a wonderful fuel for power - maybe a little visual pollution but to me that is very minor. Now someone only has to prove an acceptable storage method!



For baseline power storage was easier with coal as the fuel is used on demand. With wind or solar the fuel comes first followed by demand - a bit more of a challenge.



There are a thousand ideas - a few good and some totally hare brained - when a company proves one we will see how much it adds to the power cost per kWh. Renewables are already more expensive - doubling the cost will not be a very acceptable solution.



I have studied storage of natural gas on an industrial basis in an attempt to buy cheap gas for later use. We gave it up as a loser as compression or liquifaction was prohibitively costly for large volumes.



It will be interesting to follow the progress in time to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind, like solar is a wonderful fuel for power &#8211; maybe a little visual pollution but to me that is very minor. Now someone only has to prove an acceptable storage method!</p>
<p>For baseline power storage was easier with coal as the fuel is used on demand. With wind or solar the fuel comes first followed by demand &#8211; a bit more of a challenge.</p>
<p>There are a thousand ideas &#8211; a few good and some totally hare brained &#8211; when a company proves one we will see how much it adds to the power cost per kWh. Renewables are already more expensive &#8211; doubling the cost will not be a very acceptable solution.</p>
<p>I have studied storage of natural gas on an industrial basis in an attempt to buy cheap gas for later use. We gave it up as a loser as compression or liquifaction was prohibitively costly for large volumes.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to follow the progress in time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-24474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-24474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind, like solar is a wonderful fuel for power - maybe a little visual pollution but to me that is very minor. Now someone only has to prove an acceptable storage method!



For baseline power storage was easier with coal as the fuel is used on demand. With wind or solar the fuel comes first followed by demand - a bit more of a challenge.



There are a thousand ideas - a few good and some totally hare brained - when a company proves one we will see how much it adds to the power cost per kWh. Renewables are already more expensive - doubling the cost will not be a very acceptable solution.



I have studied storage of natural gas on an industrial basis in an attempt to buy cheap gas for later use. We gave it up as a loser as compression or liquifaction was prohibitively costly for large volumes.



It will be interesting to follow the progress in time to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind, like solar is a wonderful fuel for power &#8211; maybe a little visual pollution but to me that is very minor. Now someone only has to prove an acceptable storage method!</p>
<p>For baseline power storage was easier with coal as the fuel is used on demand. With wind or solar the fuel comes first followed by demand &#8211; a bit more of a challenge.</p>
<p>There are a thousand ideas &#8211; a few good and some totally hare brained &#8211; when a company proves one we will see how much it adds to the power cost per kWh. Renewables are already more expensive &#8211; doubling the cost will not be a very acceptable solution.</p>
<p>I have studied storage of natural gas on an industrial basis in an attempt to buy cheap gas for later use. We gave it up as a loser as compression or liquifaction was prohibitively costly for large volumes.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to follow the progress in time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisp68</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comment-7577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisp68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3567#comment-7577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So will this stop the trains from rumbling past my house at all hours of the night?  I hope so... It&#039;s such ancient technology moving an even more ancient (and dirty) energy source.  The book &#039;Big Coal&#039; explains this whole interconnectivity between the mine, railroad and furnace.  I don&#039;t think there could be a less efficient way of generating electricity.  I think what is most ironic is that Railroad industry no longer uses coal to power their locomotives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will this stop the trains from rumbling past my house at all hours of the night?  I hope so&#8230; It&#8217;s such ancient technology moving an even more ancient (and dirty) energy source.  The book &#8216;Big Coal&#8217; explains this whole interconnectivity between the mine, railroad and furnace.  I don&#8217;t think there could be a less efficient way of generating electricity.  I think what is most ironic is that Railroad industry no longer uses coal to power their locomotives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
